69 million page views

There is a precedent for forcible removal

Reader comment on item: The Forcible Removal of Israelis from Gaza

Submitted by Sha'i ben-Tekoa (Israel), Apr 12, 2005 at 06:29

In September 1783, at Versailles, Benjamin Franklin, John Jay and John Adams signed the Treaty of Versailles ending the American Revolution.

A month later in New York, the Continental Congress passed a resolution ordering all approximately 100,000 Indians out of the Northwest Territories (north and west of the Ohio River) to clear out, because those 5,000,000 acres (eventuallythe states of OH, IND, ILL, MI and a piece of WISC) had been ceded to the new USA as part of the peace agreement with England.

Of course no civilized person anywhere called this "ethnic cleansing." It was a perfectly normal thing to do, the way of the world, especially since during the Revolution the Indians had been on the British side, with at least one reputable historian estimating that more American settlers were killed on the frontier in Indian raids against civilians than rebel soldiers in uniform who fell in the Continental Army in the more famous and formal battles with the Redcoats.

These raids were commonly ambush attacks on settler families in which everyone was slaughtered - old, young, women, children. Not for nothing were the Indians called "merciless..savages," and the Crown hated for launching them against settlers, which language is to be found in the Declaration of Independence, whose principle author was of course the Father of American Liberalism, Thos. Jefferson.

The following spring of '84, in Annapolis, when Congress convened to ratify the peace treaty with England,it appointed Jefferson to design an administration for the newly acquired spoils of war called the Northwest Territory, which he did, and which design did not foresee the presence of Indians because they had been ordered to clear out - which they had yet to do. Jefferson envisioned an "empire of liberty" beginning with the settling of pioneer Americans in the new territory.

However, because the Indians had yet to go; and because the British were still in their forts in the wilderness supplying them with guns and ammunition and encouraging them to resist the the advance of American settlers and settlements; and because with demobilization the US Army had only a few hundred soldiers, Congress forbade Americans to cross the Ohio and settle because they could not be defended. And re-igniting bloodshed with England was a possibility no one wanted.

Hence the US Army was detailed to cross the Ohio River in this period of the 1780s and 1790s to drive the settlers back across the river and burn down their settlements because the country was incapable of protecting them - yet.

Not that yours truly - an Israeli settler himself - supports Sharon's "Drive the Jews from Their Homes Plan." Only that there is an historical American precedent - but also an historical American precedent for doing what Israel has never done, viz. annex Judea, Samaria and Gaza - like the Northwest Territory - as the legitimate spoils of war, and to order the enemy therein out!

