Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

Fight back or die?
Reader comment on item: Defending and Advancing Freedom

Submitted by John Bellusci (United States), Mar 6, 2006 at 13:22

I am probably a little late commenting on this article, but I refuse to stay silent.

I have read most of the "feedback" on this article and see comments from a Filipino, a "Rational Individualist", and a Muslim and so on. The one thread that runs through all of the comments is the idea that in a global society individual rights and freedoms are at the forefront of any decision. That is ludicrous and the very reason that the war in Iraq is being fought. Saddam, bin Laden, Hitler etc. all believed that they could impose their ideas and extremist values on their people and the rest of the world. They tried to subjugate the people of their world.

However, French, German, Russian, and most freedom loving people do not seem to understand that in order to keep individual rights and freedoms you have to remove all semblances of those who wish to force religion and social views that run contrary to freedom. Yes, I said REMOVE ALL SEMBLANCES. You can not live in a global world of individual rights and freedoms with a few people running around killing you and forcing their views on you. You can not contain for a very long time cancer in the body. Eventually, it will consume the WEAKER parts of the body and kill it. If you believe that Jihadists should have the same individual rights as other free people to impose their faith and moral views; and that it is wrong to bring war to any people or government that does those things, then you have to be willing to give up your individualism and expect to one day be subjugated.

The British and American version of democracy is not the purest form of rule, but it does afford the most people with the most individual rights.

John B
Author of Byte Back and Mouth-to-Mouth
Caliente, CA

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (46) on this item

Title By Date
Nuclear Proliferation—Options In A Perfect Storm [122 words]David J. JonssonNov 7, 2006 14:17
⇒ Fight back or die? [312 words]John BellusciMar 6, 2006 13:22
To B, re Muhammad article [17 words]AmiraDec 7, 2005 00:10
Re: mohamed.m/ Amira/ Dr. Pipes [35 words]BDec 5, 2005 14:00
The West's dilemma considering Islamic extremism [258 words]J.B.Nov 29, 2005 17:47
response to Walter [1087 words]a Filipino liberalNov 22, 2005 04:30
Response to Filipino Liberal [71 words]WalterNov 21, 2005 16:19
talk about the irony [781 words]a Filipino liberalNov 21, 2005 04:13
to mohamed.m [48 words]mlusNov 16, 2005 14:32
To Amira re Mohamed M's comment [46 words]SophieNov 11, 2005 16:56
To Muhammad M. [36 words]AmiraNov 11, 2005 00:41
الإسترايجية الناجحة [556 words]mohamed.mNov 10, 2005 11:51
On pre-emption and premature "democracy" [360 words]john h. rubelNov 8, 2005 14:24
Promulgating Freedom [186 words]JerryNov 8, 2005 12:26
Response to David [108 words]WalterNov 8, 2005 02:53
U.S foreign policy [40 words]Michael ByrneNov 8, 2005 00:25
Paradox - frightened great white north [151 words]DAVIDNov 7, 2005 16:58
Response to Walter's comments [14 words]Merry WhitneyNov 6, 2005 13:35
Is Democracy the Answer? [520 words]Reuben HorneNov 6, 2005 06:56
Peace without USA [358 words]WalterNov 5, 2005 21:18
Cruel Irreligious Piety-Titus Andronicus [100 words]Charles FortnerNov 5, 2005 08:20
Armegeddon may not wait for 22 years [354 words]Robert H. Tyrka Sr.Nov 4, 2005 10:57
Freedom does not work with Islamic countries [510 words]f.shakkiNov 3, 2005 22:18
It's Food For Thought, But ... [71 words]Jeanie KennedyNov 3, 2005 22:16
Answering Commentary's 4 Questions [3370 words]Bill NarveyNov 3, 2005 20:56
Interim rule in Iraq
[w/response] [37 words]
Joe DefezNov 3, 2005 16:03
It's the Insurgents [91 words]WalterNov 3, 2005 14:32
Collective Security - what is needed! [55 words]David W. LincolnNov 3, 2005 13:16
Defending Democracy and Freedom [395 words]Ed GordonNov 3, 2005 12:54
Preemption & Democracy in 22 Years [218 words]Raymond S. KraftNov 3, 2005 10:53
22 years before democracy
[w/response] [52 words]
Robert H. Tyrka Sr.Nov 3, 2005 10:01
Two Sayings [43 words]Monty PogodaNov 3, 2005 07:22
where's the words? [228 words]Simon DavisNov 3, 2005 01:17
Is motivation relevant? [252 words]YochevedMiriam RussoNov 3, 2005 00:24
Preemption and Democracy [69 words]Yvonne lawNov 2, 2005 20:35
Take a breath Kim [170 words]John GiannascaNov 2, 2005 18:07
First, spread democracy in the blue states [208 words]Merry WhitneyNov 2, 2005 17:32
Preemption and democracy [317 words]Donald W. BalesNov 2, 2005 16:12
Let's consider deterrent. [201 words]Jason PappasNov 2, 2005 15:55
Israel acted in self-defense in 1967 [96 words]Ken GoldNov 2, 2005 14:59
Advancing Freedom [154 words]Dr. Lee D. CaryNov 2, 2005 14:46
Defending and Advancing Freedom. [839 words]Kim SegarNov 2, 2005 14:31
Bush Doctrine [270 words]Lamar CarnesNov 2, 2005 14:14
Time is of the essence [382 words]John A. RosadoNov 2, 2005 13:48
No policing [11 words]Gary MillerNov 2, 2005 12:37
Israeli "preemption" in 1967 [132 words]Don RadlauerNov 2, 2005 12:34

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page