head in the sand
Reader comment on item: Enforce Islamic Law in Canada?

Submitted by Elpi Nipmi (United States), Sep 28, 2005 at 09:42

In the soon to be Eurabia, the biggest accomplice of Islam is Liberal media. Their crime is, to this day, misinforming the masses of the TRUTH. It may be that is too late to fix anything out in the "liberal domain" over there, and Europe is at the point of no return. Liberal media in Canada is the same kind of accomplice in the service of Islam. I could not see any differnce between Canada and Europe, both entities had chosen to bury their head in the sand. Avoiding and denying the TRUTH about the intentions of Islam, in 'dar el harb'.

The same fate will be in the U.S. Liberal media in the U.S. is self loathing. Convinced that America is the bad guy, helping radical islamo-fascist to believe that western civilization is on the point of breaking up. Unfortunaely, voices of reason does not make a difference, for the sole reason of the apathy of the masses in the U.S.. The biggest noise makers and the worst truth distorters is Liberal media. All of Liberal media prefer to succomb to Muslim pressure, and by that they are helping and supporting the TERRORISTS. Talking about Muslim "sensitivities". Where were Muslim "sensitivities" on 9/11 in New York, where were they in Madrid, where were they in London, Where were they in Beslan or in Israel on a daily basis, or in Lebanon, in Bally, in Africa. The list is just too long.

One clever man, had defined the most influential newspaper in The U.S., the New York Times, as Pravda in lingery. The Enemy within, that is what i call this dreaded publication with all of its branches.
Muslims, for real, are "sensitivie" when you refuse to let them kill you. Cause, you know, they got a license to kill the rest of us, straight from Allah. Their wish to enforce the Shari'a is the ultimate goal of Islamio-fascists, and if the west will keep refusing to acknowledge that truth, Islam will win at the end.
thank you, Elpi Nipni

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.