69 million page views

Disasters, disasters, disasters

Reader comment on item: Israel Has a War to Win
in response to reader comment: Our dear Abdul aka Hamzah (sic) and the 'A'isha's disaster!

Submitted by Hamzah (United Arab Emirates), Dec 28, 2021 at 05:12

Didn't Abdul Hadi already make it clear that normal Muslims are strictly against Tablighi? and Allah could've made every man, woman and child a Muslim if he wanted to, but he doesn't, why? because he wants humans to find the truth and convert themselves. You are currently in a state where you are too happy worshipping your own Gods, and I do pray for your Hidayah to Allah. Allah has already presented you to Islam, since I see that you know a lot about it, Allah has done what he wanted to do, it is now your job to identify if this religion is true or not, and you fail to do so, you have failed the test.

The place where the prophet lived at the time, Mecca, was unstable as people like Umayyah and Abu Jahl ruled it who themselves had wives who didn't reach adulthood, so your claim that it was illegal at the time is totally false. If Allah would've helped the prophet and his companions so easily, the whole world would be a Muslim today. Jihad basically means struggle against enemies of Islam, and people were launching attacks on the prophet and killing his companions already, so your claim that Jihad started only in 622 AD is totally false. And no, Jihad doesn't mean "holy war", it's a misconception. The prophet didn't commit تفخيذ with her at all, it's made up just so non-Muslims like you can attack us Muslims for no reason.

And here is further proof that Qur'an does not contain any grammatical errors. Nabeel Qureshi, a man who converted from Islam to Christianity still says that the Qur'an is the peak of eloquence when it comes to Arabic, and he knows Arabic, so don't come up with a lame excuse of "Oh, but he doesn't know Arabic", now prove Nabeel Qureshi wrong or *whatever your toxic personality would prefer to write here*!!

And you keep calling me a "Tablighi" or a "wannabe Arab", well, there are a lot of Hindus out there who aren't Indians but still follow Hinduism, so can I call all of them "wannabe Indian" or can I call every Hindu a member of the Bajrang Dal?

Oh yeah, talking about Hindus, they recently pledged that they would wipe off all Muslims from the face of India, how is that justified? and I wouldn't even be surprised if you made the pledge with them.

And Krishna had around 16,000 WIVES!!! where does that fit in today's law and order??


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2023 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)