Harrak, Pipes' contradiction

Submitted by Infidel (Canada), Nov 14, 2006 at 14:33

Harrak, I've been reading Dr. Pipes' column for several years and have obviously missed the articles you refer to. I'm of course referring to your statement that Dr. Pipes "is able to write something today well argued to the point of convincing, and subsequently, he is able to write something opposite to what he wrote before", and the reader is unable to prove Dr. Pipes' contradiction.

Could you therefore provide a couple of examples of Dr. Pipes' contradictory articles? Of course, Dr. Pipes deception may be so complex and sinister that you may not be able to identify his contradictory articles minutes after reading them. And by the way, you should come out of the philosophical chamber, as it may have a negative effect on your IQ and your ability to understand even simple comments.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".