4 readers online now  |  69 million page views

800,000 Hindus can't be wrong

Reader comment on item: Sarah Palin Endorses 'Bomb Iran'
in response to reader comment: My answers to Grand Infidel

Submitted by the Grand Infidel of Kaffiristan (Australia), Feb 23, 2010 at 05:17

Mr. bannerjee writes:

My Answer >>> My surname's spelling is Banerjee not Bannerjee. Try to look at my surname's spelling before you type.

You stick to Urdu - I'll use my own language the way I want.

My Answer >>> So you do not like any non-white , non-Australian calling you 'mate' . Is that word 'mate' your paternal property ? I can use any word that I would like to use. Understand.

Understand what I said - you're already a bad enough joke being a muslim - adding slang from another country to try and ingratiate yourself to the readers - makes you appear an even bigger loser. It's quite funny really.

Again - let's deal with facts. The 2006 war was started by Muslim Hezbollah, no doubt acting under orders from allah.".....The conflict began when Hezbollah militants fired rockets at Israeli border towns as a diversion for an anti-tank missile attack on two armored Humvees patrolling the Israeli side of the border fence"

"........My Answer >>> Well you are sidestepping the question I asked you in the first place. Tell me again was it moral for Bush to give a green light to the Israeli invasion of Lebanon which killed thousands of innocent Lebanese civilians ?

The Israelis were provoked into action. They would have gone in with or without Bush's approval - so it is a moot point.

"...My Answer >>>> What exactly do you see as myth when it comes to the Burqas ?"

Burqas? Burqas actually do exist, unfortunately for so many non-deodorised women in hot muslim sandboxes.

My Answer >>>> When you compare Egypt and India to the US regarding last 200 years you should know that both these countries were under western colonial rule for a significant amount of time in the last 200 years. The resources of these two countries were looted by the Westerners during that time.

And both civilisations are older than 5,000 years - plenty of time in which to succeed. So what happened. And what resources did the USA, which is the country we were discussing, take from India and Egypt exactly.?

Now coming back to the modern times do you really want me to believe that there are no poor people in the US ? Come on do not joke.

There are poor people in every country. But most of the poor in the US have colour TV's. Most of the poor in your country just manage to get enough to eat each day. There is a huge difference between being poor in the US and being poor in India. That is so obvious - but you don't seem to realise that.

"...People like Henry Kissinger , Bill Clinton and Al Gore have won Nobel prizes whereas some one like Mahatma Gandhi did not receive the Nobel prize"

The Norwegian Nobel Committee confirmed that Mahatma Gandhi was nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize in 1937, 1938, 1939, 1947 and, finally, a few days before he was murdered in January 1948.The omission has been publicly regretted by later members of the Nobel Committee.

".... My question to you is the Nobel prize is a thoroughly western concept and Muslims should not care too much about it."

That is a statement of your opinion, not a question. No wonder muslims don't get Nobel prizes. Nobel prizes aren't awarded based on race or religion but on developments in many fields which require a great deal of dedication and work by an individual.

"My Answer >>> The number of slaves that Arabs had was a miniscule compared to the Atlantic Slave trade performed by the westerners."

A bit of taqiyya there - or is it kitman? They SOLD slaves to Westerners so had to have them to sell.

".. Also one of the major companions of Prophet Mohammad was Bilal the Ethiopian , an African slave who was released from his bondage by Abu Bakr the first Caliph of Islam."

Was this before or after Mohamhead flew around on the buraq? Or spl;it the moon with his finger without the Chinses or Indians noticing?

"...Another fact of the matter , Bible also talks about slavery a lot in very favourable terms. Why are you intentionally forgetting it ?"

As mentioned before - the Old Testament is seen as more or less an historical document. Some of the events and practices of the people living in the middle east in those times (>2000 years BP) were barbaric. Nothing much has changed - but Christians and jews have moved on. Christians and Jews do not use that book to justify child sex or singling out anyone of any other religions for unjust or inhumane treatment. OR use it to justify suicude bombings of non-jews and non-Christians.

