69 million page views

For Sword: an example..

Reader comment on item: Something Rotten in Denmark?
in response to reader comment: Is this true information about the Muslims ? or is it a conspiracy ?

Submitted by Sarah (Sweden), Mar 28, 2006 at 04:04

(Sword said: You have NEVER answered an accusation. Your response has inevitably been counter-accusation. If you cannot refute an allegation it simply serves to indicate evasion and therefore reinforces the accusation - right or wrong.)

Imagine two boys, Tom and Harry, who were both lame. They met at McDonalds, and Tom shouted at Harry- 'Hey, you're lame'! Now what would be Harry's reaction? Do you expect Harry to say, 'Tom, thank you for your comments but I am not lame, or Tom, please don't make fun of me because I was born that way, or Tom my mother fell off from stairs when I was in her womb and that's why I am lame today'. No, Harry will not say these things.

Harry will just point his finger to Tom and shout, 'You're calling me lame? What are you? Can't you see your own condition?'

You may think Harry is 'being evasive' or his words are just counter-accusation. Whatever you call it, his reply carries a message, and this is surely an answer.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)