Our dear Matthew al-Tablighee صلى الله عليه وسلم is admitting that "it is no crime in adding an H to Sura"

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Jan 11, 2022 at 06:32

The worst enemy of tablighees the likes of our dear Matthew is themselves and not us the kuffar

>As I told you before, it can be either of them. If transliterations are really that bad then why do the majority of them call "sura", "surah"? you know why? because it can be either way. The pronunciation stays "sura", but no crime in adding an "h" to it. And same goes for the others.

Then why do tablighees add an "H" to Sura when there is no "H" as the last letter and it is a silent Ta Marbouta? And who do tablighees have no clue about the Arabic language "definite article"? So Surat al-Baqara becomes the funny tablighee Surah (sic) Baqarah (sic)?

I will tell you why: Because your so called scholars are ignorant and they lie to you and you in turn lie to others right Mr. lost tablighee?

Do you see why every time you post...I will embarrass you

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".