69 million page views


Reader comment on item: Rethinking the Egypt-Israel "Peace" Treaty
in response to reader comment: for peace with this undeserving country, Israel returned the Sinai and its oil and its potenital?

Submitted by Godfrey deBouillon (United States), Jan 1, 2011 at 11:33

You're right, James. Land for peace has proven to be an abjectly miserable failure. Israel should still hold the Sinai (which was only attached to Egypt for British convenience anyway), Judea and Samaria and make it clear the Golan, too, is now and will remain part of Eretz Israel!


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)