My Answer >>> Your support of nuclear holocaust of the Japanese is racist. "

Did I say I supported it? If anything I said it was the lesser of two evils . So how on earth does that make me 'racist'? Would it have been 'racist' if I said that I'm glad that Germany was also defeated????

Pathetic. Muslims are always ready to start name calling when they have no argument.

Should I have said I preferred the US had not used the atomic bomb and that millions of people should have prolonged their suffering and died slowly from starvation , burns and wounds - apart from those who would have been bombed with conventional explosives???

".....You support it since you consider that Japanese are sub-humans who can be disposed off . "

Now - exactly when and where did I say that?

My Answer >>> The point here is not that Mossadeq government was secular . The point is do you support the interference of the US in the domestic political situation of another sovereign country ?

Russia and China , all the great powers interfere in each others affairs all the time. This has been going on for a hundreds of years. Even Britain interfered in the US.

"If you do support it then I would say Muslims will be justified in interfering in the internal affairs of US , Israel and Australia et al."

Sorry to burst your bubble but this is the inconsequential opinion of an insignificant muslim living in a developing country - who doesn't realise that Muslims are not a government. Many of them are a rabble of ignorant fools with a chip on their shoulders - and many of the most seriously deranged motivated by the lie of a perpetual sexual afterlife. A group of muslims who thought to interfere in our affairs here in Australia were recently jailed for 25 years or more.

US participation was at the request of the Vietnamese government

".....My Answer >>> Another blatant lie of yours."

That is a fact.

"....The South Vietnamese government was a US puppet regime which was imposed upon the people of south Vietnam. The Vietcong were justified in taking up arms against that puppet regime so as to unite their country and free Vietnam"

You even believe your own lies? I'm so surprised! Ask ANY person from the multitude of South Vietnamese now living in Western countries what the real story was.

"...from the scourge that is Western imperialism."

Now who is being 'racist'???

I said "...., backing the brutal dictatorships in the Muslim world "

You said "Such as where - Iran? Pakistan? Egypt? Indonesia?"

"My Answer >>> All the places that you mentioned has or had a pro-US , anti-freedom dictatorship. Example the Brutal Shah regime in Iran , the recurrent military dictatorships in Pakistan , the corrupt Suharto regime in Indonesia and the current tyrannical Mubarak regime in Egypt are / were backed to the hilt by the US."

Many muslim countries are brutal miltary or theocratic dictatorships - not backed by any foreign powers (except Saudi)

"" Even now the US supports anti-freedom governments in the Muslim world such as the ones in Saudi Arabia,Egypt,Kuwait and Jordan. I hope this is enough for you."
Anti-freedom in the Muslim world?? What a joke.The Muslim world itself is anti freedom.

" You cannot blame the Muslims in trying to defend themselves from their US occupiers in places like Iraq or Afghanistan. "

and I can't blame NATO when ignorant Afghan muslims blow up schools and bridges built for them by NATO? Muslim society is pretty much a tribal society in those areas. They want to keep what they had - and don't like it when they are offered assistance from outside. BUt in Iraq and Afghanistan - NATO and the US is asked to stay there by the governments of those countries. Why is that? Do they fear the slide back into chaos?

".....Now the question is even if we do consider that the Muslims who are imprisoned in Guantanamo Bay are bad people "

Could that be even possible.?

".....What right do the US have in preventing a proper civilian trial to these people ? "

Because the crimes they committed were not carried out in a civilian setting - they were crimes committed in a 'theatre of war'. Hence they are under military jurisdiction.

"Do you think it is democratic for a country like the US which claims to be democratic."

What on earth are you talking about? What has the USA being a democracy got to do with which branch of law eemy combatabnts are tried under??? No Nobel Prizes for jurisprudence for you.

How about countries and religious fanatics instituting and wanting to institute a retarded politico/religious system with draconian punishments for what they consider to be crimes ?

My Answer >>> Exactly. Countries like the US and Israel which have been built on retarded religious supremacist ideas like American exceptionalism in case of the US

Is 'American exceptionalism' like 'Russian exceptionalism', or 'Chinese exceptionalism' - or even 'Indian exceptionalism'?? Are these religions? Keep to the subject. If somehow we could get 6 billion people to vote on the most retarded religion - guess which one would get the vote from 4.8 billion people?? Too hard for you? Need a hint?

