44 readers online now

98,559 comments by 26,197 readers

Go to Mobile Site

Latest Articles

 

ADVERTISEMENTS



Premium Links
by Wikio

Computers
Electronics
Communication
Appliances

eXTReMe Tracker

Freedom does not work with Islamic countries
Reader comment on item: Defending and Advancing Freedom

Submitted by f.shakki (United States), Nov 3, 2005 at 22:18

Islamic countries have some minorities, Christians and Jews. These minorities were majorities in their countries before.
The reason was that the Moslems are free to use any savage way to conver them to Islam.That is freedom to the Moslems.
The Arabs invaded these countries 600 hundreds years ago and established religious dictatorship based on their religion to control the people in these conquered countries.

Their dictatorship was based on ruling by Islam through one person related to the their prophet or a strong man who could kill his opponents. Their history is full of bloody battles between each other for ruling. The important thing to these countries is Islam and no more. What ever Islam says, the rulers should implement to satisfy the Moslems people. No freedom is in Islam and no human rights also. So if you are a Moslem and you want to change your religion, Islam says you will be killed or go back to Islam.

In Islam, women have less brain than men and the man allowed slapping and hitting his wife because she belongs to him. Woman can not inherit as much as man because she is not wothy as man. In Islam, the Moslems are higher rank than the infidels and the infidels are ranked as monkeys. Therefore, infidels do not deserve any mercy and Moslems are allowed to get the properties, wife's and children to them self as a gain. By Islam, the Moslems do not accept infidels to be boss on them . The Moslem boss can do what he wants to his subordinates the Moslems but the Moslem subordinates will never accept an infidel to even boss them.
Moslems grow up on this Islamic way and pass this way to the next generation and will never accept something different.

Through complying with Islam, the invaders (the Arabs) put terror in the hearts of the people and convert a great amount of them and Moslems became majority in every Icountry they invaded. Tthese Moslem countries look at the West and America as countries of infidels and in their hearts they want to take over the West and America to spread Islam by all means. Spread of Islam is an order to the Moslems by their God.

Iraq will accept Sadam Hussein to kill them or rule them but will never accept the infidel to introduce any thing different from Islam.
The freedom to Moslems has different meaning. It means that them is spreading Islam to the minorities by all means and spreading Islam to the West. Islam is what the Moslems want.

In Egypt, complying with the American request, the president let the Moslem extremists out of prisons and they are starting to tighten the grip on the Christian minority. There is no freedom to the Christians but all the freedom is to the extremists to hurt the Christians.
The Moslem people are different from the whole world because they act according to Islam.

If America wants freedom to the Christians and Jews in Moslem countries, she has to ask and defend them by economic pressure on these countries.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (46) on this item

Title By Date
Nuclear Proliferation—Options In A Perfect Storm [122 words]David J. JonssonNov 7, 2006 14:17
Fight back or die? [312 words]John BellusciMar 6, 2006 13:22
To B, re Muhammad article [17 words]AmiraDec 7, 2005 00:10
Re: mohamed.m/ Amira/ Dr. Pipes [35 words]BDec 5, 2005 14:00
The West's dilemma considering Islamic extremism [258 words]J.B.Nov 29, 2005 17:47
response to Walter [1087 words]a Filipino liberalNov 22, 2005 04:30
Response to Filipino Liberal [71 words]WalterNov 21, 2005 16:19
talk about the irony [781 words]a Filipino liberalNov 21, 2005 04:13
to mohamed.m [48 words]mlusNov 16, 2005 14:32
To Amira re Mohamed M's comment [46 words]SophieNov 11, 2005 16:56
To Muhammad M. [36 words]AmiraNov 11, 2005 00:41
الإسترايجية الناجحة [556 words]mohamed.mNov 10, 2005 11:51
On pre-emption and premature "democracy" [360 words]john h. rubelNov 8, 2005 14:24
Promulgating Freedom [186 words]JerryNov 8, 2005 12:26
Response to David [108 words]WalterNov 8, 2005 02:53
U.S foreign policy [40 words]Michael ByrneNov 8, 2005 00:25
Paradox - frightened great white north [151 words]DAVIDNov 7, 2005 16:58
Response to Walter's comments [14 words]Merry WhitneyNov 6, 2005 13:35
Is Democracy the Answer? [520 words]Reuben HorneNov 6, 2005 06:56
Peace without USA [358 words]WalterNov 5, 2005 21:18
Cruel Irreligious Piety-Titus Andronicus [100 words]Charles FortnerNov 5, 2005 08:20
Armegeddon may not wait for 22 years [354 words]Robert H. Tyrka Sr.Nov 4, 2005 10:57
⇒ Freedom does not work with Islamic countries [510 words]f.shakkiNov 3, 2005 22:18
It's Food For Thought, But ... [71 words]Jeanie KennedyNov 3, 2005 22:16
Answering Commentary's 4 Questions [3370 words]Bill NarveyNov 3, 2005 20:56
Interim rule in Iraq
[w/response] [37 words]
Joe DefezNov 3, 2005 16:03
It's the Insurgents [91 words]WalterNov 3, 2005 14:32
Collective Security - what is needed! [55 words]David W. LincolnNov 3, 2005 13:16
Defending Democracy and Freedom [395 words]Ed GordonNov 3, 2005 12:54
Preemption & Democracy in 22 Years [218 words]Raymond S. KraftNov 3, 2005 10:53
22 years before democracy
[w/response] [52 words]
Robert H. Tyrka Sr.Nov 3, 2005 10:01
Two Sayings [43 words]Monty PogodaNov 3, 2005 07:22
where's the words? [228 words]Simon DavisNov 3, 2005 01:17
Is motivation relevant? [252 words]YochevedMiriam RussoNov 3, 2005 00:24
Preemption and Democracy [69 words]Yvonne lawNov 2, 2005 20:35
Take a breath Kim [170 words]John GiannascaNov 2, 2005 18:07
First, spread democracy in the blue states [208 words]Merry WhitneyNov 2, 2005 17:32
Preemption and democracy [317 words]Donald W. BalesNov 2, 2005 16:12
Let's consider deterrent. [201 words]Jason PappasNov 2, 2005 15:55
Israel acted in self-defense in 1967 [96 words]Ken GoldNov 2, 2005 14:59
Advancing Freedom [154 words]Dr. Lee D. CaryNov 2, 2005 14:46
Defending and Advancing Freedom. [839 words]Kim SegarNov 2, 2005 14:31
Bush Doctrine [270 words]Lamar CarnesNov 2, 2005 14:14
Time is of the essence [382 words]John A. RosadoNov 2, 2005 13:48
No policing [11 words]Gary MillerNov 2, 2005 12:37
Israeli "preemption" in 1967 [132 words]Don RadlauerNov 2, 2005 12:34

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

ADVERTISEMENTS

All materials written by Daniel Pipes on this site © Daniel Pipes. Email: meqmef@aol.com