53 readers online now

98,675 comments by 26,222 readers

Go to Mobile Site
Homepage Articles Blog Reviews Spoken Books Other Languages Biographical Middle East Forum About this site Mailing List

Latest Articles

 

ADVERTISEMENTS



Premium Links
by Wikio

• Computers
• Electronics
• Communication
• Appliances

eXTReMe Tracker

All non-muslims are peace-loving!
Reader comment on item: NATO Fights the Jihadis
in response to reader comment: NATO's New Field of Operations

Submitted by raheel (United Kingdom), Oct 3, 2006 at 15:34

Christina,

are all jews and christians peace loving? Neither are all muslims, but the majority are. Your tone and language is but one step away from a certain A. Hitler.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (135) on this item

Title By Date
Coalition of Democracies. [40 words]J.HansfordOct 15, 2006 12:03
great idea [76 words]gordoOct 14, 2006 01:34
↔ is this the solution [197 words]deboraFeb 23, 2009 00:41
US contribution [258 words]DarrenOct 13, 2006 18:58
NO NO NO !!! [92 words]dfwhiteOct 11, 2006 16:01
West is losing War against Islamic Terrorism [536 words]CanhaOct 11, 2006 14:20
ISI people boasts of bringing down West [36 words]MuhammadOct 10, 2006 03:32
↔ Reply to Muhammad [56 words]Proud kafirOct 11, 2006 14:24
↔ NATO will continue the fight - Muhammad [ISI boasts of bringing down the west] [138 words]Another AmericanOct 11, 2006 22:56
↔ Easier to destroy than to build [153 words]MuhammadOct 13, 2006 01:57
↔ Need more people thinking like you - Another American! [40 words]JaladhiOct 13, 2006 16:06
↔ Easier to destroy than to build [53 words]Another AmericanOct 13, 2006 17:27
↔ Need more people thinking like you - Another American! [17 words]Another AmericanOct 13, 2006 18:21
↔ Clarification [95 words]MuhammadOct 15, 2006 23:46
↔ Clarification from Muhammad [337 words]Another AmericanOct 17, 2006 23:45
↔ Comment on NATO foghts the jehadis: a reply to Muhammad [187 words]Jaisingh ThakurJul 21, 2007 05:27
↔ Optimism = Reality? [202 words]jennifer solisOct 17, 2007 17:16
↔ Reply - Comment on NATO foghts the jehadis: a reply to Muhammad [365 words]Another AmericanOct 22, 2007 19:29
↔ Not the only choices [70 words]USorThemOct 25, 2007 22:10
What sayest Nato? [289 words]JayOct 8, 2006 23:11
Responding to Suggested New Role for NATO [155 words]Andria SwitzerOct 7, 2006 21:53
Exaggerated scare tactics [493 words]Ghulam Muhammed, MumbaiOct 7, 2006 15:22
Unintended Consequences [102 words]JabanOct 7, 2006 12:15
NATO VS.RADICAL ISLAM'S FRONT SOLDIERS CALLED JIHADISTS [132 words]TTSOct 6, 2006 22:19
"The Pentagon Looks at the Koran" as did President Reagan, 1983" [108 words]Kevin O'ConnellOct 6, 2006 20:24
↔ The crux [176 words]Yuval Brandstetter MDOct 9, 2006 15:35
We need honesty and courage [138 words]G.VishvasOct 5, 2006 10:44
Muslims know [299 words]Thomas Justin KazeOct 5, 2006 02:53
↔ Agree [85 words]RamaOct 8, 2006 13:54
↔ GIVE THEM THEIR OWN CHOICES [29 words]OliverOct 9, 2006 22:14
how could muslim troops defend us against terrorism? [81 words]susanOct 4, 2006 20:03
↔ How could Muslim troops defend against terrorism [361 words]Vinod KumarOct 5, 2006 18:50
↔ Re: Partition [23 words]trans-parereOct 7, 2006 03:13
↔ Another Suicidal step by West [77 words]Indian ChaverOct 9, 2006 14:09