"I also would like to request you to visit places like Bradford in the UK or the suburbs of France and then ask them whom they like most the US or the Islamic world ."

Despite what you'd like to believe the Muslim ghettoes of Bradford in the UK and certain suburbs of Paris - are not typical of the citizens of those countries. far from it.

My Answer >>> Well in the US there are a lot of Americans who are from Muslim background also. Do you believe then that the Muslim world and the US also have lots of things in common.

Love of money perhaps but not race or religion.

In proportion to the overall population - there is a very small percentage of muslims (of all sects) in the US. The numbers of actual or nominal Christian and Jewish Europeans in Russia is a high percentage - as it is in the US.

"On the question of similarities between Roman Catholics and Russian Orthodox I think you do not know anything about Christian religion. "

I like this - muslims lecturing Westerners on their own religions!

If these two religions had lots of things in common then why they did not melt together in the last 100 years ?"

Probably similar reasons that the Sunnis and Shias haven't managed to do that in the last 1600. Although - you have to give the Russian Orthodox and Roman Catholics credit for not suicide bombinh each oter's churches don't you think?

Another point on Russians being white Europeans I guess as a WASP (White Anglo Saxon Protestant)

you live in a fantasy world of groundless assumptions. BUt I knew that already

"you should also understand that Chechens are also White Europeans."

I would say that technically Chechens are more closely related to Iranians etc.

" Does that mean that Chechens are also closely related to the Americans ?"

It does not mean that at all.

'Talking about WWII you must admit that the Soviets did the bulk of fighting during that war. So should the Europeans not remember them also ?'

Why 'must' I admit to a lie? They did the bulk of the fighting in their own country .

"My Answer >>> Talking about 9/11 , that incident actually made US do quite a lot of things like Guantanamo Bay and Abu Gharib which lets the world know that US is not that beacon of freedom it claims. It also tells the world that US is not an exceptional nation like any other empire it also does nasty things to hold onto power."

So you expect any country to sit back and take any muslim attack without any reaction. You've been in the sun too long I'm afraid. If anything - the US and other countries have shown great restraint. It's not that they can't wipe out those societies which breed such poison.

.

My Answer >>> See the Muslim world has seen of empires like the Byzantines , the Persians , the Crussaders , the Mongols as well as the modern European colonists. I tell you what without a total collapse of the current world system there will be no new power coming out. "

Again, the opinion of an insignificant person steeped in his beliefs. And you could say the Jewish world ahs seen even more empires come and go with even more validity. Is a 'total collapse of the current world system' (whatever vague definition you have for that) - is necessary for a 'muslim' world to appear ??? The irony is the muslim world has already collapsed - and collapses further day by day. There never , ever will be a future muslim world utopia, sad as that may be for you to hear.

It is becoming impossible for Islam to ignore what everyone else sees quite clearly.

My Answer >>> Internet also helps in other ways like helping the world to know and understand the evil deeds of America and spread opposition to this unjust American system like wildfire.

You are being delusional again - there is no 'unjust American system ' being spread - neither here in Australia - or in Lithuania - or Russia or Liechtenstein or Moldova or Paraguay ....etc

Tell you what the world with each passing day is coming to know about ISLAMIC atrocities all around the world and people are starting to organize against it."


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submitting....

