3 readers online now  |  69 million page views

Oh dear . . .more avoidance?

Reader comment on item: Philadelphia's Burqa Crisis
in response to reader comment: It seems that Muhammad's name was really قثم بن عبد اللات or Quthm bin abd al-Lat!

Submitted by Amin Riaz (United Kingdom), Mar 13, 2013 at 19:23

Ha ha ha ha . . . . up to the old tricks again.

Post a bit of Arabic and pretend - that you are answering to something.

- - -

Do point out - what bit exactly is claiming to be the name of Prophet Muhammad?

As to:

"وفي حديث المبعث : أنت قثم ، أنت المقفى ، أنت الحاشر ، هذه أسماء النبي سيدنا رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم . "

In the Hadith Mubhath - You are Qutham, You are Maqfah, You are Hashir, these are names of the Prophet Peace Be Upon Him.

And that is what this short statement says!

http://www.islam786.com/99namesofmuhammad.htm

- - -

Wow! Such shameless lying . . . open lies.

- - -

"

قثم : قثم الشيء يقثمه قثما واقتثمه : جمعه واجترفه ، ويقال : قثام ، أي : اقثم ، مطرد "

This is a dictionary entry. . . 3 classical Arabic dictionaries such as Taj al Aroos - Qamoos Mahit (albeit smaller than the other two) - Lisan al-Arab

They are entries on the ROOT Qa THa Ma - and also consider the name QUtham - as it is from this origin.

- - -

"And if you can read Arabic this is what they tell us in islamweb about this disaster if you can read Arabic"

These are your usual petty, and childish lies. . . . why don't you paste this up at the Arabic Forum . . . .and then see the response.

Wait! BS becomes exposed. Oh dear. . .

- - -

"What a disaster there ain't no Muhammad I'm not the one who is saying that it is your islamic sources so e-mail them and tell them that you our dear Amin the lost tablighee disagree with them"

Ha ha ha ha - see this what being signed up to Westernism does to you. . . all other morality is slowly dying. Hence, why lying is no longer sinful to you.

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to Oh dear . . .more avoidance? by Amin Riaz

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List
eXTReMe Tracker

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2020 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)