Interesting Proposal [104 words]Bryan JacksonOct 4, 2006 16:11
↔ What about India? [22 words]OutWestOct 5, 2006 04:43
↔ We can't avoid WAR [47 words]OliverOct 9, 2006 22:24
NATA fights the Jihadis [399 words]Paul la DemainOct 4, 2006 14:33
Unequally yoked... [471 words]Neal S Bishop a Bible MinistryOct 4, 2006 11:31
NATO is dying due to political weakness [186 words]OutWestOct 4, 2006 06:41
lebanon war.
[w/response] [62 words]		david headleyOct 4, 2006 02:02
↔ How to take out Iranian Nuclear Facilties : Steps to be taken [305 words]AnjaniOct 9, 2006 13:57
↔ Reply on Anjani's wishful steps to be taken agains Iran [504 words]HarrakOct 9, 2006 23:23
Islamist Extremism or just Islam? [385 words]Caesar ArevaloOct 4, 2006 00:15
↔ Bravo Caesar [101 words]Yuval Brandstetter MDOct 9, 2006 15:45
↔ Yuval Brandstetter MD, Islam religion of peace [18 words]InfidelOct 10, 2006 14:55
↔ missing names [28 words]Yuval Brandstetter MDOct 12, 2006 14:56
NATO & freedom for our future. [253 words]Dale EhrgottOct 3, 2006 23:51
NATO and the camel drivers [18 words]HarrakOct 3, 2006 22:54
NATO is not an internal police force [1049 words]trans-parereOct 3, 2006 21:13
NATO and "liberal" democracies [261 words]Jerry C.Oct 3, 2006 21:02
NATO [2 words]Douglas BoggsOct 3, 2006 20:53
Yes Spain was out, but Portugal was in [93 words]ObserverOct 3, 2006 20:26
NATO may lack the needed unity [437 words]Leo KOct 3, 2006 18:12
↔ Good Idea [79 words]OutWestOct 5, 2006 04:51
Beware of the Faes-cists! [176 words]Pere EscayolOct 3, 2006 17:07
↔ Correct!! [35 words]donvanOct 9, 2006 23:02
purify democracy and the rule of law [462 words]trans-parereOct 3, 2006 17:01
↔ what about israel [83 words]brianNov 9, 2009 09:42
Forum For Fools
[w/response] [46 words]		InfidelOct 3, 2006 16:06
↔ Nuclear Armed Islamic Iran & Pakistan are far more dangerous than Nuclear Armed North Korea [303 words]VinayOct 9, 2006 13:35
↔ Blow hards [111 words]dfwhiteOct 9, 2006 16:50
↔ Start hitting Indian and US nuclear installations [26 words]ShubhobrotoJun 16, 2009 01:08
NATO's New Field of Operations [249 words]ChristinaOct 3, 2006 14:48
↔ ⇒ All non-muslims are peace-loving! [30 words]raheelOct 3, 2006 15:34
↔ Good job [8 words]mikeOct 3, 2006 15:41
↔ "All...." [163 words]donvanOct 3, 2006 16:21
↔ Donavan, What is a Mohammedian [52 words]InfidelOct 3, 2006 17:11
↔ "majority" of muslims peace-loving? [5 words]SadhasivOct 4, 2006 09:49
↔ Really ? [19 words]BudapestOct 4, 2006 13:59
↔ i'm with you on this one infidel!! [130 words]ahmad zafireOct 4, 2006 22:48
↔ SO GLAD YOU ASKED [131 words]DONVANOct 5, 2006 10:10
↔ "mohammedian" drivel [102 words]raheelOct 5, 2006 16:39
↔ gun worship [106 words]raheelOct 5, 2006 17:36
↔ some further elaboration... [225 words]donvanOct 5, 2006 21:45
↔ Donvan, So sorry I asked [183 words]InfidelOct 6, 2006 01:32
↔ To Infidel "Donavan, What is a Mohammedian?" [9 words]Proud kafirOct 6, 2006 10:49
↔ Ahmad, Harrak Allah's Miracles [199 words]InfidelOct 6, 2006 15:34
↔ equality [56 words]raheelOct 6, 2006 17:35
↔ Mr Akber [201 words]RamaOct 8, 2006 14:11
↔ Minority... [73 words]DONVANOct 9, 2006 09:16
↔ in fidelis [225 words]donvanOct 9, 2006 22:16
↔ Mohammedism.. [102 words]DONVANOct 9, 2006 22:50
↔ ELEPHANT SURRAT -PICTURE- of 2006 [62 words]HarrakOct 10, 2006 17:20
↔ Harrak's complex comments [45 words]InfidelOct 10, 2006 20:23
