OH MY GOD...

Submitted by Hamzah (United Arab Emirates), Dec 29, 2021 at 04:27

Zakir Naik, Mufti Menk, and Shabir Ally have already said that the literal meaning ISNT holy war, and from what I know, these are world renowned scholars. Here is their reasoning:

Jihad is a term used for struggle against the enemies of Islam, and most of the time, it is not a "war" that is necessarily taking place but rather a struggle against the people who pressurize Muslims.

A good example of this is that in China, a Muslim woman was stripped of her Hijab by an Israeli man who claimed it to be "freedom", 2 Muslim Chinese men came in defense of the girl and got the Israeli man in jail. This was still termed as "jihad" even though it wasn't a holy war, in fact, it wasn't a war at all!

conclusion: jihad doesnt NECESSARILY mean "holy war", it just means "struggle against the enemies of Islam".

Now you may ask: "then are you saying that al-Tabari war wrong?", well, partially as he only stated it to be "holy war" when it can be a large majority of things.

And the term "holy war" does come under jihad, I'm not denying that, but jihad can definitely have other meanings as well.

...

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".