3 readers online now  |  69 million page views

in theory, yes - in practice, problems

Reader comment on item: Trump: You Should Ban Islamists, Not Muslims

Submitted by Jeffrey (United States), Dec 11, 2015 at 16:55

In theory, you are right that the solution to this problem is that Westerners must distinguish between Islamists and non- or anti-Islamist Muslims. The problem is that even the people working in our government agencies are unable to make these crucial distinctions. You'll recall that several years ago a journalist asked several senior US counterterrorism officials if they knew the difference between Sunni and Shi'a Islam. Not only did most not know the difference, but many argued that this was something they didn't need to know! When one is dealing with that level of egregious ignorance, even with senior officials, it's unrealistic to expect that lower level (say, customs) officials would be able to distinguish between Islamists and regular Muslims, esp. since so many of the former (e.g., from CAIR and the whole network of MB-linked organizations in the US) pose disingenously as moderates.

As every aware person knows, State Dept apparatchiks, the Obama Admin, and elements within the US intell community all seriously seem to believe that the MB is a "moderate" organization, despite all of the evidence to the contrary. Be that as it may, Trump's formulation was, as usual, unnecessarily provocative and counterproductive, but his underlying point is that NO foreign nationals should be allowed into the US without being adequately vetted, a sensible position that most Americans would support.

So why not have a moratorium on all immigration and asylum until such time as more effective vetting procedures are instituted (hopefully including those that may help officials distinguish between Islamists or other fundamentalists and other types of Muslims). The current procedures are completely inadequate to vet legal immigrants (not to mention the problems of unvetted illegal immigrants coming across the border into the US).

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to in theory, yes - in practice, problems by Jeffrey

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List
eXTReMe Tracker

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2020 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)