Submitted by Sm(United States), Dec 27, 2007 at 15:08
Mr. Pipes,
1. It is NOT undemocratic to have citizens petition the powers that be to secure reforms within the state. One could argue that it is the essence of a democracy.
2. Intellectuals in other countries would not behave in this manner because most countries do not share the special relationship that Israel and the United States have. The poets were justified because they did the most reasonable thing their conscience permitted them to do.
I agree with you on many issues—especially our controversial views on Islam, which unfortunately separate us from most other thinking people today.
But I thought this inability to understand the opposition was unreasonable of you.
Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.
Daniel Pipes replies:
"It is NOT undemocratic to have citizens petition the powers that be to secure reforms within the state. One could argue that it is the essence of a democracy."
You fail to win the policies you wish for at the ballot box, so you petition other states to impose those policies on your government? Sounds highly un-democratic to me.