69 million page views


Reader comment on item: Rethinking the Egypt-Israel "Peace" Treaty

Submitted by Elliot (Canada), Nov 21, 2006 at 12:07

It is arguable that the treaty acted as window dressing to provide the Egyptian government with an excuse not to go to war in the face of popular sentiment to test Israel on the battlefield.

The comparison with Syria is used to offer a comparison with a country not being armed by the United States. However, Syria remained belligerent to the US, and I expect that were Egypt as belligerent, it would not be a candidate as US arms customer. If this is so, then it is pointless to argue that the treaty had a negative effect of attracting an Egyptian arms build up.

Your comments are welcome. Elliot


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)