69 million page views

Interesting, but:

Reader comment on item: Something Rotten in Denmark?
in response to reader comment: Freedom of speech in Denmark

Submitted by M. al-Content (Portugal), Mar 13, 2006 at 16:56

Interesting, but:
Under Section 140, you might have to prove that the doctrines or worship of Islam had been mocked or insulted. The only genuine cartoon I have seen is clearly a reference to bombings by Muslims. To argue that bombings are acts of doctrine or worship might make for a difficult legal case.

Under Section 266-B, I do not think that two years would be considered long enough for the
Danish Imams to spend considering the error of their ways, and the harm they have caused.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)