Who is Mohammed
Reader comment on item: Who was the Prophet Muhammad?

Submitted by Geoffrey B Slater (Russian Federation), Oct 7, 2007 at 00:54

After reading the article concerning the authenticity of Mohamed I would offer readers to look at this website that details a study done by Sir William Muir. http://answering-islam.org/Books/Muir/index.htm

and also this site http://www.truthnet.org/islam/src-pref.htm

which details a study by, W. St. Clair-Tisdall, comparing the Koran with other extant literary sources predating Mohamed.

It seems reasonably clear from these documents and others that Mohamed's words were written down rather faithfully by his original following. I do not doubt the existence of Mohamed, nor of his ability to motivate or inspire people. He must have had a powerful charisma.

What I think is necessary for my Muslim, friends to do, if they want to achieve true understanding of God, is to read all books with an open mind and an open heart. It is too easy to say "this is the only book" by excluding the possibility of disagreement one can live in a world that doesn't exist quite happily. The problem is that in the end you must deal with the rest of the us who live in another reality.

I have also come across an extremely fascinating set of books by one Reginald Fessenden. In his books the Deluged Civilization of the Caucasus, circa 1923, he details a theory that in the Caucasus the original civilization spoken of in the Bible, and the history (mythology) of the Greeks, Phonecians, Egyptians, and Sumerians had its origins. It is necessary to read the entire set of books and further read the documents referenced in his work to gain a full understanding but the key point is that the earliest civilizations post dating the Flood obtained their understanding of God from the same original source.

Geoffrey B Slater

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.