4 readers online now  |  69 million page views

There is no such thing as an "islamist" - their Qur'an calls them "muslims!" And crime-gangs are already illegal.

Reader comment on item: Trump: You Should Ban Islamists, Not Muslims

Submitted by Uncle Vladdi (Canada), Dec 12, 2015 at 00:38

What defines a "muslim?" What is a "muslim" supposed - by their own rules - to do and think, and not to do and not to think? Let's look at their own most sahih (official) scriptures' definitions of "muslims:"

Muhammad, as "Al-Insan al-kamil," is set up by 33.21 and 68.4 as the role model for all Muslims to emulate. He said that he was "raised for Jihad and not for tillage". He said that his provision was placed under the shade of his spear; look it up in Fath al-Bari if you don't know what that means. He said that he was "made victorious with terror". He commanded his followers, speaking for Allah, to "strike terror" and "terrify thereby". He said that Allah would cover the Muslims with a blanket of disgrace if they abandoned Jihad in favor of trade, commerce and agriculture.

The role model for all Muslims to emulate burned the date trees of one Jewish settlement to terrorize them. He terrorized the Jews of Medina by having Kab Ashraf assassinated. He terrorized one Arab tribe into submission by having Asma bint Marwan assassinated. He sent extortion letters to regional rulers threatening to kill them and enslave their children if they did not submit. That is what Islam is; what Muslims do.

The few who will read 8.67, 109.2 and Sahih Bukhari 4.52.164 will know that Allah is not God.

Islam has a standard: Qur'an & Sunnah. Its what Moe said and did according to the oral traditions of his companions. 2.85 prohibits dividing the Qur'an, its all or nothing. 2.216 ordains Jihad for Muslims. 8.39 commands perpetual war against pagans until Allah has a global monopoly. 8.57 & 8.60 command terrorism. 8.67 requires "great slaughter" as Moe's price of admission to Allah's celestial bordello. 9.120 promises Brownie Points for any "step" taken to "injure or enrage" disbelievers. 9.111& 49.15 define believers as those who fight in Allah's cause. 33.21 sets up Moe as a role model for Muslims to emulate. Read the TOC of "The Life Of Muhammad" to see what he did. One attack every six weeks for the last decade of his life.

A Muslim who does not support Jihad including terror as a battle tactic, is a hypocrite, 4.89, not a believer as described in 8.1-5, 9.111& 49.15.

3.110 makes Muslims out to be the "best of peoples for the people". Sahih Bukhari 6.60.80 explains that they are the best as they drag us to Islam with chains on our necks.

Is Muhammad representative of Muslims? Got a clue what he did? Got a clue what he said about terrorism? Got a clue what Allah said about it?

If they sincerely denounce terror, they are hypocrites or apostates, not Muslims. I direct your attention to "Reliance Of The Traveller" o8.0--8.7 which specifies the death penalty for any of a list of 20 attitudes and actions including denial of any part of the Qur'an. In this case 8.12, 57 & 60; 9.111, 120; 33.26-27 & 59.2.

NOW, LET'S LOOK AT WHETHER BANNING "MUSLIMS" IS "UNCONSTITUTIONAL" - OR NOT:

Most basically: Since islam requires its muslim members to adhere to criminal principles which are in direct conflict with the US Constitution, and Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution requires the President elect to take the Oath or Affirmation to: "... preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States" the only sane and logical way to keep that oath, is to REQUIRE the crime-gang of islam be banned!

For instance:

Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion or abridging the free exercise thereof.

Islam demands that it be the only recognized religion, that all others be suppressed.

That contravenes the Constitution.

The first amendment also provides congress shall make no law abridging freedom of speech and press.

Islam demands the death penalty for reviling Allah, Moe or Islam.

Islam contravenes the Constitution.

Art. 6 proscribes religious test for office.

Islamic law requires that all officers be Muslim, declaring that infidels have no right to authority even over infidels.

Islam contravenes the Constitution.

Islam pretends to be the law of universal application, to be imposed upon the entire world by force. 8.39, 9.29 & 9.33 are clues for the clueless. See also Sahih Bukhari 1.8.387.

The Constitution is not a suicide pact. It does not require us to harbor enemy combatants and fifth columns.

Islam is permanent war. In 1778 Barbary Pirates attacked our shipping. Adams & Jefferson asked why and were told it was written in their laws that all who had not submitted to Islam were fair prey. Look up the Barbary Wars at Wikipedia and read the full quote.

The hadith which substantiates that quote is long and convoluted, but when you get to the paydirt, you will recognize it easily. http://www.quranexplorer.com/Hadith/English/Hadith/bukhari/004.053.386.html

Islam is an enemy at war against us, no more protected by the Constitution than Nazism. It can not be tolerated.

Moreover:

Islam was banned from the USA in 1952, but Obama doesn't want you to know that nor does he respect or uphold US law.

The Immigration and Nationality Act passed June 27, 1952 revised the laws relating to immigration, naturalization, and nationality for the United States. That act, which became Public Law 414, established both the law and the intent of Congress regarding the immigration of Aliens to the US and remains in effect today. Among the many issues it covers, one in particular, found in Chapter 2 Section 212, is the prohibition of entry to the US if the Alien belongs to an organization seeking to overthrow the government of the United States by "force, violence, or other unconstitutional means."

This, by its very definition, rules out Islamic immigration to the United States, but this law is being ignored by the White House. Islamic immigration to the US would be prohibited under this law because the Koran, Sharia Law and the Hadith all require complete submission to Islam, which is antithetical to the US government, the Constitution, and to the Republic.

All Muslims who attest that the Koran is their life's guiding principal subscribe to submission to Islam and its form of government.

Now the politically correct crowd would say that Islamists cannot be prohibited from entering the US because Islam is a religion.

Whether it is a religion is immaterial because the law states that Aliens who are affiliated with any "organization" that advocates the overthrow of our government are prohibited.

FINALLY:

U.S. Code ยง 1182 - Inadmissible aliens

(f) Suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by President:

"Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate."

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to There is no such thing as an "islamist" - their Qur'an calls them "muslims!" And crime-gangs are already illegal. by Uncle Vladdi

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List
eXTReMe Tracker

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2020 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)