2 readers online now  |  69 million page views

Hindukush = hindu killer

Reader comment on item: Is Tariq Ramadan Lying [about Magdi Allam]?
in response to reader comment: A sword disguised as a pen

Submitted by G.Vishvas (Germany), Apr 21, 2007 at 05:17

Respected Frahad Navkhod

Good to know a muslim who does not have an Arabic name (I suppose your name is persian). Islam is an instrument of Arabic hegemony. But at least your name (if not your mind) is an exception.

My intention is to expose islam as a fascist totalitarian ideology (pretending to be a good religion) and islam as an instrument of arabic imperialism and arabisation.

I would very much appreciate you correcting me by pointing out what my in-built lies are. I also participated in two muslim web forums and criticised islam and I was immediately accused of "hatred" and kicked out. So much about muslims' open-minded-ness. "Call someone a dog and shoot him" - as they say.

Brahmins are being dubbed alien in India by dalits, dravidian racists, muslims, Marxists etc. The muslim idea is: the Brahmins (brahminism) also came from outside of India like muslims (islam) did so what right do they have to call us alien.

Brahmins were among the many others (many more non-brahmins) who protested against quotas for OBC's (not dalits). It is the creamy layer problem also involved in it. The quotas allotted to OBC's or dalits have been mostly filled by only some castes among the OBC's and dalits and others have gone empty handed. E.g. in Maharastra the dalit quota is mostly bagged by the mahars, the other dalits complained about it. So the mahars did exactly what they accused the high castes of having done. So on it goes.

The muslims are proud of what their ancestors did in terms of aggressions, violent acts, plunderings, rape, abdications, conversions, theft etc. Even in the year 2007 there is no move among the muslims to make a clean break with this past. They teach their children to be proud of the battle of badr (627 AD) but do not wish to be reminded of the ill-deeds of their ancestors which were perpetrated after 627 AD. I reminded you of 2007 only to tell you that kuran is out of date now. Come and live in the 21st century, but let's not forget the good and BAD things done by our ancestors (including also my Brahmin ancestors).

Human beings are neither equal nor equal-valued. They never were and never shall be. If islam tells something else then it is populism, just to attract people to islam. Islam is thus making a promise which it did not, and can not, and will not be able to keep. Why this deceit? To attract people and fool them. At least Brahmins don't issue forth that lie. In return they get vilified. If someone falls from the second floor and breaks his leg then why blame the law of gravity or blame Newton, who merely formulated this law in an algebraic fashion? So it is with inequality. Brahmins do not create inequality, they point out that inequality exists and hence humans will have to be separated and shielded from one another – as groups and as individuals. Hindu religions are the only ones which have the honesty to talk about human inequality. Other religions are deceitful in this respect and make false promises in order to attract people into their fold. As far as skin-colour is concerned you will find many very dark-skinned Brahmins also – never seen any?

Dr. Ambedkar – who has now been made into a god by his followers – was acceptable to the Brahmins as a person but not as leader of a group of people. To what group-dynamism leads to – we have seen that recently in India as the dalits go on a rampage whenever a "holy" statue of Ambedkar is defiled (in Kanpur some drunk dalits did it and they went berserk and burned the Deccan Queen near Mumbai). So the Brahmins were right. In fact one reason why the muslim Jinnah disliked the hindu Gandhi was because Gandhi went in for group actions and Jinnah resented that and warned him about the ill consequences of such group-agitation methods in politics. To what group-actionism in politics leads to – we are seeing the ill-effects of that in the Indian subcontinent. This is called ochlocracy. So Jinnah was right in his warnings in this regard (but not in all matters).

Re.: Dr. Ambedkar. Do take care to read what he writes about islam and why he rejected the idea of converting to islam.

I am not an expert, but I have read a lot about Judaism, christianity and islam and their mutual inherent hatred and rejection. If there was any occasional or regional peace between them in the past then it was a result of ignorance of this ingrained hatred and mutual rejections or a stop-gap arrangement of convenience. Muslims and their rulers often did not take islam seriously and then they brought forth tolerance, science or peace. As soon as islam asserts itself these three disappear.

As muslims become more aware of real islam and its rejective arguments against earlier "abrahamic" religions, this "tolerance" has vanished. A and B had no quarrel in the past does not automatically mean they will not have it in the future. Its is often a question of knowing one's theory better. Once the jews, Christians and muslims come to know each others theological theories then there is no peace between them anywhere.

