41 readers online now

98,582 comments by 26,202 readers

Go to Mobile Site
Homepage Articles Blog Reviews Spoken Books Other Languages Biographical Middle East Forum About this site Mailing List

Latest Articles

 

ADVERTISEMENTS



Premium Links
by Wikio

• Computers
• Electronics
• Communication
• Appliances

eXTReMe Tracker

Look Who's Talkin'
Reader comment on item: [The Canadian Islamic Congress:] An Islamist Apology

Submitted by Howard E. Cook (United States), Jul 20, 2005 at 02:09

Can we believe in the sincerity of a retraction made out of fear of a libel suite?

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (72) on this item

Title By Date
Be unrelenting and vigilant [107 words]Paul MorrisMar 7, 2008 18:22
Speech on rights of individuals in Australia. [1256 words]Cheryl SalcoleOct 19, 2005 02:21
War? [153 words]Ray BAug 23, 2005 07:45
More from the CIC -- Ban Certain Group from Government Appointments [1 words]Randall IsaacsAug 17, 2005 09:05
About apology [200 words]steven LAug 7, 2005 22:37
Response to Arlene [56 words]MarcJul 30, 2005 05:06
Thanks Naeem! [287 words]GWKJul 27, 2005 09:20
Response to A.A [46 words]Jacob CarmielJul 25, 2005 06:29
You're to be commended [144 words]Arlene BindonJul 25, 2005 00:16
In the Arena [255 words]Michael BakerJul 24, 2005 13:14
When will CAIR issue fatwa against mullahs who issued fatwah against Rushdie?
[w/response] [364 words]		Hari IyerJul 23, 2005 21:15
An Islamist Apology?? [40 words]rachelleJul 23, 2005 01:54
So which was it? [37 words]Eric KahnJul 22, 2005 17:13
Islamist apology [225 words]KamathJul 22, 2005 10:37
Jerry Samet's Not so absurd Idea [31 words]JaladhiJul 21, 2005 09:06
Response to Tarek Fateh [204 words]DvoraJul 21, 2005 07:07
Radical Islamists [122 words]Thomas A. MayerJul 20, 2005 21:35
On Tarek Fateh [157 words]Safdar AliJul 20, 2005 21:17
↔ Welcome to humanity! [187 words]ArianaOct 22, 2008 06:32
Congratulations [44 words]john w. mcginleyJul 20, 2005 17:39
Canadian Islamic Congress apologizes to Daniel Pipes "without reservation"
[w/response] [226 words]		Tarek FatahJul 20, 2005 16:48
↔ Badly worded post on Muslim Chronicle
[w/response] [111 words]		Tarek FatahMay 18, 2008 08:45
apology-plus
[w/response] [81 words]		Jerry SametJul 20, 2005 14:03
Response to Naeem Din's post [158 words]ubangiJul 20, 2005 13:03
Suggestion to Naeem Din and other secularist Muslims [322 words]A.A.Jul 20, 2005 13:02
Congratulation [32 words]Germain Lucas, OttawaJul 20, 2005 12:49
Maybe we need to do this more often
[w/response] [46 words]		Peter J. HerzJul 20, 2005 12:35
Are muslims religious? [311 words]FrankJul 20, 2005 11:21
Spiritual Warfare [201 words]Danny BatesJul 20, 2005 11:01
Congratulations [13 words]S WeisbergJul 20, 2005 10:04
Email about an Islamist apology
[w/response] [48 words]		Naeem DinJul 20, 2005 09:44
Judeoscope welcomes the CIC's retraction
[w/response] [132 words]		David OuelletteJul 20, 2005 08:00
Congratulations [32 words]Tulio AlbuquerqueJul 20, 2005 08:00
CIC [8 words]tonymixanJul 20, 2005 07:14
One down - thousands to go [73 words]George AdamowiczJul 20, 2005 04:01
Terrific! [4 words]Marvin RabinovitchJul 20, 2005 02:55
Hearing is not believing [18 words]Hari IyerJul 20, 2005 02:41
Islamist apology [64 words]Ben LesinJul 20, 2005 02:40
⇒ Look Who's Talkin' [17 words]Howard E. CookJul 20, 2005 02:09
It's About Time!! [268 words]Arlinda DeAngelisJul 19, 2005 22:36
have you seen the CIC website?
[w/response] [47 words]		GordJul 19, 2005 22:35
Bravo! [46 words]Helen Rauch-ElnekaveJul 19, 2005 22:33
Defining Friend and Foe [328 words]Bill Reed IIIJul 19, 2005 22:22
Are Canadian libel laws different from US?
[w/response] [97 words]		Jeffrey A. SupowitJul 19, 2005 22:19
Taking care of the lawn [177 words]Boris FrenkelJul 19, 2005 22:09
Terror in every way of life [219 words]f. ShawkiJul 19, 2005 21:52
internment [74 words]Mark VanderJagtJul 19, 2005 21:18
Muslims Apology [716 words]Edwina E. McCall Cpt ANJul 19, 2005 20:42
Islamist Apology [93 words]PhillipJul 19, 2005 20:10
A chink in the armor [32 words]Ed PoinsettJul 19, 2005 20:03
Keep Up the Good Fight [82 words]Ross HowardJul 19, 2005 19:52
Thank you! [68 words]mahasti tabibzaehJul 19, 2005 18:51
On step forward... [28 words]Duane HershbergerJul 19, 2005 18:19
Apology to an infidel? You are kidding [197 words]NazJul 19, 2005 18:11
An Islamist Apology [6 words]Cathy ShreveJul 19, 2005 17:55
Libel against Daniel Pipes from CIC [127 words]DvoraJul 19, 2005 17:44
Congrats & Question
[w/response] [354 words]		J.Fred DeckerJul 19, 2005 17:13
apology [33 words]alan wintersJul 19, 2005 16:11
leading Islamist organization [210 words]Nissim AvrahamJul 19, 2005 16:08
Coming war with Iran [50 words]Mike WoolenJul 19, 2005 15:18
A temporary weakening. [32 words]Monty PogodaJul 19, 2005 15:10
Retraction retracted?
[w/response] [10 words]		Eric WeitzmanJul 19, 2005 15:04
What's in it for them? [86 words]Darwin BarrettJul 19, 2005 15:04
Islamists [167 words]Donald W. BalesJul 19, 2005 14:30
An Islamist Apology [40 words]david rothschildJul 19, 2005 14:19
AT WAR WITH AN ENEMY MORE THAN WILLING TO DIE [301 words]John GellesJul 19, 2005 14:13
Under Siege [88 words]Rob JamesJul 19, 2005 13:45
Mohamed Elmasry [34 words]LanceJul 19, 2005 13:14
Congratulations! [17 words]JaneJul 19, 2005 13:04
Congratulations on your Victory [57 words]JaladhiJul 19, 2005 12:52
islamist apology [63 words]ronan jubineauJul 19, 2005 12:43
Watch your back! [53 words]ubangiJul 19, 2005 12:41

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

ADVERTISEMENTS

All materials written by Daniel Pipes on this site © Daniel Pipes. Email: meqmef@aol.com