Sha'i ben-Tekoa
www.deprogramprogram.com
Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (60) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
Injun Country [182 words]Harold BrackmanMay 3, 2005 11:3521961
Gaza is not Israel [157 words]Rony GuldmannApr 29, 2005 09:3021885
Czechoslovakia in 1938 [205 words]Jaroslav FlidrApr 26, 2005 10:2421824
Moderation is not to be found among the weak [294 words]Constantine KipnisApr 23, 2005 02:0321773
1The Muslims were not Cleansed from India [98 words]Rishi DwivediApr 14, 2005 13:3121656
Sinai [19 words]BucephalusApr 13, 2005 18:0421642
Historic precedents are of limited importance... [118 words]Avner ReggevApr 13, 2005 16:0421637
Moving folks [48 words]bill travisApr 13, 2005 13:0921628
Beyond Unprecedented Folly: The Long And The Short Of It [107 words]yonasonApr 13, 2005 11:0421623
Unprecedented [67 words]Jonathan LadenApr 13, 2005 10:2721621
Sharon's mistakes [147 words]Sherry OApr 13, 2005 08:3421616
9"Muslims in India in 1947" [209 words]Rajiv KaulApr 13, 2005 02:5321605
Hindu population [48 words]Tapas DattaApr 8, 2017 12:0421605
Give the settlers a choice? [132 words]Kalman NeumanApr 13, 2005 01:4321604
Responsibility [167 words]Dan FendelApr 12, 2005 23:0121599
Gaza: MY eyes have been opened [225 words]Jerry DriverApr 12, 2005 21:5121595
2History, International Law, and the 'Land of Israel' [1172 words]yonasonApr 12, 2005 21:1921594
JERUSALEM [66 words]ANDREAApr 26, 2010 17:3921594
God's Promise [275 words]CNMay 28, 2010 05:1921594
Stern gang / Lehi = 100% secular [127 words]MoisesJul 7, 2020 21:0621594
"Israel should...." [163 words]Robert ArbetmanApr 12, 2005 20:4521591
Japanese internment [160 words]AlanApr 12, 2005 19:1521587
Gaza [111 words]Paul RinderleApr 12, 2005 15:2321577
Disengagement from Gaza Strip [41 words]Darr YossiApr 12, 2005 13:0521570
SENSIBLE REASON FOR DISENGAGEMENT [91 words]Bob BreslauerApr 12, 2005 10:4221565
What about Maale Adumim [60 words]StanApr 12, 2005 10:2921564
Only One Precedent [138 words]Elisha IgnatoffApr 12, 2005 09:5921563
Similar case [179 words]Petter NikulaApr 12, 2005 09:3021562
Is the Forcible Removal of Israelis from Gaza Unprecedented? [36 words]Mr. M. DunskyApr 12, 2005 08:5221561
A Jewish State [212 words]Info Tech GuyApr 12, 2005 08:1021560
The cost-benefit analysis [99 words]Octavio JohansonApr 12, 2005 07:4521559
Clearances [71 words]Ron IrvineApr 12, 2005 07:4021558
There is a precedent for forcible removal [483 words]Sha'i ben-TekoaApr 12, 2005 06:2921557
Giving away Gaza [87 words]Moshe MoserApr 12, 2005 04:1821554
Historic partnership [44 words]Marvin RabinovitchApr 12, 2005 03:5421553
Forcible removal of Israelis from gaza [100 words]Walter TeutschApr 12, 2005 03:3821552
The right way, the wrong way, and the Israeli way! [269 words]Kenneth S. BesigApr 12, 2005 03:3221551
Eminent domain and other legalese [312 words]B. KopsteinApr 12, 2005 01:0021546
Who owns the land? [89 words]James Richard SpriggsApr 11, 2005 23:5521544
Mormons forcibly removed from Missouri in 1838 and Illinois in 1846 [184 words]B. LambApr 11, 2005 23:3621543
In defence of Sharon [427 words]Fred NahasapetalanApr 11, 2005 23:0821541
Removal of Citizens [35 words]William HassiepenApr 11, 2005 21:4221538
Re: Eminent domain [143 words]Gideon KannerApr 11, 2005 20:4021535
Point vs. Position [147 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
MartinApr 11, 2005 20:2521534
Gaza v West Bank [93 words]john w. mcginleyApr 11, 2005 19:4121532
Japanese Interment Compared to Gaza Withdrawal [256 words]Edwin S. FujinakaApr 11, 2005 19:2821531
The uprooting of Israelis in Gaza has a precedent in the Sinai [168 words]Jason JungreisApr 11, 2005 19:1121530
Ariel Sharon's Folly and Reader Comments [169 words]Jacob SlabiakApr 11, 2005 18:5421529
Do the right thing [123 words]Octavio JohansonApr 11, 2005 18:5221528
Gaza [77 words]Frank StarkApr 11, 2005 18:4221527
Is the Forcible Removal of Israelis from Gaza Unprecedented? [62 words]AnitaMaria ParollaApr 11, 2005 18:1821526
Destruction of settler's homes in Gaza [26 words]Judah RosenApr 11, 2005 18:0421525
You are right about no precedent on Gaza pull out [263 words]Muriel EfronApr 11, 2005 17:5321523
Forcible Removal Precedent [16 words]Bruce KauffmanApr 11, 2005 17:0121522
Unprecedented forced removal [163 words]OscarApr 11, 2005 16:5121521
False analogy [176 words]Michael RaduApr 11, 2005 16:4721520
Removal from Gaza: Jews or Israelis? [57 words]Jack GoldbergApr 11, 2005 16:4621519
Removal of Israelis from Gaza [228 words]Don SkupskyApr 11, 2005 16:0121517
Hypocrasy: Palestinians living in Israel [157 words]Rob JamesApr 11, 2005 15:5621516
Jews should rightfully get Israel [64 words]Arianna CanfieldOct 15, 2007 17:1221516

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)