Often muslims come up with this idea of past muslim (pseudo-)tolerance to suggest that islam is tolerant. With that trick you can fool some na├»ve guys – but not one who knows the theory and history of islam. Demographic numbers and changes clearly prove that islam is intolerant and causes non-muslims to run way or be exterminated. Iran, Anatolia, Sindhu river basin in Pakistan, Arabia, North Africa etc. – everywhere the non-muslim populations have fallen below 5% from the 100% some 1000-1400 years ago. Any talk of Islamic tolerance is completely cancelled by these numbers.

Islam inherently satisfies several criteria of fascism, totalitarianism and imperialism – because it presents itself as religion of god it can hide these ill characteristics cleverly - something which other "godless" f-t-i ideologies cannot do. Islam knows how to misuse the word "god / allah" for its own deceits and tricks. The very word "god" makes many people loose their intelligence and critical abilities. God is the most misused word in the history of mankind and islam was and is a world-champion in this misuse. And there is an enormous amount of hatred and anger in the kuran against islam-rejecters and ex-muslims.

Hindu religions are free to develop under the leadership of innumerable personalities all over the Indian subcontinent even today. Islam was closed on the day Mohammad died in 632 AD. Islam regards innovation (biddat) as a sin. Therefore islam belongs to Makkah and Madinah of the 7th century and has no relevance today - except for and through violence and manipulation upon those who have no will or ability to resist its falsehoods and intimidations.

The word hindu is not a persian word. It comes from the name "Sindhu" in the achamenean times (6th century BC). The Iranians (not Persians) pronounced the "s" often as "h" (see asura > ahura, soma> haoma etc.). Thus sindhu became hindu. From hindu it became indos / (plural) indoi, since the Greeks could not pronounce "h" and had no "h" and no proper "u". The word "indoi" travelled west to the latin-roman areas and was transformed into "India". (And Columbus transported it to the Americas – the name America itself being derived from the name of the Italian traveller Amerigo Vespucci!). If someone misreads your name as Farad and then changes it to Faraday, then you may be mistaken as a descendant of Michael Faraday. But that does not really make you into a descendant of Michael Faraday.

Hindukush means "hindu killer" from the Persian verb kushtan = to kill. The name of these mountains and how they got this name should remind you of what muslims did to the hindus. Some muslims even tried to change the name to "hindu khush" in order to create the exactly opposite implication and thus try to hide the muslims' ill-deeds. (kafir (in original Arabic) = one who hides or conceals). The word Hindukush came approx. 1500 years after the word hindu came up.

You muslims must develop the habit of reading more and wider than what your muslim leaders and teachers limit upon you. The idea that kuran is the last and best guidance is one of your basic follies. E.g. read the wikipedia (in internet) and you will have more knowledge and intellectual freedoms than what islam can ever give you. And there are many more honest and free sources of knowledge. Islam means submission and that is incompatible with honesty and independent thinking. A god who demands submission is no god. He is a tyrant. And worse still and dangerous are those who speak in the name of such a submission-demanding god.

