Submitted by Juanita(United States), Dec 28, 2007 at 10:52
How can one suggest that a newspaper whose editor calls for US interference in Israeli affairs in order to push a particular agenda, objective? In fact, the newspaper's articles should be carefully screened for what it pretends is factual.
I have been aware for a long time that the paper is biased and that the bias creeps in into what it reports and how it reports it. When the editor-in-chief is as biased as Landau is, I would consider even the purported facts to be suspect.
Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.