69 million page views


Reader comment on item: Hezbollah's Victory, Israel's Decline

Submitted by David M. Dastych (Poland), Feb 3, 2004 at 15:05

I don't understand what is the Israeli Government's real purpose to release hundreds of terrorists against a few Israelis (or corpses)? These Islamist fanatics will never stop fighting Israel. It's no use to appease them.

The present Israeli policy seems to be very inconclusive. On one hand, the IDF blows up the houses of the suicide bombers and carries out repressive raids against Arab cities; on the other hand - the Government acts against the national interest, releasing terrorists of the most dangerous groupings. The separation wall is being built to protect Israeli citizens from terrorist intrusions, and Jewish settlement homes are being liquidated.

The Palestinian attacks inside Israel proper (suicide attacks) cause deep psychological effects on the Israeli population (a sense of insecurity in their own country, social depression). If this situation continues, it will inevitably draw Israel into a new Arab-Israeli war.

Overall, it's an absurd situation. As long as Israel has a huge military superiority over the Arabs, the balance of power is in favor of the Jewish State. This superiority should be well exploited to assure security to the Israelis. But the time-factor counts here.

Have you heard of a Russian invention: a miniature neutron weapon? The Putin's administration is continuing the development of mini-nukes that can become an ideal weapon for terrorists (if Russians sell these weapons to them).The device is very small (the size of a football), practically not radioactive, hard to detect. The effect of the explosion is small destruction but strong pulsating neutron wave killing people and all living creatures. If the Palestinian terrorists could acquire such a weapon, Israeli population would be in real danger. I continue to check the information with nuclear scientists, before writing on this subject.

Israel has a nuclear strike capability bigger than France. With the German submarines they have now, Israelis can strike at Iran from the sea, as they struck against Iraq to destroy Saddam's French-built reactor (in the 1980's). But the nuclear might of a state can't prevent small, dispersed attacks by miniaturized nukes or by bio/chemical weapons. Therefore, the sooner that Arafat's "quasi state" be pacified or simply liquidated, the better for Israel and for the Middle East. A regional nuclear war could be a disaster, a doomsday not only for Israel (a small country) but for all Israe's Arab neighbors.

Consequently, Israel should not appease the radicals of Hamas, Hezbollah etc. but destroy them as soon as possible. The World shall protest, but it is insignifcant as long as Israel remains the winner.

The American (Bush's) policy vs. Israel is also full of duplicity: "road maps" don't work at all but are forced upon Israel by the U.S. and a talk about "peace" with a scorpion like has no sense (how many times he has lied?). The U.S. Government must clearly show who is the real ally of the U.S. and who is not. If Israel is an important ally in the Middle East, then all U.S. efforts should be made to assure security to the Jewish State (even if at the Arabs' expense). The moves to ged rid of the Taliban and of Saddam's regime were justified and successful. Why not to liquidate the extremists in the PA? Are they not dangerous enough?

Well, these are my thoughts (after reading of your last column).

Best regards - David M. Dastych
February 3, 2004 Tuesday evening, 08:55 p.m.
in Poland