Read also my comment on


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (105) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
3Brave Man [54 words]skmillerApr 2, 2008 10:34124411
Magdi Allam Could Create A Berlin Wall Breakdown Effect [33 words]AnneMApr 4, 2008 19:10124411
Clapping with thumbs!!! [108 words]MansoorApr 7, 2008 16:09124411
response to Clapping with thumbs!!! by Mansoor [210 words]IfrahimJan 15, 2009 17:23124411
1Islam and Choice of faith [134 words]agusmiswantoApr 1, 2008 00:55124273
Freedom of Relgion [52 words]tamimisledusMar 26, 2014 04:03124273
really not a big deal..... [88 words]ahmadzafireMar 30, 2008 21:06124138
you must have heard of this.... [14 words]ohmegoshApr 1, 2008 05:13124138
Christianity [53 words]Clifford IshiiMar 25, 2008 17:14123622
Magdi Christiano Allam I salute you! [45 words]Liliana DiPerna-CohenMar 24, 2008 07:40123473
Magdi or Madbee [111 words]MansoorApr 3, 2008 15:20123473
Magdi or Madbee, what`s in a name? [22 words]mytwocentsApr 5, 2008 08:45123473
thanks Pope Benedict [56 words]Jerome Mc KennaMar 23, 2008 20:49123428
It's not another proof [16 words]ZakoMar 23, 2008 16:53123405
Orthodoxes are already baptized [44 words]SantiagoMar 24, 2008 08:02123405
Catholics don't rebaptize [88 words]Michael E. Stora, Ph.D.Apr 3, 2008 23:44123405
Magdi Allam: Congratulations [21 words]dhimmi no moreMar 23, 2008 07:06123341
Allam's Easter Conversion [47 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Oakes SpaldingMar 22, 2008 19:09123286
I would have taken them to the cleaners [34 words]dhimmi no moreMar 4, 2008 08:01121701
Congradulations to Dr. Pipes! [66 words]jennifer solisMar 3, 2008 19:09121660
"Muslim Weekly" Apologizes to Daniel Pipes -- sweeeeeet [112 words]KristaMar 3, 2008 16:56121650
1Cheers and Congratulations to Dr. Pipes/ Muslims weekly [18 words]YnnatchkahMar 3, 2008 22:05121650
Not a Muslim [132 words]IsaacMar 22, 2008 23:59121650
Not a Muslim ? [102 words]KristaMar 31, 2008 19:22121650
14Lying is permitted in Islam (Taquia) [188 words]DavidDec 24, 2007 13:17116862
Tariq Ramadan in a confused man [76 words]Saleem AkhtarMar 28, 2007 19:5488151
1moderate Islam is an impossiblility. Reformation of Islam is impossible [256 words]ForrestMar 18, 2007 14:1386759
"Muhammad beheaded thousands", Mr Forrest? [9 words]AmriAug 22, 2007 13:5686759
where does it say [17 words]Oz.Mar 14, 2010 16:2686759
Tariq Ramadan forced to retract defamatory statements [163 words]Jean-Charles BrisardMar 7, 2007 15:4080725
Lying is a tool [85 words]OllieMar 7, 2007 19:1880725
Very interesting [231 words]dhimmi no moreApr 8, 2007 16:2980725
Why he is in Europe [102 words]DavidDec 24, 2007 13:3180725
What Pipes did not notice [66 words]Zahirah ShakirMar 7, 2007 15:0180715
Is Tariq Ramadhan Lying? [63 words]OllieMar 7, 2007 13:2880700
He's trying to open up everybody's mind so there's no racalism [9 words]Hamba AllahNov 25, 2009 09:1580700
Everything he needed to know he learned from Nietzsche [101 words]Archimedes2Mar 6, 2007 19:2780590
I am Italian [114 words]OctavioMar 6, 2007 19:0180585
Fretting & Whining [296 words]Abu NuwasMar 6, 2007 10:3680528
We've seen things like this before [40 words]Peter HerzMar 6, 2007 07:1580515
Tariq Ramadan and self hate! [213 words]dhimmi no moreMar 6, 2007 06:5880514
Copts [49 words]CVTMar 9, 2007 11:5880514
Copts [40 words]dhimmi no moreMar 9, 2007 18:1480514
Copts [64 words]cvtMar 14, 2007 08:5280514
COPTS NUMBER CLOSER TO 15-20% [97 words]MOROUSMar 16, 2007 12:4880514
When Arabs are going to return Egypt to the Egyptians? [64 words]Alex SabyMar 25, 2008 23:2780514
7Lying endemic to Arab culture? [171 words]Will ScottMar 6, 2007 04:3380497
Never thank...never apologize [108 words]NounaApr 3, 2007 21:1080497
Arabs and admitting mistakes [290 words]Hugo SJul 8, 2011 04:5380497
Can't imagine D Pipes other than truthful [138 words]ptorpisMar 5, 2007 23:3180473
Are his lips moving? [220 words]SusanMar 5, 2007 23:2380471
Answer to Susan ( Is Tarik Ramadan lying??) [49 words]rachelle assoulineMar 12, 2007 10:5280471
Tariq Ramadan cannot be trusted [162 words]FaqiMar 5, 2007 22:5280466
