Our dear Arche and the corrupted Qur'an!

Submitted by dhimmi no more, Feb 12, 2019 at 06:54

Our dear Arche must be an avid watcher of the videos by the discredited Ahmad Deedat who admitted that he did not speak read or write Arabic and more likely than not did not read the Bible in Hebrew, Aramaic or Greek! And he never read the commentaries by Jewish and Christian theologians about their books. All of the above did not stop him from trying to prove that Islam is a true religion not by telling us what the Qur'an and the books of Islam say. So what did that fraud Ahmad Deedat do? He went after "corrupted" books (The Bible) to prove that Islam is the real thing! And not a single tablighee questioned the stupidities spewed by Ahmad Deedat or the moron Zakir Naik

Does that make any sense to you our dear Arche whose Hindu ancestors were brutalized by Islam?

>It is that Muslims read the Bible and take it as an extension, explanation or accurate portrayal to the Holy Quran

Why is the Qur'an a corrupted book?

1. As I proved to you that your so called Allah defines corruption as: To change the location of the words from their right places. Do you know what this means Mr genius? It means that the Qur'an is a corrupted book by its own definition after all Q96 is supposed to be the first "revealed" Sura! So who moved it to number 96 instead of being the first Sura? What a disaster the Qur'an is a corrupted book.

2. We are told in a hadith that 'Aisha the 6 year old wife of your so called prophet once said that Surat al-Ahzab was as long as Surat al-Baqara! So what happened to all these verses our dear Arche? Where are they?

3. What happened to اية الرجم واية ارضاع الكبير? Oh we know what happened: They were eaten by a hungry goat! What a disaster Allah cannot protect his own words! Oh اية الرجم واية ارضاع الكبير? It means the stoning verse and the breast feeding of the adult. But this means that the Qur'an is a corrupted book

4. We have now the Cairo Qur'an, the Tunisian Qur'an and they are different! One of the two must be correct and the other one is a corrupted Qur'an right Mr genius? It also means that the charlatan Maududi (sp?) must be wrong when he said that not a single word in the Qur'an has been changed

5. We know the story of al-Tabari editing yes editing the Qur'an and even wondering if the word ملك in Surat al-Fatiha is مَلِكِ or is it ماَلِكِ (there are many other examples) but this means that he was editing the Qur'an which means he corrupted the Quran! What a disaster

6. Your so called Allah says that لاتبديل لكلمات الله or no change to the words of Allah. However, the Qur'an was corrupted. More damaging to your claims? Your Allah says that he is the author of the Tawrat wa al-Injil! This means that both books cannot be corrupted because your Allah says: لاتبديل لكلمات الله unless your Allah was not telling the truth that he is the author of these books so was Allah a liar?!

6. More disasters? The Shi'a tell us that the Qur'an is a corrupted book so are they liars?

7. More disasters? The Shi'a tell us that there are 2 chapters missing from the Qur'an سورة النورين وسورة الولاية
So what happened to these two Suras? Were they also eaten by a hungry goat? The real disaster here is the Qur'an is a corrupted book.

8. Your so called Allah says that this life is all about القضاء والقدر or Allah plans every thing! This means that if the Jews and Christians corrupted their books then we must blame Allah! Shame on you brother are you blaming Allah for corrupting his books the Qur'an included? Astaghfirullah!

You see our dear Arche Indian and Pakistani Muslims live in a bizarre world where they follow a religion that is an Arab religion and I feel sorry for them

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".