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (114) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
How would this solve anything? [60 words]DavidFeb 24, 2010 15:22169359
Compromise [59 words]Albrecht KleinFeb 26, 2010 10:12169359
Another war is surely not the best option. [590 words]HansMar 1, 2010 18:46169359
argument [439 words]HansMar 5, 2010 20:30169359
To Hans [149 words]Seamus Dafydd Dives MacNemiMar 28, 2010 15:44169359
To Mr. MacNemi [203 words]HansApr 5, 2010 13:37169359
To Hans [212 words]Seamus Dafydd Dives MacNemiApr 6, 2010 01:06169359
Palin reading [28 words]TajFeb 23, 2010 21:11169340
To Taj [5 words]Seamus Dafydd Dives MacNemiMar 28, 2010 15:48169340
Bomb Iran? [11 words]aussiFeb 18, 2010 18:09169138
...Nothing to brag about [212 words]jaFeb 12, 2010 23:49168845
I pray for Sarah Palin to be the next President of the USA [59 words]Debanjan BanerjeeFeb 14, 2010 12:47168845
1whose fault? [350 words]the Grand Infidel of KafiristanFeb 14, 2010 16:00168845
Our dear Deb and Sara Palin [286 words]dhimmi no moreFeb 14, 2010 17:37168845
Reply to Grand Infidel [950 words]Debanjan BanerjeeFeb 17, 2010 02:00168845
Don't be so hasty... [246 words]KMSFeb 18, 2010 14:50168845
1comments- Mr. Bannerjee [1998 words]the Grand Infidel of KafiristanFeb 18, 2010 23:45168845
2Our dear Deb and charity starts at home! Read and laugh [748 words]dhimmi no moreFeb 20, 2010 08:40168845
My answers to Grand Infidel [2446 words]Debanjan BanerjeeFeb 21, 2010 03:48168845
2Islam and slavery and al-3abeed wa al-barabra [413 words]dhimmi no moreFeb 21, 2010 14:21168845
1800,000 Hindus can't be wrong [2427 words]the Grand Infidel of KaffiristanFeb 23, 2010 05:17168845
My response to DNM [381 words]Debanjan BanerjeeFeb 24, 2010 10:59168845
More answers to GIoK [465 words]Debanjan BanerjeeFeb 24, 2010 11:49168845
More responses to the GIoK [419 words]Debanjan BanerjeeFeb 24, 2010 12:53168845
1still helping the ungrateful [771 words]the Grand Infidel of KaffiristanFeb 26, 2010 03:06168845
1muslims responsible for any crimes? Surely not [811 words]the Grand Infidel of KaffiristanFeb 26, 2010 03:35168845
1Our dear Deb islam and slavery and gem time [1149 words]dhimmi no moreFeb 26, 2010 07:21168845
1Our dear Deb I'm still waiting for your reference that "the number of slaves that Arabs had was miniscule" These are your words [112 words]dhimmi no moreFeb 27, 2010 14:29168845
It's mathematics... [95 words]Debanjan BanerjeeMar 2, 2010 11:21168845
1Our dear Deb I'm still waiting for your reference that "the number of slaves that Arabs had was miniscule" part duex [234 words]dhimmi no moreMar 4, 2010 17:49168845
1Our dear Deb and this time Abul Qasim's last sermon [177 words]dhimmi no moreMar 5, 2010 07:30168845
To DNM [39 words]Debanjan BanerjeeMar 7, 2010 01:20168845
1Muhamma'd's last sermon and the islamic comedy goes on and on [97 words]dhimmi no moreMar 7, 2010 12:34168845
1To Ja [148 words]Seamus Dafydd Dives MacNemiMar 28, 2010 16:03168845
1To Debanjan Banerjee [18 words]Seamus Dafydd Dives MacNemiMar 28, 2010 16:07168845
1Hey Dhimmi No More-- How's tricks?? [33 words]Seamus Dafydd Dives MacNemiMar 28, 2010 16:15168845
1To Debanjan Banerjee [170 words]Seamus Dafydd Dives MacNemiMar 28, 2010 16:42168845
2To Mr. Banerjee---- A solution to your problem [58 words]Seamus Dafydd Dives MacNemiMar 28, 2010 17:22168845
1To Mr. Banerjee [108 words]Seamus Dafydd Dives MacNemiMar 28, 2010 18:20168845