Tariq Ramadan about his grandfather Hassan al-Banna [160 words]GudrunMar 7, 2007 06:3380466
Response to Mr. Gudrun [154 words]FaqiMar 7, 2007 21:0280466
More Lights about Islamic Dawah resources [37 words]ibrahim muhammadSep 27, 2007 12:2880466
Squirm and lash out [137 words]David W. LincolnMar 5, 2007 22:3880464
This debate appears like walking in a mine field... [238 words]Rick HouseMar 5, 2007 21:2680452
Let us Calm Down [50 words]Romesh ChanderMar 5, 2007 21:2480451
Romesh Chander, your comment can be considered anti-Semitic, [50 words]Andras BerenyMar 3, 2008 19:3580451
Reply to Andras Bereny [50 words]Romesh ChanderMar 4, 2008 16:5580451
Nono, I understood it perfectly [32 words]Andras BerenyMar 4, 2008 20:2980451
Reply to Andras -- again [73 words]Romesh ChanderMar 5, 2008 18:3780451
Attacked by Taqiya Ramadan? Wear It As a Badge of Honor. [433 words]David LMar 5, 2007 21:1680450
Ramadan/Allam [109 words]ankhfnkhonsuMar 5, 2007 20:3880449
Ramadan snagged on a careless lie [298 words]Archimedes2Mar 5, 2007 19:5880434
Ramadan, the Islamic wolf in sheep's clothing [68 words]SanchezMar 5, 2007 19:5580432
Close reading of Text/Speech [103 words]Robin LathangueMar 5, 2007 19:3780430
Lying by the book [92 words]Jacques BakkeMar 5, 2007 19:1480429
Tariq Ramadan:Liar -Liar Rants For Hire! Claims $900 to Hamas irrelevant since charity' wasnt yet illegal [230 words]Ben van de PolderMar 5, 2007 19:1480428
Ramadan [55 words]Stephane S LubiczMar 5, 2007 18:3880419
REBUTTAL [65 words]David R.GroesbeckMar 5, 2007 18:3780418
translation from the Italian [168 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Stephanie CookMar 5, 2007 17:5980409
Lying [118 words]Donald W. BalesMar 5, 2007 17:1780399
Tariq Ramadan is lying all the time! [195 words]EussnerMar 5, 2007 17:0680396
Islam and dishonesty [103 words]G. VishvasMar 6, 2007 06:4680396
Response to Visvas [104 words]Frahad NavkhodaApr 17, 2007 11:1080396
To Frahad Navkhoda [874 words]G.VishvasApr 18, 2007 06:0880396
A sword disguised as a pen [306 words]Response to VishvasApr 20, 2007 05:1880396
1Hindukush = hindu killer [1501 words]G.VishvasApr 21, 2007 05:1780396
The legacy of 'Shivaji' [544 words]Frahad NavkhodaApr 23, 2007 06:0280396
To Frahad [393 words]G.VishvasApr 24, 2007 04:0780396
Further Comments to Frahad [697 words]G.VishvasApr 25, 2007 03:4980396
Merchant of Mischief [280 words]Frahad NavkhodaApr 26, 2007 06:3780396
To Frahad Navkhoda (II) [1072 words]G.VishvasApr 27, 2007 04:4080396
Regurgitated seven times by a holy cow [120 words]Frahad NavkhodaApr 30, 2007 04:2580396
of holy cows [251 words]G.VishvasMay 1, 2007 06:1580396
Extremism is a multi faced monster [282 words]Frahad NavkhodaMay 2, 2007 06:2580396
About the caste system [335 words]G.VishvasMay 3, 2007 04:0780396
A spoon full of honey helps the medicine go down [327 words]a hillMay 27, 2007 00:4780396
about responses [91 words]G.VishvasMay 28, 2007 04:0280396
Muslims [112 words]NariAug 18, 2007 22:4780396
Hindus have always been the most tolerant. [61 words]Satish JJan 11, 2012 10:4680396
Allam is 100% Muslim [132 words]Domenico GattiMar 5, 2007 16:3280393
Born a Muslim, always a Muslim, according to the Qur'an [50 words]Mark-Alan WhittleMar 5, 2007 18:4080393
Scrupulous [59 words]Steve BalogMar 5, 2007 15:5980389
reply to Mr.G.Vishvas article May 1 -2007 [510 words]p.rMay 1, 2007 18:4480389
to P. R. [498 words]G.VishvasMay 2, 2007 04:5680389
Reply to Mr. G.Vishvas. [628 words]P.RMay 4, 2007 07:2480389
God and reason [155 words]G.VishvasMay 5, 2007 04:1980389
Shame. [223 words]surjMay 5, 2007 11:3380389
To Mr.Surj and Mr.Vishvas [297 words]P.RMay 6, 2007 05:0680389
Understand each other [215 words]B.K. NambiarMay 13, 2007 04:5380389
PR and safety [125 words]ThiaganApr 3, 2008 07:1880389
PR and safety [314 words]ThiaganApr 5, 2008 00:4480389

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to Hindukush = hindu killer by G.Vishvas

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List


eXTReMe Tracker

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2020 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)