↔ donovan [27 words]ahmad zafireOct 11, 2006 09:58
↔ My point exactly..... [228 words]DONVANOct 12, 2006 09:34
↔ ooops North Corea not Morth Corea Mr Jesusist [135 words]HarrakOct 13, 2006 10:02
↔ DONVAN my point.... [53 words]ahmad zafireOct 14, 2006 10:16
↔ Hello Raheel [153 words]ChristinaOct 15, 2006 13:00
↔ Right... [97 words]donvanOct 16, 2006 09:34
↔ donvan [176 words]ahmadzafireOct 17, 2006 09:41
First Class! [9 words]Abu NudnikOct 3, 2006 14:39
afghanistan [124 words]michael cOct 3, 2006 13:29
↔ Afghanistan - a reality lesson [98 words]Alan BrownOct 4, 2006 12:19
↔ The Peace Dividend is being Collected [91 words]OutWestOct 5, 2006 05:00
↔ Paying for the Peace Dividend in Blood [85 words]OutWestOct 5, 2006 05:05
structurally problematic. [147 words]michael rosenbergOct 3, 2006 13:01
Exactly... [290 words]Edgar Malcolm ErvinOct 3, 2006 12:21
↔ End of the World [103 words]raheel khokharOct 3, 2006 15:47
↔ RAHEEL [93 words]Edgar Malcolm ErvinOct 3, 2006 18:50
↔ THINK, MAN THINK [83 words]dfwhiteOct 3, 2006 18:59
↔ RAHEEL [127 words]Edgar Malcolm ErvinOct 3, 2006 19:07
↔ So you think. [41 words]yaelOct 4, 2006 09:41
↔ Therefore?? [89 words]Another InfidelOct 5, 2006 02:03
↔ vile terrorism [117 words]raheelOct 5, 2006 16:51
↔ top dog! [141 words]raheelOct 5, 2006 17:06
↔ peace without appeasement [135 words]raheelOct 5, 2006 17:20
↔ the end of all things [60 words]raheelOct 5, 2006 17:28
↔ who should wage what war? [233 words]Anubhav SinghOct 6, 2006 02:25
↔ TOP DOG [161 words]dfwhiteOct 6, 2006 15:35
↔ peace in our time? [168 words]raheelOct 6, 2006 17:20
↔ American pride [66 words]raheelOct 6, 2006 17:41
↔ protest! [7 words]raheelOct 6, 2006 17:45
↔ raheel hits the nail on the head [175 words]Charles FortnerOct 6, 2006 22:52
↔ Peace in our time - Yes with your attitude!! [188 words]Another InfidelOct 7, 2006 03:18
↔ RAHEEL [236 words]Edgar Malcolm ErvinOct 7, 2006 17:10
↔ the future [130 words]raheelOct 10, 2006 17:00
↔ radical?!! [141 words]raheelOct 10, 2006 17:11
↔ lost in the darkness [127 words]raheelOct 10, 2006 17:20
↔ RAHEEL [249 words]Edgar Malcolm ErvinOct 22, 2006 00:46
↔ MERRY XMAS!!! [101 words]raheelDec 18, 2006 16:26
↔ ALL MY BEST... [159 words]Edgar Malcolm ErvinDec 19, 2006 19:26
New mission for NATO [58 words]Lloyd KleinOct 3, 2006 11:34
↔ nation states [33 words]raheel khokharOct 3, 2006 15:27
A "Shadow" UN [40 words]Michael JoyceOct 3, 2006 11:25
Boldness from windbags? [63 words]David W. LincolnOct 3, 2006 10:47
Spain proves NATO is not the right tool [399 words]PatOct 3, 2006 10:25
↔ response to Pat [103 words]raheel khokharOct 3, 2006 15:23
↔ A step in the right direction [338 words]Maggie4LifeOct 4, 2006 01:57
↔ NATO today is less than the sum of its parts [242 words]PatOct 4, 2006 16:26
Oh, Wow! [63 words]Howard E. CookOct 3, 2006 09:13
Taiwan and others in NATO? Alternative UN? [451 words]Peter HerzOct 3, 2006 07:14
↔ NATO retooled [30 words]Robert JohnOct 4, 2006 13:52
↔ It's a fig leaf. [115 words]PatOct 7, 2006 18:20

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

ADVERTISEMENTS

All materials written by Daniel Pipes on this site © Daniel Pipes. Email: MeqMef@aol.com

You can help support Daniel Pipes' important work by making a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.