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (68) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
being able to understand a couple of things [110 words]peter caveFeb 26, 2004 10:0614001
The Tide Has Turned!! [55 words]david cohenFeb 20, 2004 21:5313958
Hezbollah wins one [62 words]Peter J. HerzFeb 12, 2004 04:1413853
SWAP OF DETAINEES [35 words]KHALAF ASKHAROUNFeb 10, 2004 19:2313832
Re:prisoner swap [165 words]Cheryl PineFeb 7, 2004 16:5013801
Factual writer [30 words]Poonam BhatiaFeb 7, 2004 13:3513799
Has Sharon lost his mind? [75 words]Mike HindsFeb 6, 2004 13:1113790
Did the Soldiers Want This Done? [74 words]Pat KunzFeb 6, 2004 11:4813787
How many more?? [120 words]Ray ExleyFeb 6, 2004 00:1913780
Shocked [171 words]Alex M. Bar-Elan (nee Berlin)Feb 5, 2004 20:1213773
"G-d helps those who help themselves" [125 words]Dr. Ed ThompsonFeb 5, 2004 16:4213772
cannot beat israel [15 words]pumaApr 10, 2006 17:5313772
You cut to the heart of it.......and it makes me crazy! [177 words]Judith M. ClassenFeb 5, 2004 16:1813771
Prisoner exchange [345 words]Ronnie GarberFeb 5, 2004 15:3813769
An Excellent analysis of the recent "pathetic" deal between Israel & Hezbollah [67 words]Avrham WeissmanFeb 5, 2004 15:0413768
your excellent commentary on the 'exchange' [305 words]cal hubbardFeb 5, 2004 13:1413764
Hezbollah's Victory,Israel's Decline,Art. No.1505 [127 words]S.C.PandaFeb 5, 2004 04:2313759
The Answer [71 words]jack SweetmanFeb 5, 2004 04:0713758
so simple so true [13 words]Laura MaizelsFeb 5, 2004 02:1413755
"Hezbollah's victory, Israel's Decline" [231 words]Lisette MuradFeb 4, 2004 22:4513753
fair trade? [65 words]Shayne MorrowFeb 4, 2004 16:1113746
Swapping of prisoners [148 words]JeremyFeb 4, 2004 15:2513745
appeasing whom? [169 words]john w mcginelyFeb 4, 2004 13:1213742
Israel has no heart on this matter [342 words]ScotFeb 4, 2004 12:0913741
suicide bombing immediately prior to release? [70 words]rrosenbaumFeb 4, 2004 09:4513737
A Traditional Jewish Solution to the Hizbulla-Israel Prisoner Exchnage [603 words]Bert ZaudererFeb 4, 2004 08:4113735
Negotiating with terrorists [51 words]WaheedFeb 4, 2004 05:5813732
negotiate! [7 words]tamiMar 2, 2006 14:1013732
Where is Israel going to? [453 words]Robert J KennedyFeb 4, 2004 03:1113730
It makes me embarrassed to be Israeli [35 words]Louis GordonFeb 4, 2004 02:3313729
Israel's decline [177 words]Ely SilkFeb 4, 2004 02:2213728
I Agree 100% [90 words]AvrahamFeb 4, 2004 00:1613727
Israel must be crazy [207 words]steve beinartFeb 3, 2004 23:0113725
dan bullseye again [46 words]JERRY BORISFeb 3, 2004 19:4013720
Hezbollah's Victory, Israel's Decline [21 words]Joe Halbach,SrFeb 3, 2004 19:0113718
Exchange of prisoners [54 words]Joanne PrivesFeb 3, 2004 18:0013716
Sharon's selective loss of memory [75 words]David HarrisFeb 3, 2004 15:5613715
Brilliant Expose, Blinded Leaders [86 words]John GlueckFeb 3, 2004 15:5213714
Big and dangerous mistake. [55 words]Ali DashtiFeb 3, 2004 15:2413709
withdrawal from new housing [330 words]Sir Daniel TobinFeb 3, 2004 15:0513708
ISRAEL'S INCONCLUSIVE POLICY [565 words]David M. DastychFeb 3, 2004 15:0513707
You are exactly right [28 words]Martin E. WeinsteinFeb 3, 2004 14:1513706
Republic - Not....... [238 words]MikeFeb 3, 2004 13:4313705
Incredible... [242 words]Janice SentaraFeb 3, 2004 13:2013704
Prisoner swap: three card monte, redux. [249 words]Dov Sussman, Esq.Feb 3, 2004 13:0613703
Israel Practices Self-sacrifice of German Immanuel Kant [470 words]Paul SaundersFeb 3, 2004 12:4113700
Hezbollah's Victory, Israel's Decline [120 words]Jacob SlabiakFeb 3, 2004 12:2613699
Prisoner swap [78 words]Jonathan KeilerFeb 3, 2004 11:3413697
Here's another angle on the ridiculous prisoner swap [98 words]Mark D. GrossFeb 3, 2004 11:2313696
Israel's Decline [17 words]Steve GureFeb 3, 2004 10:5813695
Why? [81 words]rmFeb 3, 2004 10:1213693
Arik Sharon: a tragic loss of focus [78 words]Marvin RabinovitchFeb 3, 2004 10:0413692
Prisoners as future informers? [26 words]JoaquimFeb 3, 2004 09:5613691
Israel wants Tannenbaum [96 words]Steven SternFeb 3, 2004 09:5313690
Hezbollah Victory, I do not think so, Israel's Decline, I do not think so [493 words]Bill JacksonFeb 3, 2004 09:4713689
A demoralizing defeat [165 words]Richard L. RubensteinFeb 3, 2004 09:4313688
Such sadness for Israel [118 words]Kim SegarFeb 3, 2004 09:3913687
hostage swap [247 words]ken schwartzFeb 3, 2004 09:3313686
Terrorism's Victory [112 words]Dr. Arnold (Avi) YoskowitzFeb 3, 2004 09:3213685
Sharon did the right thing [44 words]AMerican Jewish Muslim AllianceFeb 3, 2004 09:2013682
Sacrifice of the Lambs [129 words]Kimberly FergusonFeb 3, 2004 09:2013681
Toward the world of Ahimsa [68 words]IkranagaraFeb 3, 2004 09:1413679
The value of one Jew [53 words]Chaim BelisowskiFeb 3, 2004 09:0513678
Morality- No! Stupidity - Yes! [8 words]Bernard FreedmanFeb 3, 2004 08:5913677
It was not only a moral decision- it was a Jewish one! [197 words]Dona InselbergFeb 3, 2004 08:0913676
SHARON IS A CATASROPHIE! [27 words]PROF. Richard MILLMANFeb 3, 2004 07:5813675

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to ISRAEL'S INCONCLUSIVE POLICY by David M. Dastych

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List
eXTReMe Tracker

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2020 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)