1 readers online now  |  69 million page views

Speech on rights of individuals in Australia.

Reader comment on item: [The Canadian Islamic Congress:] An Islamist Apology

Submitted by Cheryl Salcole (Australia), Oct 19, 2005 at 02:21

This is a speech I wrote, thought it's relevant here.

"The Erosion of the Rights of Individuals in Australian Society"

Madame Chairman, ladies and gentlemen.
In our world of death, destruction, bombs and religious extremists – we hope that there is a utopia – a society of individuals functioning harmoniously. Many would say that this utopia is Australia – because it is assumed that in a democracy every person's rights are maintained, that all people are created equal by nature and should therefore be accorded equal treatment before the law. In a democracy – rights are those certain areas of human conduct which are immune from governmental interferences, such as the right to free speech. But our supposed utopian society is a facade. The rights of individuals in Australian society have been eroded to a stage where we can no longer rightly define ourselves as a democracy.

The History of Oppression is traceable through words such as 'wog', 'queer' and 'abbo'. A great sadness about the barriers that such ugly words create is that breeching the wall doesn't lead to freedom, but just to a different sort of oppression. At one time it was easy for us to desensitise ourselves to other groups of people by using names that condescended and mocked. The words that were used exposed these views and alienated and hurt many smaller groups in our society. This was when the majority dominated. Considering such minority group oppression their desire for a voice was understandable. In 1975, Al Grasby was the immigration minister and by exerting his influence, brought about the Anti-Discrimination Act. It was an attempt to counter oppression, further democracy, and establish equal rights for all individuals in Australian society. (But) the word 'Equality' now means that previously disadvantaged groups deserve more of a 'fair go' than the majority. One of the great crimes in our efforts to give everyone a fair go is the assumption that offensive name calling, for example, isn't painful unless you are part of a minority group. Anti-Discrimination laws are now counter-productive: rather than promoting harmony they foster resentment and have done (virtually) nothing but turn the tables. If political correctness has done anything it has armed the less powerful with a powerful weapon and how this weapon is now being used in Australian society is becoming an urgent issue.

Don't believe me? Then: Why was our Prime Minister's comment concerning Bin Laden called "inflammatory"? Why is a Melbourne Minister, who criticised Islam's attitude towards women, facing the prospect of jail? Why is anyone who questions this threat to democracy called a bigot, racist or xenophobe? They have power disproportionate to their numbers and superiority in the eyes of the law.

And as alarming as it is to say and think it – the majority of Australian people now have control over too little. Anti-discrimination laws are now detrimental to the democratic ideals upon which democracy was founded. (Democracy is based upon the notion of the greatest good for the greatest number.) The fear of being criticised, or worse still, the fear of being prosecuted has created a fractionalised community where the majority suffers. In this fractionalised community, numerous groups acting in isolation are bent upon promoting their own selfish unilateral aims and demands. Such groups are using multiple paths to achieve these ambitions. Question the rights of their arguments and one becomes subject to ridicule, abuse and increasingly answerable to some convenient law. The fundamental rights of free speech, the very rights of individuals in Australia have been eroded to a stage where there are few open forums of debate outside our parliaments.

So what can be done when the power does not lie with us? Indeed we feel even more powerless because we know staying silent does not work, hoping and doing nothing cannot work and asking for tolerance and acceptance has not and will not work.

The ideals of a utopian society fail under political correctness because some individuals are denied their basic rights. The moment our democracy ceases to respect the harmony and equality of a just society, it will cease to respect your value as an individual. The moment it ceases to respect your value as an individual it ceases to be democracy.

It is time. Australia must must recognise the growing threat and take action. "How?" you may ask. Well, we can follow Holland's example. They were losing their voice and hence shouted out to regain control. The Dutch Immigration Minister, who rejoices in the name of Rita Ver Donk, is called the "Iron Lady" because she has ordered immigrants to pass an exam in Dutchness. Holland has about 700,000 people who have been there for years, but who don't speak their language and haven't got a clue about Holland's basic rules and values. But its guaranteed that they'd know their rights. Mrs Ver Donk has argued publicly that her country has a right and duty to ask new immigrants to learn its language and to adapt to its Dutchness. Since July of this year, would-be newcomers over 17 have had to pass examinations requiring a basic knowledge of the language, history and culture of Holland. Australia must be more careful about who comes to this country and more demanding of what is expected of them when they get here.

