43 readers online now

98,582 comments by 26,202 readers

Go to Mobile Site

Latest Articles

 

ADVERTISEMENTS



Premium Links
by Wikio

Computers
Electronics
Communication
Appliances

eXTReMe Tracker

Gaza is not Israel
Reader comment on item: The Forcible Removal of Israelis from Gaza

Submitted by Rony Guldmann (United States), Apr 29, 2005 at 09:30

What many of the Gaza settlers seem to have forgotten is that Gaza is not Israel, but merely Israeli-occupied territory. This is not merely the view of the Palestinians, but of the Israeli government itself, which has never annexed Gaza. Annexing Gaza would give its Arab residents the vote, which no Israeli, including the settlers, want. The more fanatical of the settlers want to have it both ways. They want that they, the settlers, be treated as though Gaza was Israel, yet they do not the Palestinians to be so treated. This is because they wish not merely to live in Gaza but to rule over it. While they may criticize Sharon's decision in pragmatic terms, as a weakening of Israel's strategic position, the truth is that they would insist in remaining in Gaza even if Hamas became Gandhi-like, and they would also insist that Gaza's Arab residents either leave or resign themselves to permanent second-class citizenship.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (56) on this item

Title By Date
Injun Country [182 words]Harold BrackmanMay 3, 2005 11:35
⇒ Gaza is not Israel [157 words]Rony GuldmannApr 29, 2005 09:30
Czechoslovakia in 1938 [205 words]Jaroslav FlidrApr 26, 2005 10:24
Moderation is not to be found among the weak [294 words]Constantine KipnisApr 23, 2005 02:03
The Muslims were not Cleansed from India [98 words]Rishi DwivediApr 14, 2005 13:31
Sinai [19 words]BucephalusApr 13, 2005 18:04
Historic precedents are of limited importance... [118 words]Avner ReggevApr 13, 2005 16:04
Moving folks [48 words]bill travisApr 13, 2005 13:09
Beyond Unprecedented Folly: The Long And The Short Of It [107 words]yonasonApr 13, 2005 11:04
Unprecedented [67 words]Jonathan LadenApr 13, 2005 10:27
Sharon's mistakes [147 words]Sherry OrbachApr 13, 2005 08:34
"Muslims in India in 1947" [209 words]Rajiv KaulApr 13, 2005 02:53
Give the settlers a choice? [132 words]Kalman NeumanApr 13, 2005 01:43
Responsibility [167 words]Dan FendelApr 12, 2005 23:01
Gaza: MY eyes have been opened [225 words]Jerry DriverApr 12, 2005 21:51
History, International Law, and the 'Land of Israel' [1172 words]yonasonApr 12, 2005 21:19
"Israel should...." [163 words]Robert ArbetmanApr 12, 2005 20:45
Japanese internment [160 words]AlanApr 12, 2005 19:15
Gaza [111 words]Paul RinderleApr 12, 2005 15:23
Disengagement from Gaza Strip [41 words]Darr YossiApr 12, 2005 13:05
SENSIBLE REASON FOR DISENGAGEMENT [91 words]Bob BreslauerApr 12, 2005 10:42
What about Maale Adumim [60 words]StanApr 12, 2005 10:29
Only One Precedent [138 words]Elisha IgnatoffApr 12, 2005 09:59
Similar case [179 words]Petter NikulaApr 12, 2005 09:30
Is the Forcible Removal of Israelis from Gaza Unprecedented? [36 words]Mr. M. DunskyApr 12, 2005 08:52
A Jewish State [212 words]Info Tech GuyApr 12, 2005 08:10
The cost-benefit analysis [99 words]Octavio JohansonApr 12, 2005 07:45
Clearances [71 words]Ron IrvineApr 12, 2005 07:40
There is a precedent for forcible removal [483 words]Sha'i ben-TekoaApr 12, 2005 06:29
Giving away Gaza [87 words]Moshe MoserApr 12, 2005 04:18
Historic partnership [44 words]Marvin RabinovitchApr 12, 2005 03:54
Forcible removal of Israelis from gaza [100 words]Walter TeutschApr 12, 2005 03:38
The right way, the wrong way, and the Israeli way! [269 words]Kenneth S. BesigApr 12, 2005 03:32
Eminent domain and other legalese [312 words]B. KopsteinApr 12, 2005 01:00
Who owns the land? [89 words]James Richard SpriggsApr 11, 2005 23:55
Mormons forcibly removed from Missouri in 1838 and Illinois in 1846 [184 words]B. LambApr 11, 2005 23:36
In defence of Sharon [427 words]Fred NahasapetalanApr 11, 2005 23:08
Removal of Citizens [35 words]William HassiepenApr 11, 2005 21:42
Re: Eminent domain [143 words]Gideon KannerApr 11, 2005 20:40
Point vs. Position
[w/response] [147 words]
MartinApr 11, 2005 20:25
Gaza v West Bank [93 words]john w. mcginleyApr 11, 2005 19:41
Japanese Interment Compared to Gaza Withdrawal [256 words]Edwin S. FujinakaApr 11, 2005 19:28
The uprooting of Israelis in Gaza has a precedent in the Sinai [168 words]Jason JungreisApr 11, 2005 19:11
Ariel Sharon's Folly and Reader Comments [169 words]Jacob SlabiakApr 11, 2005 18:54
Do the right thing [123 words]Octavio JohansonApr 11, 2005 18:52
Gaza [77 words]Frank StarkApr 11, 2005 18:42
Is the Forcible Removal of Israelis from Gaza Unprecedented? [62 words]AnitaMaria ParollaApr 11, 2005 18:18
Destruction of settler's homes in Gaza [26 words]Judah RosenApr 11, 2005 18:04
You are right about no precedent on Gaza pull out [263 words]Muriel EfronApr 11, 2005 17:53
Forcible Removal Precedent [16 words]Bruce KauffmanApr 11, 2005 17:01
Unprecedented forced removal [163 words]OscarApr 11, 2005 16:51
False analogy [176 words]Michael RaduApr 11, 2005 16:47
Removal from Gaza: Jews or Israelis? [57 words]Jack GoldbergApr 11, 2005 16:46
Removal of Israelis from Gaza [228 words]Don SkupskyApr 11, 2005 16:01
Hypocrasy: Palestinians living in Israel [157 words]Rob JamesApr 11, 2005 15:56
Jews should rightfully get Israel [64 words]Arianna CanfieldOct 15, 2007 17:12

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

ADVERTISEMENTS

All materials written by Daniel Pipes on this site © Daniel Pipes. Email: meqmef@aol.com