69 million page views

Democracy v Republic

Reader comment on item: A Neo-Conservative's Caution

Submitted by Raymond Singer (United States), Mar 9, 2005 at 01:12

Daniel points out the fallacy that a democracy offers individual freedom, as opposed to providing a means for the majority to dictate to the individual.

The US is also losing the battle for liberty to democracy, which seeks to tyrannically impose its values on all citizens.

A republic, such as envisioned in the original US constitution, offers a much better possibility of true liberty, than does our increasingly dictatorial democracy.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)