39 readers online now

98,582 comments by 26,202 readers

Go to Mobile Site
Homepage Articles Blog Reviews Spoken Books Other Languages Biographical Middle East Forum About this site Mailing List

Latest Articles

 

ADVERTISEMENTS



Premium Links
by Wikio

• Computers
• Electronics
• Communication
• Appliances

eXTReMe Tracker

The ball is not in Sharon's court
Reader comment on item: Ariel Sharon, Escapist

Submitted by David W. Lincoln (Canada), Nov 29, 2005 at 12:49

When you have blatant avoidance of very real issues, what we see each time is the prelude to collapse.

As long as the Arabs in the Gaza Strip and in Judea and Samaria are more interested in destruction than building a society, what any Israeli party does, or proposes, is peripheral at best.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (33) on this item

Title By Date
sharons'second creation [134 words]leo solomonDec 1, 2005 13:40
Conclusion beats Premise [124 words]Diego FramatoDec 1, 2005 13:35
Sharon - The Israeli Gaius Marius [136 words]The HistorianDec 1, 2005 00:04
Likud marries Labor [219 words]JayNov 30, 2005 21:31
Not a good analogy [198 words]JoshuaNov 30, 2005 12:04
Short-lived? Perhaps. Dangerous? Certainly! [99 words]Josh GNov 30, 2005 08:49
Tabula Rasa [321 words]yuval brandstetterNov 29, 2005 17:01
Shas - escapist par excellence [68 words]David GuyNov 29, 2005 15:25
⇒ The ball is not in Sharon's court [52 words]David W. LincolnNov 29, 2005 12:49
An Annex of the U.S.? [160 words]Jack LassNov 29, 2005 11:47
↔ Response to Jack Lass's Annex of US [169 words]ubangiNov 29, 2005 21:58
New Party [92 words]Thomas Earl CannadyNov 29, 2005 10:43
History won't repeat itself [32 words]Efrat YaariNov 29, 2005 05:24
Kadima: Sharon's Ego Party [142 words]Frederick J. Bainhauer IIINov 29, 2005 01:09
Read Revelation 22: 18-19 [88 words]Dale EhrgottNov 28, 2005 23:41
Short but maybe not so sweet [83 words]ubangiNov 28, 2005 21:37
What is good for the country [107 words]BATYA DAGANNov 28, 2005 21:33
Unprincipled, Self-Centrist, Communist Sharon [247 words]orange yonasonNov 28, 2005 21:24
Sharon's 'Great Leap Leftwards' predicted by Dr.Pipes [79 words]Ben van de PolderNov 28, 2005 20:27
Ariel Sharon [148 words]Arlinda DeAngelisNov 28, 2005 20:18
↔ Reply To Arlinda DeAngelis [278 words]Mu'een Ud DeenNov 29, 2005 16:13
Baruch Hashem! [338 words]John W. McGinleyNov 28, 2005 19:57
Kadima [9 words]Roger W. TalbotNov 28, 2005 17:22
Selective facts make for questionable analysis [155 words]Yair WeinstockNov 28, 2005 17:10
Future of Kadima [137 words]steven lNov 28, 2005 16:43
Sharon is the issue, not his party [272 words]Jean SavoyeNov 28, 2005 16:30
Labor is Escapist [46 words]Gamaliel IsaacNov 28, 2005 16:29
escapist parties [63 words]george glanczNov 28, 2005 15:55
"Escapist", Sharon [26 words]Rabbi Jerome AbramsNov 28, 2005 15:50
I agree with your 2-nd point only conditionally. [52 words]agNov 28, 2005 15:41
Ariel Sharon, a deeply flawed individual [358 words]Kenneth S. BesigNov 28, 2005 14:49
Sharon is a centrist , not an escapist (as in disengagement) [32 words]Kalman NeumanNov 28, 2005 14:49
Thank you, Dr.Pipes... [160 words]Merle C. FraserNov 28, 2005 14:48

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

ADVERTISEMENTS

All materials written by Daniel Pipes on this site © Daniel Pipes. Email: meqmef@aol.com