37 readers online now

Latest Articles

 

ADVERTISEMENTS



Premium Links
by Wikio

Computers
Electronics
Communication
Appliances

eXTReMe Tracker

Here's a good question..
Reader comment on article: Korean Delusions [of Appeasement]

Submitted by Erek Withee (United States), Oct 19, 2002 at 19:33

The Administration knew about the North Korean nuclear arms for 12 days before they released the information. Why did they wait? Answer: they were waiting for the vote on Iraq to get passed first. They knew that this knowledge would shift the dynamic of the vote in Congress. Because all the arguments used to justify striking Iraq now apply doubly so for North Korea. The debates in Congress would have been much more interesting if this information had been widely spread prior to the debate. I think the vote might not have even happened.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited, before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments.

Submit a comment on this article

Other reader comments on this article

Title By Date
What problems must be overcome?
[w/response] [42 words]
Ty SeldenMar 8, 2003 19:49
Problems with Reunification [77 words]BrianApr 2, 2007 12:33
Let South Korea Reunify [123 words]David PaulJan 17, 2003 13:39
Mr. Pipes actually learns from history [398 words]Doug DuncanJan 6, 2003 01:52
It's the Arabs appeasing the US [120 words]A disagreerOct 28, 2002 12:40
3 Quibbles [180 words]William KinneyOct 27, 2002 15:13
Reply to commenter Eric Withee [349 words]Sammy FinkelmanOct 23, 2002 14:51
Time will tell... [42 words]Jeff LermanOct 21, 2002 19:38
⇒ Here's a good question.. [94 words]Erek WitheeOct 19, 2002 19:33
Now with nukes! [60 words]Ben ShniperOct 18, 2002 16:25
Why are we still in South Korea? [141 words]Joe CunninghamOct 18, 2002 13:12
Yes, it did begin in 1979--I was there. [244 words]Gregory C. Colan, Esq.Oct 11, 2002 13:43
Don't forget the 800-lb. gorilla [346 words]jackstpaulOct 10, 2002 19:47
Key causes [65 words]Robert EinarssonOct 10, 2002 19:47
Removing the tripwire? [31 words]mccOct 10, 2002 13:09
Another Reason [76 words]Fred GlassOct 10, 2002 02:36
Sign of Maturity [221 words]Bob GreeneOct 10, 2002 01:40
Awakening? [97 words]Yale ZussmanOct 10, 2002 00:58
Thank You for Showing us the Big Picture [69 words]Rachel NeuwirthOct 9, 2002 17:47
We should fix Korea first.... [186 words]J. E. WitheeOct 9, 2002 17:34
People need hope [60 words]Mark FeldsteinOct 9, 2002 17:23
Playing into the left wing's hand [147 words]Harry JohnsonOct 9, 2002 14:49
A brewing disaster [29 words]Isaac BotbolOct 9, 2002 13:06
China's Role? [57 words]Peter WestreOct 9, 2002 11:33
Reunification at all costs? [297 words]Joshua TruaxOct 9, 2002 11:27
Timely Observation and Analogy [209 words]Ken HamiltonOct 9, 2002 11:03
Thoughts on Korea [219 words]M. SmithOct 9, 2002 10:38
Not often wrong, but wrong never the less. [349 words]Roy JacobsOct 9, 2002 10:36
NIce guys finish last, and often dead [43 words]"JB" in PGHOct 9, 2002 10:30
More dangerous than Iraq [27 words]Thomas JonesOct 9, 2002 09:58
American Civil War [53 words]Victor LipshutzOct 9, 2002 09:54
Western Delusions [52 words]Adam GreavesOct 9, 2002 08:34
We too [41 words]George ValdshteinOct 9, 2002 07:22
Good article [20 words]Steve NorthOct 9, 2002 06:09

Comment on Korean Delusions [of Appeasement]

Name
Email Address (optional)

Email me if someone replies to my comment
Title of Comments
Comments:

Mark my comment as a response to Here's a good question.. by reader Erek Withee

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited, before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments.

Click here to see the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

ADVERTISEMENTS

All materials written by Daniel Pipes on this site ©1979-2008 Daniel Pipes. Email: meqmef@aol.com