5 readers online now  |  69 million page views

Protocols of the fraudsters

Reader comment on item: "Jewish" - Not the Same as "Pro-Israel"
in response to reader comment: Koran?

Submitted by Martin Horan (United Kingdom), Oct 29, 2009 at 21:03

Ivar's comments are slightly illogical. I do not hold that a whole nation should be killed for a few. But Ivar's illogical rant does not stop wiith that ad honinem accusation. I wonder if he has actually read the vile thing, "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion," which, at a cursory glance, can be seen by any logical person to be a glaring fraud.
If Ivar were to read "The Secret History of the Jesuits" or the writings of former Jesuit Father Diego Riviera, who spoke of assassination attempts on his life for exposing that fraternenty, he would find out who the true authors of the so-called Jewish book really were. (History alone attests to what the Jesuits were and are. There are plenty of historical classics on that order, such as Nicolini's "History of the Jesuits." And Paris and Riviera are not the only former Jesuits to have stated that The "Protocals" were a hoax to stir up hatred against the Jews. And it worked as history again attests. Ivar's own hatred of Jewish people shows that--and he can't even see it.)

How could a group of Jews at that time plan to take over the world? Not only such a minority, but a persecuted and despised minority most of whom lived in abject poverty in the ghettos and shtetls of the Western world. The Jews were actually gated in the ghettos and banned by the Catholic church from even having trades. The Catholic church forced them to wear certain distinguishing clothing, and also made them were a yellow badge, later copied by Hitler. The papacy also forced the Jews into usury--by Law! Historical FACTs, Ivar.

I know more about Jewish history and culture than probably all of my Jewish friends. Educated in the Catholic church, I know more of Catholic history than most Catholics I know, (I'm an MA in history). My point here: most Jews have never even heard of "The Protocals" anymore than most so-called Protestants know the Bible, or Catholics know of the Inquisition or of the Borgias or any real Catholic history--the latter not being taught it in their schools. I knew nothing of Catholic history until I left school.(Muslims, on the other hand know their Korans and Hadiths because it is a prerequisite to an education for all Muslims to learn both, especially the Koran which it is incumbent for them to know by heart. )

Zionism is purely Jewish, is it!? By that logic, Israelis are not Zionists, then, because most of them are agnostics and atheists, not Jews.
A Zionist is anyone who loves Israel, whatever his background. I love Israel because when I was raised in Catholicism it was the ONLY country in the Middle-East where I could have gone and practised Catholicism openly; in spite of the Catholic church's history of anti-Semitism, which is even worse than that of Islam--so far!

When I became an agnostic, Israel was still the only place in the Middle-East where I could openly decry religion. Same thing when I became an atheist. When I became a Bible-believing Christian, it was the only place--still--in the Middle-East where I could openly practise what I believed.
Zionists ruling the world today!? Is that why the world's media is so hateful towards Israel and only shows the Arab side? Even under Reagan the US were helping to arm the Arabs. We British were doing it, after reneging on the Balfour Declaration and staffing Arab armies with our own officers.
If the Zionists--whom Ivar equates only with Jews (showing his own blind and irrational hatred of his fellow human beings)-- when many of us personally know Jews who are not ZIonists (Henry Kissinger being the prime example),

If Zionists rule the world, how come they cannot get their influence into the media to explain real historical facts--viz., that the Arabs sent a delegation to the UN as late as 1956 claiming that "Palestine" was a Jewish myth and that there was never any such people? How come the Zionists can't get the media to tell the world that "Palestinians" only started calling themselves by the name the indigenous Jews of the Middle East called themselves till 1948 after Israel defeated the Arabs in the Six-Day War in 1967?

How come the Zionists cannot get the world's media to point out that after the British cut up the Middle East they handed over what had been Jewish lands to the Arabs? How come the Zionists, if they rule the world, cannot get the lists of psychopathic murders that happen daily to ordinary Israelis mentioned in the world's media? How come best-selling books by Christian writers like Christina Wertheim, Dave Hunt, John Haggie, Derek Prince, David Hathaway, James Prasch, Gary Kah, Jeffrey A. Baker, Alan Franklin (I could go on and on and on) and many of whom live in and/or have ministries in Israel, who witness these atrocities and expose them in their books, cannot get a mention of these things in the world's media?
I wonder if Ivar has read any of their books!

Ivar tries a bit of casuitry after claiming that the Zioinst rule the world if I can name any Muslims who do? Of course, the zillionaire Arabs, he must believe, are actually Jewish Zionists! The people who control the oil fields of the Middle East cannot be Arabs in his mind, judging by his ridiculous statement. These oil Zillionaires live in luxury undreamt of by most people while they keep their fellow Muslims and Arabs living in poverty. That, of course, means nothing to Ivar.