A reply to Seamus Dafydd Dives MacNemi [73 words]Debanjan BanerjeeMar 31, 2010 01:52168845
More to Seamus Dafydd Dives MacNemi [157 words]Debanjan BanerjeeMar 31, 2010 02:01168845
More to Seamus Dafydd Dives MacNemi [73 words]Debanjan BanerjeeMar 31, 2010 02:23168845
1Hey Debanjan [53 words]Seamus Dafydd Dives MacNemiApr 1, 2010 04:41168845
1Hey Debanjan [112 words]Seamus Dafydd Dives MacNemiApr 1, 2010 04:50168845
1Hey Mr.Banerjee [43 words]Seamus Dafydd Dives MacNemiApr 1, 2010 04:55168845
My reply to Seamus Dafydd Dives MacNemi [153 words]Debanjan BanerjeeApr 2, 2010 05:09168845
1Our dear Deb and speaking of cults and the Islamic comedy goes on and on [201 words]dhimmi no moreApr 2, 2010 15:21168845
Answer to DNM [58 words]Debanjan BanerjeeApr 3, 2010 23:25168845
1Ah my dear Debanjan [331 words]Seamus Dafydd Dives MacNemiApr 6, 2010 00:40168845
1Our dear Deb and speaking of cults and the Islamic comedy goes on and on part deux [375 words]dhimmi no moreApr 6, 2010 07:20168845
Epiphany [37 words]Michael RosenbergFeb 12, 2010 13:19168833
1Congratulations Iranian Revolution! [33 words]pdmFeb 12, 2010 11:39168830
1Young and Attractive-Maybe? [243 words]Jay1Feb 12, 2010 00:12168815
Israel will not need Palin endorsement [232 words]LazmanFeb 11, 2010 23:05168813
Isn't There a Catch as to Why No Other Country Except Israel Considers a First Strike a Good Option? [155 words]M. ToveyFeb 11, 2010 19:46168807
The MSM and Sarah Palin [35 words]DavidFeb 10, 2010 23:39168773
The time is over we need to act NOW. [174 words]Peter KikareasFeb 10, 2010 23:01168772
Whitehouse motives and key to Palin's victory [146 words]Ron SingerFeb 10, 2010 10:20168754
Sarah as a leader [78 words]KMSFeb 18, 2010 15:09168754
Obama needs to declare a fatwah on the ayatollah and on president whatsathedamaj?! [44 words]PeterFeb 10, 2010 03:41168749
Sarah Palin, would take, nuclear iran seriously ! , sadly President Obama does not SEEM to be doing this. ... '10 [149 words]Phil GreendFeb 10, 2010 01:07168745
Sarah Palin! Scary indeed [41 words]dhimmi no moreFeb 9, 2010 18:07168733
our dhimmi is sometimes right too, ha ? [25 words]endrit huFeb 15, 2010 20:49168733
1Another victim of Turkish imperialism [144 words]dhimmi no moreFeb 16, 2010 19:26168733
1Bomb Iran, pay the price? [150 words]Rebecca MouldsFeb 9, 2010 13:54168719
The US won the Super Bowl in 45! [51 words]albert palmerFeb 12, 2010 07:15168719
Asserting power [199 words]Rebecca MouldsFeb 12, 2010 09:49168719
A war the US would not win [130 words]Anonymous Kid Genius (Ha IM Only 14)Feb 13, 2010 10:07168719
Die Welt [24 words]AlexFeb 9, 2010 13:34168718
OK. Now I know it is a foolish idea. [46 words]LazmanFeb 9, 2010 12:32168713
Sarah Palin Endorses "bomb Iran." For the Future of this World, Iran needs to be Stopped. [250 words]DebbieFeb 9, 2010 10:44168707
War [69 words]Joe Six-PackFeb 9, 2010 12:56168707
War. There has been a complacency in the Obama administration. - Response to Joe Six Pack [140 words]DebbieFeb 11, 2010 16:49168707
To: Palin, Joe six pack and likes of dhimmi [126 words]Cristina BoleFeb 15, 2010 20:55168707
Complacency in the Obama administration. response to Christina Bole. [605 words]DebbieFeb 16, 2010 12:34168707
Would bombing a nuclear reactor be enough? [122 words]Peter HerzFeb 9, 2010 09:25168702
Widespread pusillanimity [35 words]Steve KleinFeb 9, 2010 08:49168699
That's what I'm afraid of [46 words]Anne-Marie DelcambreFeb 9, 2010 08:13168698
