1 readers online now  |  69 million page views

Taqiyya again?

Reader comment on item: Arabist Snobs
in response to reader comment: Ignorance upon Ignorance

Submitted by Peter Hall (Australia), Dec 11, 2011 at 18:45

you said

http://ptonline.aip.org/journals/doc/PHTOAD-ft/vol_60/iss_8/49_1.shtml?bypassSSO=1

Nowhere in that article does the writer ONCE refer to Arabic as a weak language. And even then you relied on a Pakistani Muslim Physics professor.... He confirms what I have been saying. Read you poor stupid fool, the article says the following; Second, the inadequacy of traditional Islamic languages—Arabic, Persian, Urdu—is an important contributory reason. About 80% of the world's scientific literature appears first in English, and few traditional languages in the developing world have I guess you are using Taqiyya again to hide my proof, you first say I have provided no proof I show you again the article giving proof . Then you say the article does not say arabic is a weak language DO I HAVE TO READ IT WORD FOR WORD TO GET YOU TO UNDERSTAND? Is English too difficult for you? Or are you going to go off on another tangent? As to laser. Laser itself is an acronym that describes a type of light, which in itself is an adjective, in that is a acronym to describe a noun. A Laser light using laser as not only a adjective, but the primary use of the word laser, which describes a focused beam of light.

I rest my case ...

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to Taqiyya again? by Peter Hall

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List
eXTReMe Tracker

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2020 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)