Either Ivar does not know the difference between instances and evidence, evidence and facts, and facts and proof. Or he thinks his readers don't. If the latter's the case he has a very low opinion of other people's intelligence.
The only proof he gives us is that he either cannot reason logically or he thinks the rest of us can't and will fall for his cant, if you pardon the pun.
But here's the proof of how he is one or the other (and on a par with any Muslim or Nazi): "How much love does hold a Jewish heart (sic) when he (she) is killing down pregnant women and chiildren?"
He wrote it, I am only quoting what he actually wrote.

So he is implying that Jews are "killing down" pregnant women and children. Says who? "Palestinians" who we can't even believe because they show they are outright liars and frauds who twist history to claim that they are "Palestinians." Arafat their leader wasn't even an Arab, he was an Egyptian. Hello! An Egyptian who was sent by Abdul Nasser to overthrow King Hussein of Jordan. That caused King Hussein to kick these Arabs our of Jordan and, having nowhere to go, Israel gave them Gaza--Gaza which could have fed all their people as it was the breadbasket of Israel itself. Instead, out of spite, these so-called Palestinians destroyed all the Kibutzes that Israelis had built by their own sweat and blood. And Gaza became a springboard of terror against unarmed civilians, Arabs and Jews. That's how Israel was rewarded for giving these people land.
Before Ivar quotes terrorist propaganda, he should ask himself what kind of people send their very own children across minefields to clear mines for their advancing armies? Or what kind of people train their own children to be suicide bombers? Yes, their own children! Not even the Jew-loathing Nazis did that.

Interestingly, it is not Jewish journalists I have got this from (I was a journalist) but from Christian ones reporting in the Middle East who know far more than Ivar knows. All Ivar's arguments are blatant suppositions. And he doesn't know that they are or he would not be making them. Unlesss, he's just hoping the rest of us are to ignorant and stupid to see it.

Then Ivar takes a high-handed approach as if he is above the rest of humanity. His rationale is all a bit woolly and sounds like he's been reading some New Age stuff, none of which can be argued from logic. Everyone is to drop their paradigms--this is from a person who has an anti-Semitic paradigm based on a bogus book, exposed as a fraud, not only by (non-Jewish) philosophers and historians but by Jesuits themselves. He has a paradigm that the Zionists rule the world which of itself shows that he doesn't feel he needs to change that paradigm. This dogmatist tells us we should get rid of "all this dogmatic stuff"--which is a bit like the pope saying we should get rid of Catholicsm--and that we should all widen our minds (his own being so wide to include everyone else--except Jews!)

I would agree with him regarding religion, as did the first Christians--who were all Jewish! But religious people are not small groupsas Ivar maintains. If they were there would be less problems in the world.
And he tells us he has learned to love everyone--not including Jews and Zionists, of course, which is one and the same thing to Ivar, as he himself has already told us.
He ends by telling us it is time for a change. What kind of a change? He doesn't say. Germany was told that by Hitler, Britain was told it by Blair. Hitler brought about Germany's downfall and Blair has brought about ours (Britain's) as Obama's about to bring about America's. Obama, remember, talked all the time in his election speeches about change. He did not go into detail either. One thing we do know is that he always sides with the Araba against Israel. If the most powerful man in the world can do that how can Zionists rule the world? Russia is a blatantly anti-Semitic country. It has been arming Arab terrorists since they have existed. That's only Russia and America and Britain's the same. And, of course, the whole Arab and Muslim world--yet Zionists rule the world!!!
As to Ivar, I would say to him, it's not about changing paradigms per se, that's needed. It's making the paradigms fit the facts that's needed, not the other way round. ALL politically-minded and religious people make the facts fit the paradigms with their thinking--exactly as Ivar himslef is doing.
The root of anti-Semitism is spiritual. It cannot possibly be anything else because it is neither logical nor rational. Ivar's own argument is a perfect example of that. Anti-Semitism is only explained to us in one book and one book alone--the Bible; the New Testament as well as Old Testament warns of it. The Bible was written long before the Koran and the prophecies of the Koran's Islamic 1000 year reign did not happen. The Old Testament gives us hundreds of prophecies of the Jewish Messiah, most of which happened--ALL of the ones regarding His first coming. The scene is now set for His Second Coming--those prophecies regarding "Jacob's Trouble" when all the nations of the earth will come against Israel.
God promised the Jewish people and the Jewish people alone--not us Christians--that "those who bless you I will bless and those that curse you I will curse." If anyone can't see that, let them look at the history--even recent histories--of those who have persecuted God's physical people. Look at Germany, Russia, the Catholic nations and the Muslim nations.
The Bible names names--of peoples and nations. No other book does. All Israel's enemies are named and they are preparing, as the prophets and Jesus Christ Himself prophesied of them, to come against Israel in the last days. The one-world government is coming into being now, as only the Bible prophesied. My hope is that the Ivars of this world start to read it and realize it. If he wants "Palestinians" and their ilk to have peace and prosperity--as indeed I myself do--he is not going to see it, not this side of Armageddon. In fact, neither will the Jewish people until, Yeshua Ha Moshiach returns to fight for them. He has promised He will, and nothing can stand in His way. Woe betide those who try it.
All the "Great" empires Babylon, Assyria, Greece, Rome, &c., that persecuted and abused the Jews are dead and buried and remembered only by historians (as the Bible prophesied would happen to them). But the Jews are still here. God, through the prophets told the Jewish people, that they would be back in their land and the desert would bloom and their cities established. It's happened. There's the proof for those who can see it. Ivar is correct in the sense that humanity has learnt nothing. But there's only one place where he and anyone else can find the conclusion. It is in the Bible alone, the book through which God used the Jewish people to write for humanity.
Interesting that Ivar can exuse Sharia law and suicide bombers yet condemn Jews for defending themselves against such atrocities. Now there's proof in itself that anti-Semitism is spiritural. And it is a doctrine of demons, to use a New Testament term.