Out of Respect for Decency, I will not comment on the headline. [24 words]Tom SatterleeFeb 9, 2010 00:23168685
Sarah Palin also endorses bridge to nowhere and Billion dollar research on drosophelias !! [46 words]Lisa TahonikaFeb 9, 2010 00:18168684
Lisa Tahonika, if BO can run the country, any one can!! [78 words]BAFeb 9, 2010 22:54168684
Sarah Palin scares me to death- shouldn't be a good role-model for anyone ! [203 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Mike DukanovicFeb 9, 2010 00:08168683
Mr. Pipes: Couldn't you find a better example than this silly lady? [42 words]Sara MilesFeb 8, 2010 23:55168681
Sarah Palin [53 words]Norman MeyersonFeb 8, 2010 22:55168679
Akin to handing an atomic bomb to Hitler in the last days of World War II [126 words]markjuliansmithFeb 8, 2010 21:42168678
Sarah should learn to read [100 words]Mike ShapiroFeb 8, 2010 21:41168677
To You and Everyone Else: Grow Up! [129 words]AlexFeb 12, 2010 17:12168677
Sarah Palin? Bomb Iran ! [84 words]Nenette GrunbergFeb 8, 2010 19:04168669
Affording a third war now. [56 words]Nathan KravetzFeb 8, 2010 18:52168667
Sarah Of America [23 words]InfosifterFeb 8, 2010 18:41168665
Palin support for bombing Iran [132 words]Janusz KowalikFeb 8, 2010 18:39168664
Nuclear bombing of Iran? [14 words]Aad MolenkampFeb 20, 2010 18:14168664
Pat Buchanan [65 words]Ronald BelkinFeb 8, 2010 18:17168663
Notice the US & Israel flag lapel pin. [8 words]Maccabee613Feb 8, 2010 18:04168659
Absolutely Unglued [142 words]Sheldon TyberFeb 8, 2010 17:53168656
You and Sarah are NOT the first to want the U.S. to attack Iran [27 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Alec RawlsFeb 8, 2010 17:46168655
Having it both ways - but who will ultimately end up under the bus if she actually wins? [181 words]Cavan JohnFeb 8, 2010 17:42168654
wishful thinking [48 words]Isahiah62Feb 8, 2010 16:59168652
Obama is now aiming to get the Nobel Prize for Economics. [108 words]M.D.Feb 8, 2010 16:49168650
to M.D. - Nobel Prize in Chemistry not Economics [62 words]ASFeb 12, 2010 23:54168650
American male leaders take note [33 words]Tom F.Feb 8, 2010 16:47168649
1really? [194 words]dogagasMar 9, 2010 04:23168649
Our dear dogagas and what is really al-jihad [125 words]dhimmi no moreMar 10, 2010 06:28168649
offensive jihad [333 words]dogagasMar 10, 2010 09:21168649
our dear dogagas and the word al-jihad [569 words]dhimmi no moreMar 13, 2010 16:28168649
1i'll try this again [113 words]dogagasMar 14, 2010 18:58168649
our dear dogagas and the word al-jihad part deux [312 words]dhimmi no moreMar 15, 2010 18:29168649
31 years [17 words]Walter E. WallisFeb 8, 2010 16:24168648
You like Sarah Palin? [3 words]Pablo IkbaFeb 8, 2010 16:20168647
Sara Palin is just a show girl [8 words]Todd ParkerFeb 9, 2010 12:27168647
Let's hope more serious Republicans chime in supportively [60 words]Boston guyFeb 8, 2010 16:16168646
Put Iran on dock for "War Crimes" [275 words]L. N. ErnstFeb 8, 2010 16:14168645
Ah, yes. [34 words]Peter HerzFeb 23, 2010 18:25168645
Sarah Palin [57 words]Bob HansonFeb 8, 2010 16:05168644

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to 800,000 Hindus can't be wrong by the Grand Infidel of Kaffiristan

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

ADVERTISEMENTS

eXTReMe Tracker

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2019 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)