69 million page views

Open question about negotiating with terrorists.

Reader comment on item: Weak Brits, Tough French

Submitted by Adam (United States), Jul 12, 2005 at 18:24

This may be a really dumb question but the line about Paris standing firm made me wonder something. What would happen if governments agreed to (in this case) reverse the ban or agree to withdraw from Iraq and then renege on that decision. When the "ransom" can be instantly withdrawn after the deal why shouldn't a govenrment stick it to a terrorist group and go back on their promise after they recover the abductees. They know there will be more kidnappings regardless. I have a gut feeling this would be a bad idea but I can't decide why. Any thoughts would help. Thanks


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2023 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)