Immigrants are just one example... of the groups that are manipulating the very policies and laws giving them their supposed fair share in Australia.
Since the Anti-discrimination laws were established, we've gone from one extreme to the other. A few years ago the characters Noddy and Big Ears were banned from television based on their alleged homosexuality (they were, of course, two men sleeping in the same bed). And yet these days a book advocating the superiority of homosexual parents above the typical mother and father union is being forced into social acceptance by the NSW government distributing it throughout state primary schools. Isn't it so deliciously ironic that we can have a white-board and not a blackboard (sorry, to be PC – its a chalkboard). You can no longer fall down a manhole, no-no-no, you have to fall down person holes. And for formal greetings at public addresses – it is now popular to say "chairperson" rather than the traditional "chairman" - which, by the way, has nothing to do with the MC being male or female.

For democracy to survive, every person must realise that mere insistence on his rights alone will be of little avail, that a recognition of one's obligations is imperative – and that one of the most important obligations is that of respecting the rights of others. It is impossible to have equality when there are barriers between groups. So perhaps by privileging Australia as an ideal society it is an attempt to break such walls down. The problem is we put up new restrictions denying some the right to free speech.

Ladies and Gentlemen, The trends in our society must not continue or we run the risk of forfeiting our national identity to the mercy of the powerful few. Running parallel to the traditions of the Australian way of life are the rights of individuals – the backbone of this country. The freedoms that democracy entitles may well be denied to future generations. We must draw upon our determination and "with courage let us all combine" to preserve democracy and the rights of individuals in Australian society. This is a conflict that must be fought, house by house, block by block - for our country, our freedom, our right to speak, debate and disagree.
Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (73) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
Dr. Pipes-You Get Your World Wide Information Straight [122 words]D.K. Milgrim-HeathMay 17, 2010 11:58172808
Be unrelenting and vigilant [107 words]Paul MorrisMar 7, 2008 18:22122014
Speech on rights of individuals in Australia. [1256 words]Cheryl SalcoleOct 19, 2005 02:2127087
War? [153 words]Ray BAug 23, 2005 07:4524984
More from the CIC -- Ban Certain Group from Government Appointments [1 words]Randall IsaacsAug 17, 2005 09:0524831
About apology [200 words]steven LAug 7, 2005 22:3724413
Response to Arlene [56 words]MarcJul 30, 2005 05:0624104
Thanks Naeem! [287 words]GWKJul 27, 2005 09:2023903
Response to A.A [46 words]Jacob CarmielJul 25, 2005 06:2923764
You're to be commended [144 words]Arlene BindonJul 25, 2005 00:1623762
In the Arena [255 words]Michael BakerJul 24, 2005 13:1423748
When will CAIR issue fatwa against mullahs who issued fatwah against Rushdie? [364 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Hari IyerJul 23, 2005 21:1523739
An Islamist Apology?? [40 words]rachelleJul 23, 2005 01:5423723
So which was it? [37 words]Eric KahnJul 22, 2005 17:1323704
Islamist apology [225 words]KamathJul 22, 2005 10:3723696
Jerry Samet's Not so absurd Idea [31 words]JaladhiJul 21, 2005 09:0623674
Response to Tarek Fateh [204 words]DvoraJul 21, 2005 07:0723673
Radical Islamists [122 words]Thomas A. MayerJul 20, 2005 21:3523667
On Tarek Fateh [157 words]Safdar AliJul 20, 2005 21:1723666
Welcome to humanity! [187 words]ArianaOct 22, 2008 06:3223666
Congratulations [44 words]john w. mcginleyJul 20, 2005 17:3923660
Canadian Islamic Congress apologizes to Daniel Pipes "without reservation" [226 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Tarek FatahJul 20, 2005 16:4823655
1Badly worded post on Muslim Chronicle [111 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Tarek FatahMay 18, 2008 08:4523655
