|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
a real blow to official historyReader comment on item: Who was the Prophet Muhammad? Submitted by Gul (Saudi Arabia), Mar 13, 2010 at 12:16 I would like to refer to Yaya's response dated Jan 26, 2007 entitled "a very interesting point of view" in which he commented on Who was the Prophet Muhammad. I have just finished reading it myself and rather laboriously so. It is not by any means an easy piece of reading. In fact it makes for quite a stodgy read and non-specialists should definitely steer clear but I must admit it is without a doubt the most compelling and the best study of Early Islam ever published. It is in fact so impressive it should be translated into English without delay. It should also be stressed that without ever ever being offensive, Gallez's conclusion will undoubtedly appear to Muslims as much too disturbing to have any credibility. However the wealth of historical facts and references patiently documented in his remarkable and thorough research are simply brilliant and irrefutable. Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments". Comment on this item
|
Latest Articles Join Daniel Pipes on a Fact Finding Expedition to Israel, March 2012
For full details click here ADVERTISEMENTS
Most Mailed |
|||||||||||
|
All materials written by Daniel Pipes on this site © 1968-2012 Daniel Pipes. Email: daniel.pipes@gmail.com You can help support Daniel Pipes' work by making a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum. Daniel J. Pipes |
||||||||||||