Our dear Matthew al-tablighee and a free lesson in Arabic grammar

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Feb 3, 2022 at 08:09

Our dear Matthew al-tablighee who told us that he teaches Arabic and in the meantime his command of Arabic is zero. Check the video below and provide us with comments about this ignorant Pakistani tablighee whose command of Arabic is just as bad as your command of Arabic. And remember that half knowledge is very dangerous.

1. From the root ق-ت-ل or Q-T-L or قتل we have two words:

قُتِلَ or Qutila or he was killed (verb masculine past tense singular).

قَاتَلَ or Qatala or he was fighting (verb masculine past tense singular).

Notice that if you change the short vowels and in the case قَاتَلَ add an Alif the meaning changes

So the question is: Which version of the rasm قتل or QTL is in al-Lawh al-Mahfuz and it cannot be both. Do tell us O Guru of the Arabic language.

Before you answer and this is from al-Tabari's Tafsir of Surat al-Ruum and the word غلبت and is it غَلَبَتْ or "won " or غُلِبَتْ or "defeated" so which version is in Allah's al-Lawh al-Mahfuz? Notice same Rasm but different short vowels.

What a disaster

Oh here is the video and watch and laugh about the ignorance of these tablighees

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qEs8kITEgSs&t=0s

The real question is: How does this fool support himself?

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".