69 million page views

Impracticality of that Concept

Reader comment on item: Study the Koran?
in response to reader comment: Someone please educate me on Surah AR-rahman of Quran

Submitted by M Tovey (United States), May 2, 2022 at 19:58

Of the many incomprehensible aspects of studying the Quran (and for the record, not all avenues of comprehending the Quran are beneficial to students of Western morays), the one that rises to the surface of such perceptions is the issue of promoting as a reward, the questionable promise of companionship by a chaste female. Is this not an unsustainable relationship that by its very premise, does not last? It cannot function in an eternal state.
This was not properly absorbed from the Quranic understanding of the teaching of Messiah; and man and woman (a chaste maiden) are joined; then once joined, are mates for life, temporary in that when one of the mates dies, the remaining mate is set free and is available to mate again, if the other factors are favorable. Innocence in being chaste in the mortal sense cannot be presumed, now can it? Someone ratify this notion, or can they?

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2023 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)