30 readers online now

Other Languages

Middle East Forum

About this site

Latest Articles

ADVERTISEMENTS

Premium Links
by Wikio

• Computers
• Electronics
• Communication
• Appliances

China's Role?
Reader comment on article: Korean Delusions [of Appeasement]

Submitted by Peter Westre (United States), Oct 9, 2002 at 11:33

A withdrawal/diminishment of American influence could also lead to an increase of China's political adventurism. Remember that N. Korea is a client state of the Chinese. This is a ball that rolls outside of the Korean peninsula (Think of the Phillipines, Japan, Taiwan, Indian subcontinent etc.)

Have the Chinese been linked with militant Islam and/or fomenting unrest?

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited, before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments.

Submit a comment on this article

Other reader comments on this article

Title	By	Date
What problems must be overcome? [w/response] [42 words]	Ty Selden	Mar 8, 2003 19:49
↔ Problems with Reunification [77 words]	Brian	Apr 2, 2007 12:33
Let South Korea Reunify [123 words]	David Paul	Jan 17, 2003 13:39
Mr. Pipes actually learns from history [398 words]	Doug Duncan	Jan 6, 2003 01:52
It's the Arabs appeasing the US [120 words]	A disagreer	Oct 28, 2002 12:40
3 Quibbles [180 words]	William Kinney	Oct 27, 2002 15:13
Reply to commenter Eric Withee [349 words]	Sammy Finkelman	Oct 23, 2002 14:51
Time will tell... [42 words]	Jeff Lerman	Oct 21, 2002 19:38
Here's a good question.. [94 words]	Erek Withee	Oct 19, 2002 19:33
Now with nukes! [60 words]	Ben Shniper	Oct 18, 2002 16:25
Why are we still in South Korea? [141 words]	Joe Cunningham	Oct 18, 2002 13:12
Yes, it did begin in 1979--I was there. [244 words]	Gregory C. Colan, Esq.	Oct 11, 2002 13:43
Don't forget the 800-lb. gorilla [346 words]	jackstpaul	Oct 10, 2002 19:47
Key causes [65 words]	Robert Einarsson	Oct 10, 2002 19:47
Removing the tripwire? [31 words]	mcc	Oct 10, 2002 13:09
Another Reason [76 words]	Fred Glass	Oct 10, 2002 02:36
Sign of Maturity [221 words]	Bob Greene	Oct 10, 2002 01:40
Awakening? [97 words]	Yale Zussman	Oct 10, 2002 00:58
Thank You for Showing us the Big Picture [69 words]	Rachel Neuwirth	Oct 9, 2002 17:47
We should fix Korea first.... [186 words]	J. E. Withee	Oct 9, 2002 17:34
People need hope [60 words]	Mark Feldstein	Oct 9, 2002 17:23
Playing into the left wing's hand [147 words]	Harry Johnson	Oct 9, 2002 14:49
A brewing disaster [29 words]	Isaac Botbol	Oct 9, 2002 13:06
⇒ China's Role? [57 words]	Peter Westre	Oct 9, 2002 11:33
Reunification at all costs? [297 words]	Joshua Truax	Oct 9, 2002 11:27
Timely Observation and Analogy [209 words]	Ken Hamilton	Oct 9, 2002 11:03
Thoughts on Korea [219 words]	M. Smith	Oct 9, 2002 10:38
Not often wrong, but wrong never the less. [349 words]	Roy Jacobs	Oct 9, 2002 10:36
NIce guys finish last, and often dead [43 words]	"JB" in PGH	Oct 9, 2002 10:30
More dangerous than Iraq [27 words]	Thomas Jones	Oct 9, 2002 09:58
American Civil War [53 words]	Victor Lipshutz	Oct 9, 2002 09:54
Western Delusions [52 words]	Adam Greaves	Oct 9, 2002 08:34
We too [41 words]	George Valdshtein	Oct 9, 2002 07:22
Good article [20 words]	Steve North	Oct 9, 2002 06:09

Comment on Korean Delusions [of Appeasement]

Name	Email Address (optional) Email me if someone replies to my comment
Title of Comments
Comments: Mark my comment as a response to China's Role? by reader Peter Westre
Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited, before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. Click here to see the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

ADVERTISEMENTS

All materials written by Daniel Pipes on this site ©1979-2008 Daniel Pipes. Email: meqmef@aol.com