67 readers online now
Homepage Articles Blog Reviews Spoken Books Other Languages Biographical Middle East Forum About this site Mailing List

Latest Articles

 

ADVERTISEMENTS



Premium Links
by Wikio

• Computers
• Electronics
• Communication
• Appliances

eXTReMe Tracker

you have answered your own question
Reader comment on article: The Next London Bombing
in response to reader comment: Typical Ignorance

Submitted by Terry (United States), Oct 27, 2006 at 17:06

Dinesh Patel in his article of last march, answered his own question. He asks why Muslims do not go and live in an Islamic society, since it would be for them paradise on earth. There's the nub of it. World Islam is the goal. It is in fact a pillar of their faith. There is no point in living in a society that is already 'theirs'. The whole object is to go off and first of all colonise, and then 'Islamify' a country not already enlightened with stonings, beheadings, amputations, and all the other myriad delights of Islam. The western democracies are a prime target. Our very democracy allows them to flourish.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited, before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments.

Submit a comment on this article

Other reader comments on this article

Title By Date
To be a "good" Muslim [3701 words]PaulJan 3, 2007 09:10
Wearing the poppy with pride [264 words]TerryNov 2, 2006 15:51
↔ No debate [191 words]TerryNov 3, 2006 18:46
London will burn as the liberals fiddle [569 words]MaggieJul 30, 2005 02:42
↔ Why is that question never answered? [151 words]Dinesh PatelMar 14, 2006 07:30
↔ war is deceit [166 words]donvanNov 6, 2006 09:43
↔ The unanswered question [261 words]TerryNov 6, 2006 17:46
Response to Usman [320 words]MarcJul 29, 2005 06:31
↔ Typical Ignorance [104 words]Dinesh PatelMar 13, 2006 11:47
↔ ⇒ you have answered your own question [112 words]TerryOct 27, 2006 17:06
media [159 words]usmanJul 22, 2005 21:30
↔ response to Usman [292 words]TerryOct 29, 2006 20:10
Response to B. Alotaibi [85 words]DvoraJul 20, 2005 19:22
Bombings [76 words]Jacob BricksJul 18, 2005 07:12
"He was such a good man" [51 words]Hari IyerJul 18, 2005 02:54
scream on No. 30 bus [134 words]Milena BrotskiJul 17, 2005 00:35
numbers [40 words]JasmineJul 15, 2005 16:47
Questions [200 words]Gloria StewartJul 14, 2005 21:27
Right Again [171 words]Dr. Lee D. CaryJul 14, 2005 11:45
Too true [173 words]NeilJul 13, 2005 14:28
British and islam [38 words]norman a blumbergJul 13, 2005 10:44
Response to yonason [204 words]DvoraJul 13, 2005 07:56
Surprising? [196 words]DaisyJul 12, 2005 22:18
BUILDING A FREEWAY TO HEAVEN? or MORAL RELATIVISM TAKES IT'S TOLL? [698 words]yonasonJul 12, 2005 17:56
Daniel, has it occured to you ... [58 words]John BergJul 12, 2005 14:12
↔ its the ..."ism" [135 words]donvanOct 27, 2006 17:01
Britain's extremely small %age of Muslim terrorist activiists." [36 words]GRAHAM RAEL-BROOKJul 12, 2005 13:29
The next London Bombing [52 words]PhillipJul 12, 2005 09:22
But of course! [36 words]Regan HuffmanJul 12, 2005 00:31
waiting for what? [63 words]Laura MaizelsJul 12, 2005 00:24
Dr. Pipes got it Right [186 words]Arlinda DeAngelisJul 11, 2005 20:51
Traps and Targets [240 words]Jacob OlidortJul 11, 2005 20:02
Get used to waffling, myopia and general incompetence [350 words]Reuben HorneJul 11, 2005 19:31
Populace numbers of Muslim extremists vs APD International [473 words]DvoraJul 11, 2005 19:24
additional readings [113 words]tomJul 11, 2005 17:45
Thank you AGAIN [27 words]samuel lehrerJul 11, 2005 16:23
Condemnation [84 words]TANWEER HUSSAINJul 11, 2005 16:02
↔ we have heard it all before [82 words]RickyAug 30, 2006 17:39
↔ MERCY AND JUSTICE [66 words]DONVANOct 27, 2006 16:40
Despair for whose country?? [77 words]charles ziemboJul 11, 2005 15:42
If You Lay Down with Dogs-They'll Eat You Alive [348 words]B. AlotaibiJul 11, 2005 13:58
Young Fundamentalist Muslims & Extremism [30 words]Nathan RosenblattJul 11, 2005 13:41
A "good Muslim" [67 words]JaneJul 11, 2005 13:20
Right on! [198 words]Darwin BarrettJul 11, 2005 12:53
YOUR SUPER STATEMENTS [117 words]Jennifer KingJul 11, 2005 12:26
Islam is the problem [56 words]NameJul 11, 2005 12:21
enemy w/in [69 words]DanJul 11, 2005 11:26
Moslem hedging [154 words]Jerry StolzenbergJul 11, 2005 10:53
In London they were chanting "Death to Tony Blair" for cryin out loud! [112 words]David SmithJul 11, 2005 10:09
↔ exactly [26 words]RickyAug 30, 2006 19:13
Little David was small, but Oh My! [78 words]Howard E, CookJul 11, 2005 10:03
bombers [57 words]Walter E. WallisJul 11, 2005 09:14
Insight [29 words]monty pogodaJul 11, 2005 08:40
The next London bombing [78 words]david rothschildJul 11, 2005 08:39
16.000 [35 words]MatteoJul 11, 2005 08:22
You are wasting your time, Mr. Pipes [195 words]Octavio JohansonJul 11, 2005 08:09
↔ BNP Warning [48 words]Dinesh PatelFeb 9, 2006 10:40
↔ Suicide bombers [283 words]TerryOct 26, 2006 15:33
↔ moderate, peace loving muslims [169 words]donvanOct 27, 2006 15:37
↔ Peaceful law abiding Muslims [248 words]TerryOct 28, 2006 17:45
↔ BEAM ME UP SCOTTY... [83 words]DONVANNov 6, 2006 09:07
Britons urged to commit cultural suicide [690 words]AnthonyJul 11, 2005 07:45
↔ NEW PARTY NEEDED [91 words]Alan RICHARDSONFeb 21, 2006 09:17
↔ new party. [124 words]david coxsonJul 8, 2006 09:48
↔ why? [183 words]RickyAug 30, 2006 17:15
↔ sickness [159 words]katertaif@aol.comNov 5, 2006 18:35
↔ Not with a bang but hardly a whimper [76 words]feinfeinFeb 26, 2007 04:50
↔ So TRUE [65 words]D JonesSep 30, 2007 21:52

Comment on The Next London Bombing

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:
For security, image verification is required to post comments. Please type the characters from the image at right into the field beside it.

Type Text:

 CAPTCHA Image Audible Version

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited, before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments.

Click here to see the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

ADVERTISEMENTS

All materials written by Daniel Pipes on this site ©1979-2009 Daniel Pipes. Email: meqmef@aol.com