Hey STS - mercy and Muslims? It's an oxymoron

Submitted by Jaladhi (United States), Sep 12, 2008 at 14:58

Sts writes:"Oh, Yeah, as if I believe you.

You are the dellusioned person in here

Look at the records, to say 80 to 100 milion were killed by muslims. WHAT?, they had nuclear bombs or what.

of all the wars that muslims had in all history, the total casualties of those wars altogether do not count for what the christians did in WW I and WW II"

Hey STS your reply is as expected. Muslims never admit the truth about Islam and Muslims!!! Always deny, deny, deny,.... Well that does not convert lies into truths. Read the history books and you will find the truth about Islamic invasions of the world. For your information, Muslims did not lead a peace delegation to India and Europe where they inficted unprecedented holocaust and genocide on the native Hindus and Buddhists. Casualties in the modern world wars don't even amount to a fraction of killings done by Muslims from seventh century onwards.

Your comments show who is lying here - all the evidence points to you and not me.

You ask how could Muslims have killed 80 to 100 million Hindus and Buddhists since they did not have nuclear weapons . One does not need nuclear weapons to kill, a sword is sufficient to do the job - in case you did not know Muslims have always used swords to behead the infidels as ordered by allah, a practice faithfully followed even today by followers of your religion.

Read the Story of Civilization by Will Durant, or Essays by Arthur Schopenhauer, or History of India by Francoise Gautier, and you will get the true picture of atrocities by Muslims in India. Or read your own Islamic ibn Ishaq describing genocide of 800 innocent jews of Yathrib where Mo and Ali gleefully beheaded those innocent souls and then proceeded to rape women of the tribe on the same night they murdered their husbands and brothers. How civilized!!!

Let me paste some of the words of these historians about Muslim invasions of India:

Will Durant, the well-known American historian says in the book "The Story of Civilization: Our Oriental Heritage" page 459

"...the Islamic conquest of India is probably the bloodiest story in history. It is a discouraging tale, for its evident moral is that civilization is a precious good, whose delicate complex order and freedom can at any moment be overthrown by barbarians invading from without and multiplying from within." Almost all the Muslims of South Asia are descendants of weaker elements of the population who had succumbed to forcible Islamic conversion." )

"The Mohammedan conquest of India is probably the bloodiest story in history". The Islamic historians and scholars have recorded with great glee and pride of the slaughters of Hindus, forced conversions, abduction of Hindu women and children to slave markets and the destruction of temples carried out by the warriors of Islam during 800 AD to 1700 AD. Millions of Hindus were converted to Islam by sword during this period. "

(source: The Story of Civilization: Our Oriental Heritage - By Will Durant page 459).

Arthur Schopenhauer writes:

Francois Gautier in his book - Rewriting Indian History

"Let it be said right away: the massacres perpetrated by Muslims in India are unparalleled in history, bigger than the holocaust of the Jews by the Nazis; or the massacre of the Armenians by the Turks; more extensive even than the slaughter of the South American native populations by the invading Spanish and Portuguese."

Alain Danielou, son of French aristocracy, author of numerous books on philosophy, religion, history and arts of India, in his book, Histoire de l' Inde writes:

"From the time Muslims started arriving, around 632 AD, the history of India becomes a long, monotonous series of murders, massacres, spoliations, and destructions. It is, as usual, in the name of 'a holy war' of their faith, of their sole God, that the barbarians have destroyed civilizations, wiped out entire races." Mahmoud Ghazni, continues Danielou, "was an early example of Muslim ruthlessness, burning in 1018 of the temples of Mathura, razing Kanauj to the ground and destroying the famous temple of Somnath, sacred to all Hindus. His successors were as ruthless as Ghazni: 103 temples in the holy city of Benaras were razed to the ground, its marvelous temples destroyed, its magnificent palaces wrecked." Indeed, the Muslim policy vis a vis India, concludes Danielou, seems to have been a conscious systematic destruction of everything that was beautiful, holy, refined."

(source: Histoire de l' Inde - By Alain Danielou p. 222).

Danielou points out that the sack of the magnificent city of Vijayanagar, which was like an island of civilization, chivalry, and beauty, in the midst of a shattered and bleeding India, by Husain Nizam Shah, was an horror: "During nearly FIVE months," reminisces Danielou, " the Muslims set themselves to the task of destroying everything, the temples, the palaces, the magnificent residences. The scenes of terror and massacre were unparalleled and mightier than the imagination can ever fathom. The victors grabbed so much richness in gold, silver, jewels, precious furniture, camels, tents, girls, boys, slaves, weapons, armours, that there were not a single plain soldier who did not depart a rich man. And nothing remained after their departure of the most beautiful and prosperous city of that time, but smoking ruins."

"Nadir Shah, of Iran attacked Delhi in 1739 and for a week his soldiers massacred everybody, ransacked everything and razed the entire countryside, so that the survivors would have nothing to eat. He went back to Iran taking with him precious furniture, works of art, horses, the Kohinoor diamond, the famous Peacock throne and 150 million rupees in gold."

(source: Histoire de l' Inde - By Alain Danielou p. 251- 290).

And Andrew Bostom writes:

Jihad Against the Hindus & Their Condition in the Delhi Sultanate and Under the Mughals

"K.S. Lal analyzed Indian demography for the period between 1000-1525, from Mahmud of Ghazni, through the end of the Delhi Sultanate. This half millennium was an era of Islamic invasion and rule during which endless jihad campaigns were waged by Muslim leaders (see here, pp. 77-85; 433-461; 631-653)—including Qutbuddin Aibak, Alauddin Khalji, Muhammad and Firoz Tughlaq, and of course Amir Timur—all of whom were celebrated in Muslim chronicles as "killers of lakhs" (each lakh= 100,000) of Hindus. Lal estimates that the numbers of Hindus who perished as a result of these campaigns was approximately 80 million—which far exceeds the toll of internecine violence between Muslims for this, or any other historical period."

Andrew Bostom's book, The Legacy of Jihad, is a classic book documenting Muslim atrocities throughout the world!!!

Hey STS, read this book you might learn some truth about Islam, jihad and Muslims!!!

You also write: "wake up, you are dreaming, having nightmares - read history books and see what killing the viking hadmade in europe, see the atrocities of the Hindus and the chinese. See trhe crusaders what they did in Palestine, See the Jews what they did to the Palestinians..."

All these comments apply to Muslims so aptly, but as always you will deny the reality and truth about Islam!!! Genocide of jews of Yathrib was done by Mo and you won't even admit it!!!

You ask: "Are you for real,"

Now ask yourself if you are for real, denying all the atrocities and barbarism that Muslims inflicted on this world??

Looks like you in delusion as ever!!!

"...This of the fanaticism, the endless persecutions, the religious wars, that sanguinary frenzy of which the ancients had no conception! The destruction or disfigurement of the ancient temples and idols, a lamentable, mischievous and barbarous act still bears witness to the monotheistic fury...carried on from Mahmud, the Ghaznevid of cursed memory, down to Aurangzeb, the fratricide, whom the Portuguese...have zealously imitated by destruction of temples and the auto defe of the inquisition at Goa...We hear nothing of this kind in the case of the Hindoo...."

(source: The Essays of Arthur Schopenhauer - By T. Bailey Saunders p. 42-43).

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".