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (75) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
Is J-Street a neo-Bundist movement? [72 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
PezDispenserMar 23, 2015 06:54222464
Zionist now the 'PC' word for Jew [228 words]AndyOct 25, 2009 01:17163531
ZIONISM = NATIONALISM [174 words]JohnNov 6, 2009 17:54163531
Christian Zionism [17 words]Peter FosterSep 26, 2009 23:20162163
Christian ZIonist [768 words]Martin HoranSep 25, 2009 18:16162115
1Koran? [528 words]IvarOct 28, 2009 10:38162115
Protocols of the fraudsters [2180 words]Martin HoranOct 29, 2009 21:03162115
Fraudsters? Who they were? [1289 words]IvarOct 30, 2009 20:28162115
The time has come [52 words]mark haymanNov 7, 2009 18:28162115
Jewish Christian? [3087 words]Martin HoranNov 24, 2009 20:50162115
bnp member [204 words]jamesOct 12, 2011 20:10162115
James and Churchill. [197 words]Martin HoranOct 14, 2011 19:29162115
Mr Pipes is right on..trying to make peace with a "crocodile" only gets your arm chopped off as you try to pet him. [117 words]Ben ZalmanSep 21, 2009 13:02161848
It's our Jewish youth that worries me. My Grandson didnt even know what "Zionism" means! [80 words]Ben ZalmanSep 21, 2009 12:48161847
I have changed my opinion over the years [636 words]sigmundSep 20, 2009 16:09161803
Liberalism as Religious Faith [177 words]Fay VoshellSep 8, 2009 13:53161264
Becoming very weary of Anglo Jews in the Democrat Party [129 words]James B from CanadaSep 15, 2009 13:53161264
James, unfortunately you forgot some major self hating players [185 words]saraSep 15, 2009 18:02161264
Good Jew = Good Liberal ( but not when it comes to business) [162 words]James B from CanadaSep 16, 2009 08:05161264
2Why I am not a Zionist anymore [1009 words]Marc FeldmanSep 7, 2009 10:32161199
Are ashkenazi jews real jews? [87 words]ShaharOct 19, 2009 05:58161199
I am pro-Israel, but I am not a Zionist. [122 words]Marc FeldmanOct 20, 2009 18:48161199
taking care of "the beloved" [94 words]Michele EzellSep 4, 2009 15:08161068
Who tries the hearts [91 words]Michele EzellOct 4, 2009 15:35161068
about hearts [91 words]MicheleJan 15, 2010 06:28161068
Proud Zionist [68 words]SBSep 1, 2009 20:50160947
Never prouder to be a Jewish Zionist [11 words]Jon KleinmanSep 20, 2009 20:04160947
Are all supporters of Israel Zionists? [205 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
LouisAug 28, 2009 19:17160744
Zionism should be historical. Call it Israeli nationalism or simply Pro-Israel. [139 words]Marc FeldmanOct 22, 2009 18:52160744
Allah against the Palestinians and muslims [64 words]Christian MohamadAug 24, 2009 17:10160600
1Sorry Christian Mohamad... [124 words]DillahSep 20, 2009 16:16160600
Beheadings [124 words]Christian MohamadSep 23, 2009 08:11160600
Yes and he also said... [22 words]LynnSep 23, 2009 10:17160600
imams Were able to fool the Muslims and non muslims [189 words]01SpSep 29, 2009 08:25160600
In Response to Christian Mohamad [918 words]DillahOct 8, 2009 00:37160600
European Koran [316 words]Krisitian MohammedOct 9, 2009 01:42160600
You can't erase the past. [197 words]LynnOct 12, 2009 12:42160600
which Mohammad you are talking about ? [43 words]New QuranOct 14, 2009 00:10160600
New Quran [428 words]LynnOct 20, 2009 09:13160600
