The uprooting of Israelis in Gaza has a precedent in the Sinai

Submitted by Jason Jungreis (United States), Apr 11, 2005 at 19:11

I believe the uprooting of Israelis in Gaza does indeed have a precedent: the uprooting of Israelis in the Sinai. Aside from the mere existence of this precedent, I also believe this is a valuable example of how good can come from such a drastic measure, as Israel gained an honored peace treaty with Egypt through the Sinai evacuation.

Yet there is a marked dissimilarity between the Gaza and Sinai evacuations: Gaza is being undertaken unilaterally and without benefit of a peace treaty "trade." I believe that while this is extremely unfortunate, it does not necessarily undermine the wisdom of the Gaza evacuation: first, Gaza's Israelis are either militarily indefensible or only defensible at tremendous cost; second, after the Israelis are evacuated Israel is no longer under any obligation to treat Gaza's Arab residents with any deference -- if Gaza Arabs undertake any offense against Israel, Gaza may now fairly be treated as foreign enemy territory and its resident combatants can be appropriately addressed through severe military response.

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".