67 readers online now

98,582 comments by 26,202 readers

Go to Mobile Site

Latest Articles

 

ADVERTISEMENTS



Premium Links
by Wikio

Computers
Electronics
Communication
Appliances

eXTReMe Tracker

Is Democracy the Answer?
Reader comment on item: Defending and Advancing Freedom

Submitted by Reuben Horne (Australia), Nov 6, 2005 at 06:56

Dr Pipes,
Others who have not agreed with me in the past have touted George W Bush as a compassionate conservative to a mostly blind and left wing media mentally poisoned audience and I see much of that here - GW Bush under attack from those who have no solutions and would cause only greater problems with their philosophies of retreat and surrender. Nonetheless some of the things they say touch upon pertinent truths.

Democracy has acted as a catapult upon which we have shot many of our paradigms (both technological and cultural) ahead in the west. However we have maintained it under circumstances that have been deletoriously negative with unlegislated restictions on race and religion that have operated even within the shining jewel of democracy (America).

How much easier would it be then for muslims even within the paradigm of a democracy to maintain their destructive and violent prejudices against other religions or beliefs. Or to use Democracy's technical flexibility to create even more potent weapons both technical and political to assail our borders and our very selves. Turkey after its internal democratisation moved to commit massacres such as the Armenian genocide that other Islamic powers would struggle (at least in recent times) to live up to if bent against the aforementioned in a perverse comparative atrocity contest.

Attack the cancer at its source. Irresposible and unmerited violent expansion at the expense of all can occur within the context of a democracy - and has been used ultimately to supplant democracy. Look at the ineptitude of the French in answering the multicultural catastrophe they have brought into existence through their own stupidity. It is darkly humorous after their PC digs at G W Bush through a recent ressurrected Asterix cartoon in which the Americans were portrayed as Mickey Mouse resembling invaders in Iraq (I wonder what the invaders in their own country will be drawn like in 20 odd years - possibly not at all since they may very well be running the place).

I can recall the confident words of a Muslim immigrant referring to her own philosophy's ability to convert whatever paradigm it encounters to suit its own purposes in reaffirming the belief that the western country she had migrated to would be "her" own within a few decades. "Her" own but not "my" own.

In short adding a democracy to the Middle East may just be adding another weapon to an inevitable enemies arsenal. My own solution: instead of engagement - isolation, instead of aid - starvation and instead of dialogue - time out. Give Islam a few decades or even centuries on its own to contemplate itself and see what conclusions it reaches - we might be surprised. Already the Pakistanis are on track to a few hard truths: they dance in the streets when we are bombed and killed and yet now have misgivings when they don't recieve enough aid in the light of their earthquake. All they need to establish is a connection between the two and they will have centuries more insight into their actions relative to any other Islamic country.

Cordially,
Reuben Horne.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (46) on this item

Title By Date
Nuclear Proliferation—Options In A Perfect Storm [122 words]David J. JonssonNov 7, 2006 14:17
Fight back or die? [312 words]John BellusciMar 6, 2006 13:22
To B, re Muhammad article [17 words]AmiraDec 7, 2005 00:10
Re: mohamed.m/ Amira/ Dr. Pipes [35 words]BDec 5, 2005 14:00
The West's dilemma considering Islamic extremism [258 words]J.B.Nov 29, 2005 17:47
response to Walter [1087 words]a Filipino liberalNov 22, 2005 04:30
Response to Filipino Liberal [71 words]WalterNov 21, 2005 16:19
talk about the irony [781 words]a Filipino liberalNov 21, 2005 04:13
to mohamed.m [48 words]mlusNov 16, 2005 14:32
To Amira re Mohamed M's comment [46 words]SophieNov 11, 2005 16:56
To Muhammad M. [36 words]AmiraNov 11, 2005 00:41
الإسترايجية الناجحة [556 words]mohamed.mNov 10, 2005 11:51
On pre-emption and premature "democracy" [360 words]john h. rubelNov 8, 2005 14:24
Promulgating Freedom [186 words]JerryNov 8, 2005 12:26
Response to David [108 words]WalterNov 8, 2005 02:53
U.S foreign policy [40 words]Michael ByrneNov 8, 2005 00:25
Paradox - frightened great white north [151 words]DAVIDNov 7, 2005 16:58
Response to Walter's comments [14 words]Merry WhitneyNov 6, 2005 13:35
⇒ Is Democracy the Answer? [520 words]Reuben HorneNov 6, 2005 06:56
Peace without USA [358 words]WalterNov 5, 2005 21:18
Cruel Irreligious Piety-Titus Andronicus [100 words]Charles FortnerNov 5, 2005 08:20
Armegeddon may not wait for 22 years [354 words]Robert H. Tyrka Sr.Nov 4, 2005 10:57
Freedom does not work with Islamic countries [510 words]f.shakkiNov 3, 2005 22:18
It's Food For Thought, But ... [71 words]Jeanie KennedyNov 3, 2005 22:16
Answering Commentary's 4 Questions [3370 words]Bill NarveyNov 3, 2005 20:56
Interim rule in Iraq
[w/response] [37 words]
Joe DefezNov 3, 2005 16:03
It's the Insurgents [91 words]WalterNov 3, 2005 14:32
Collective Security - what is needed! [55 words]David W. LincolnNov 3, 2005 13:16
Defending Democracy and Freedom [395 words]Ed GordonNov 3, 2005 12:54
Preemption & Democracy in 22 Years [218 words]Raymond S. KraftNov 3, 2005 10:53
22 years before democracy
[w/response] [52 words]
Robert H. Tyrka Sr.Nov 3, 2005 10:01
Two Sayings [43 words]Monty PogodaNov 3, 2005 07:22
where's the words? [228 words]Simon DavisNov 3, 2005 01:17
Is motivation relevant? [252 words]YochevedMiriam RussoNov 3, 2005 00:24
Preemption and Democracy [69 words]Yvonne lawNov 2, 2005 20:35
Take a breath Kim [170 words]John GiannascaNov 2, 2005 18:07
First, spread democracy in the blue states [208 words]Merry WhitneyNov 2, 2005 17:32
Preemption and democracy [317 words]Donald W. BalesNov 2, 2005 16:12
Let's consider deterrent. [201 words]Jason PappasNov 2, 2005 15:55
Israel acted in self-defense in 1967 [96 words]Ken GoldNov 2, 2005 14:59
Advancing Freedom [154 words]Dr. Lee D. CaryNov 2, 2005 14:46
Defending and Advancing Freedom. [839 words]Kim SegarNov 2, 2005 14:31
Bush Doctrine [270 words]Lamar CarnesNov 2, 2005 14:14
Time is of the essence [382 words]John A. RosadoNov 2, 2005 13:48
No policing [11 words]Gary MillerNov 2, 2005 12:37
Israeli "preemption" in 1967 [132 words]Don RadlauerNov 2, 2005 12:34

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

ADVERTISEMENTS

All materials written by Daniel Pipes on this site © Daniel Pipes. Email: meqmef@aol.com