69 million page views

Pym Fortuyn and Geert Wilders might be alive today if Europeans enjoyed concealed carry rights

Reader comment on item: Which Has More Islamist Terrorism, Europe or America?
in response to reader comment: How do you decide who to fire at?

Submitted by Sully (United States), Jul 4, 2008 at 23:53

Ann made the statement that guns are useless in direct defense, and she is right with respect to some kinds of terrorism. But she is wrong when it comes to one on one "sudden jihad syndrome" type situations. Only the fact that all Europeans are reliably helpless before any nut or fanatic with a knife makes possible the sort of assassinations that Europe has seen.

In addition there is a value in wide gun ownership by law-abiding people because it acts as a deterrent for overreaching by both government and radical groups. There is, of course, a cost to wide gun ownership, just as there is a cost to wide automobile ownership.


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2023 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)