RE: to Krisitian Mohamad [303 words]DillahNov 11, 2009 19:17160600
Another victim of Islam and Arabinan imperialism [231 words]dhimmi no moreNov 12, 2009 08:08160600
A Spiritual Divide [251 words]Fay VoshellAug 24, 2009 10:54160590
??? [26 words]PavaAug 24, 2009 00:01160574
Clarifying definitions [146 words]Rebecca MouldsAug 21, 2009 09:34160490
Agree Rebecca- regarding Christian Zionists. [132 words]YnnatchkahAug 23, 2009 02:53160490
You Know Nothing About Christian Zionists [106 words]LogiconSep 3, 2009 09:59160490
Really??? [35 words]Rebecca MouldsSep 4, 2009 17:54160490
To Clarify [91 words]Michele EzellSep 4, 2009 21:04160490
References [29 words]Michele EzellSep 26, 2009 00:48160490
Zionism is not Judaism [41 words]Franz von FearAug 21, 2009 03:27160483
"Jews are adherents of a faith, not a political movement-"quote from your column [65 words]David ZoharAug 20, 2009 02:06160449
Jewish not the same as Pro-Israel [74 words]Yitzhak FiersteinAug 20, 2009 01:22160447
Note the Jews in the US congress. [180 words]M.D.Aug 19, 2009 17:37160435
1Tell it to the pro-Palestinians [72 words]Cheryl MAug 19, 2009 16:03160428
non-Christian Zionists [98 words]Anne JulienneAug 19, 2009 15:39160423
Zionism is not Judaism [64 words]Franz von FearAug 19, 2009 15:00160422
Are Kadima and Labour "Pro-Israel?" [48 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
informAug 19, 2009 14:50160421
Zionism and Judaism [97 words]Stefan MarcusAug 19, 2009 14:03160419
Zionism [55 words]Janusz KowealikAug 19, 2009 13:43160415
Our enemies usually don't discriminate between Jewish Zionists and Jewish Israel bashers [639 words]Ken BesigAug 19, 2009 09:39160410
Our enemies usually don't discriminate [142 words]sheik Yer'MamiAug 19, 2009 23:26160410
must take exception to one statement, "Jews are adherents of a faith, not a political movement" -- [37 words]MarkAug 19, 2009 09:24160409
Being Jewish is not synonymous with being Zionist [135 words]Margalit ShinarAug 19, 2009 07:10160403
Islamist "love" for Jews. [156 words]GenivaldoAug 18, 2009 17:50160376
Who is a Zionist? [103 words]Isaac FlaksAug 18, 2009 10:06160361
Who is a Zionist - Indeed! [489 words]M. ToveySep 3, 2009 19:04160361
Remember. [355 words]LynnAug 18, 2009 09:43160360
Interesting comment on Jews [97 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Debanjan BanerjeeAug 18, 2009 09:00160359
But aren't you . . . ? [116 words]RebekahAug 18, 2009 08:46160358
My Christian upbringing makes me a Christian Zionist ! [244 words]Phil GreendAug 17, 2009 23:31160341
I am not sure what the non-zionist Jews want or expect Israel to do. [27 words]Abu NudnikAug 19, 2009 13:44160341
the real israel [186 words]ayahSep 21, 2009 18:42160341
What bogus sources are you getting your info from I wonder [658 words]saraSep 22, 2009 18:38160341
An explanation to my views [960 words]ayahSep 23, 2009 01:07160341
Christian Zionism Requires Full Understanding of the Hebrew Holy Bible [521 words]M. ToveySep 23, 2009 17:02160341

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to Protocols of the fraudsters by Martin Horan

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List
eXTReMe Tracker

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2020 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)