69 million page views

Response and Responsibilities

Reader comment on item: Something Rotten in Denmark?
in response to reader comment: Adib Farakish.. they themselves are not sure about their religion

Submitted by Sarah (Sweden), Mar 21, 2006 at 05:16

Donvan, you asked me to respond to your message. But how can I respond to your comments, when its not complete? If your words were 'reasoned disagreement' and not hostile, libeous, or otherwise objectionable, then it wouldn't have been edited. So now I hope you understand that if you want your opponent to respond to your comments, your responsibility would be express your views in a manner so that they are posted at this board and viewed by the person(s) you're debating with.

You may disagree, but disagree peacefully (another subject I fully agree with M al-Content).

The same goes for Sword regarding his/her message 'the moral of the story'.

So try again, my friend.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)