apology-plus [81 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Jerry SametJul 20, 2005 14:0323651
Response to Naeem Din's post [158 words]ubangiJul 20, 2005 13:0323649
Suggestion to Naeem Din and other secularist Muslims [322 words]A.A.Jul 20, 2005 13:0223648
Congratulation [32 words]Germain Lucas, OttawaJul 20, 2005 12:4923647
Maybe we need to do this more often [46 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Peter J. HerzJul 20, 2005 12:3523645
Are muslims religious? [311 words]FrankJul 20, 2005 11:2123643
Spiritual Warfare [201 words]Danny BatesJul 20, 2005 11:0123642
Congratulations [13 words]S WeisbergJul 20, 2005 10:0423640
Email about an Islamist apology [48 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Naeem DinJul 20, 2005 09:4423639
Judeoscope welcomes the CIC's retraction [132 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
David OuelletteJul 20, 2005 08:0023635
Congratulations [32 words]Tulio AlbuquerqueJul 20, 2005 08:0023634
CIC [8 words]tonymixanJul 20, 2005 07:1423633
One down - thousands to go [73 words]George AdamowiczJul 20, 2005 04:0123632
Terrific! [4 words]Marvin RabinovitchJul 20, 2005 02:5523630
Hearing is not believing [18 words]Hari IyerJul 20, 2005 02:4123629
Islamist apology [64 words]Ben LesinJul 20, 2005 02:4023628
Look Who's Talkin' [17 words]Howard E. CookJul 20, 2005 02:0923627
It's About Time!! [268 words]Arlinda DeAngelisJul 19, 2005 22:3623625
have you seen the CIC website? [47 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
GordJul 19, 2005 22:3523624
Bravo! [46 words]Helen Rauch-ElnekaveJul 19, 2005 22:3323623
Defining Friend and Foe [328 words]Bill Reed IIIJul 19, 2005 22:2223622
Are Canadian libel laws different from US? [97 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Jeffrey A. SupowitJul 19, 2005 22:1923621
Taking care of the lawn [177 words]Boris FrenkelJul 19, 2005 22:0923620
Terror in every way of life [219 words]f. ShawkiJul 19, 2005 21:5223618
internment [74 words]Mark VanderJagtJul 19, 2005 21:1823616
1Muslims Apology [716 words]Edwina E. McCall Cpt ANJul 19, 2005 20:4223615
Islamist Apology [93 words]PhillipJul 19, 2005 20:1023614
A chink in the armor [32 words]Ed PoinsettJul 19, 2005 20:0323613
Keep Up the Good Fight [82 words]Ross HowardJul 19, 2005 19:5223611
Thank you! [68 words]mahasti tabibzaehJul 19, 2005 18:5123608
On step forward... [28 words]Duane HershbergerJul 19, 2005 18:1923606
Apology to an infidel? You are kidding [197 words]NazJul 19, 2005 18:1123605
An Islamist Apology [6 words]Cathy ShreveJul 19, 2005 17:5523604
Libel against Daniel Pipes from CIC [127 words]DvoraJul 19, 2005 17:4423602
Congrats & Question [354 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
J.Fred DeckerJul 19, 2005 17:1323600
apology [33 words]alan wintersJul 19, 2005 16:1123593
leading Islamist organization [210 words]Nissim AvrahamJul 19, 2005 16:0823592
Coming war with Iran [50 words]Mike WoolenJul 19, 2005 15:1823591
A temporary weakening. [32 words]Monty PogodaJul 19, 2005 15:1023589
Retraction retracted? [10 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Eric WeitzmanJul 19, 2005 15:0423588
What's in it for them? [86 words]Darwin BarrettJul 19, 2005 15:0423587
Islamists [167 words]Donald W. BalesJul 19, 2005 14:3023585
An Islamist Apology [40 words]david rothschildJul 19, 2005 14:1923584
AT WAR WITH AN ENEMY MORE THAN WILLING TO DIE [301 words]John GellesJul 19, 2005 14:1323583
Under Siege [88 words]Rob JamesJul 19, 2005 13:4523580
Mohamed Elmasry [34 words]LanceJul 19, 2005 13:1423578
Congratulations! [17 words]JaneJul 19, 2005 13:0423577
Congratulations on your Victory [57 words]JaladhiJul 19, 2005 12:5223576
islamist apology [63 words]ronan jubineauJul 19, 2005 12:4323574
Watch your back! [53 words]ubangiJul 19, 2005 12:4123573

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to Speech on rights of individuals in Australia. by Cheryl Salcole

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

ADVERTISEMENTS

eXTReMe Tracker

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2020 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)