David Smyth's imagined evidence

Submitted by An American-Israeli (Israel), Mar 19, 2003 at 06:37

David Smyth says that his job is to report facts. Yet all he
does is report the OPINIONS of certain high-ranking people,
without bringing forth any evidence (i.e. facts) to support these
opinions.

Perhaps he could have spared us all some grief if he
had asked his star witnesses, who were not present
at the time of the attack, whether they have anything
with which to back up their opinions. Until then, we must
conclude that Mr. Smyth has no evidence.

In the meantime, my suggestion to those who may have
been intimidated by the flood of anti-Cristol comments
(both here and on amazon.com) is to READ CRISTOL'S
BOOK, and then judge for themselves who is right.

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".