Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

So What Should We De Doing Now?
Reader comment on item: [London Terrorism:] British "Covenant of Security" with Islamists Ends

Submitted by Dan Rusen (Canada), Jul 8, 2005 at 14:23

Dear Dr. Pipes,

For many months now we have been reading your articles chronicling the events of the Islamic revolution. Indeed you are to be complimented for your clear ideas and information. But this is where you stop short. Knowing what our enemies are thinking and what they are planning is no longer very interesting .....because it is useless unless it forms the basis of further action to block these horrific plans.

I have been wondering at least since 9/11 if any plan other than colour - coded warnings and baggage searches will be implemented by governments to thwart these Islamic monsters in the so-called "war" on terrorism. If the US was really serious there is a lot more that could be done in a proactive realistic way to put an end to them. The last time the US and Canada got serious about dealing with national enemies was during WWII when members of the German Bund were often incarcerated, not to mention the wholesale marginalization and imprisonment of all Japanese - lest a fifth column be allowed to operate within and against our countries.

In Canada (October, 1970) the War Measures Act was invoked against a terrorist cell in Quebec. Similar actions must be taken here and in the rest of the western world which basically ignores activity that promises soon to be much worse by modern Islamic fiends. The Saudis, for example, have clearly been implicated in all sorts of hostile activity, yet because we like oil we appease and ignore them.

It is surely time the west got serious about rooting up and destroying these organizations, especially within our own borders. Appeasement and excuses lead always to destruction. The US has already been labelled "The Great Satan", while we have yet clearly to identify or characterize our enemies. Let us no longer stay The Great Accommodating Satan.

In short, it's time to do something serious....and we must look to people like you to suggest ways to begin.


Sincerely
Dan Rusen

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (79) on this item

Title By Date
ISLAM HAS TAKEN ANOTHER BELIEVE INTO A CULT AND DEVOTION TO BLOODSHED-ENTERTAINMENT. ref: atlas shrugs Indonesia. [418 words]Listiani LestariSep 21, 2009 08:00
Respose [171 words]yahya jamesonAug 4, 2005 12:14
response to "yahya" [239 words]Jeffrey HApr 22, 2006 20:46
To Ibrahim: Wake up - Islamofacists are involved [202 words]MaggieJul 31, 2005 04:22
Wake up, England! [470 words]FreethinkerAug 29, 2006 22:39
civil war [30 words]threefinkersSep 28, 2006 10:52
resist, do it for non-Muslim women [151 words]JuneJul 1, 2008 19:49
none [74 words]Ghani AsifSep 17, 2008 12:30
How can England submitt to Islam!? [75 words]MArkDec 16, 2008 11:24
To Ruquia Mohammed [601 words]MaggieJul 31, 2005 03:14
ur wrong [34 words]goharMay 28, 2006 16:22
Reply to Jacob: Who were these attackers? [236 words]MaggieJul 30, 2005 22:13
The forgotten victims [260 words]MaggieJul 30, 2005 21:51
An Islamist Apology [103 words]Karam Chand RamrakhaJul 25, 2005 01:51
British double standards [164 words]Adam KleinJul 20, 2005 09:24
Suicide Suckers [44 words]Brian HJul 17, 2005 19:27
Understanding Islam [66 words]John HurstJul 15, 2005 12:00
London Bombing
[w/response] [158 words]
Daniel RudderJul 14, 2005 12:04
Contextualizing 7/7 [247 words]Jonathan RickJul 13, 2005 19:21
covenant of security [40 words]michael c londonJul 13, 2005 14:29
Victims that you seem to have forgotten [37 words]dinakarJul 11, 2005 10:36
Another wake up call to the west [144 words]DanJul 11, 2005 10:30
Cynicism [20 words]Rabbi Joel ChazinJul 11, 2005 09:17
Covenant of security [103 words]Ramsis AlmasryJul 11, 2005 06:55
Islam good or bad [96 words]Bill PackardJul 10, 2005 23:54
complaint [63 words]John briceAug 29, 2009 15:59
How to control these terrors [364 words]f. shawkiJul 10, 2005 22:33
British'covenant of security" [90 words]Abraham BirenbaumJul 10, 2005 13:13
Britain and Israel- Bed Partners? [116 words]Carol FineblumJul 10, 2005 12:28
Public International Trial to Those Who Encourage Teror [101 words]Prof. Shalva TzivionSep 15, 2007 04:41
Very well said Dr Pipes - as always! [240 words]Dr Joseph BergerJul 10, 2005 10:33
uk [88 words]janellJul 10, 2005 10:23
Bombings & Mideast conflict [68 words]GabrielJul 10, 2005 09:59
European appeasement of terrorism [31 words]EhudJul 10, 2005 04:04
Response to Terror [274 words]SoliJul 10, 2005 03:48
This was inevitable [78 words]Arvind MadhavanJul 10, 2005 03:18
Comments by Mr. Bush and Mr. Blair [244 words]Michael RucksJul 10, 2005 02:12
A bit of irony [105 words]Hari IyerJul 10, 2005 01:42
British weakness [214 words]CraigJul 9, 2005 22:46
Covenant of Security is Baloney [83 words]MikeJul 9, 2005 21:55
Where in Heaven is Winston? [21 words]tomJul 9, 2005 21:08
what i think [28 words]ibrahimJul 9, 2005 18:16
Lets Clear A Few Things Up First....... [146 words]Jacob CarmielJul 9, 2005 16:26
British History of Protection? [195 words]John Randall PeacherJul 9, 2005 16:23
Identifying the enemy [93 words]J SchamrothJul 9, 2005 15:42
Lets stop dignifying gaggles of rowdies as "terrorists". [805 words]Tom MartinJul 9, 2005 12:51
what will Britain do? [35 words]joeyJul 9, 2005 12:10
Criminals have no Religion [56 words]Dildar AhmedJul 9, 2005 03:25
Islamic Machiavellianism [53 words]Timothy B. RobertsJul 8, 2005 23:45
Take comfort [98 words]D WolfJul 8, 2005 23:04
Muslim "Covenant of Security" [130 words]DvoraJul 8, 2005 21:57
Even If Children Die [138 words]Arlinda DeAngelisJul 8, 2005 19:10
BETRAYAL [15 words]HARRRY STILLMANJul 8, 2005 18:50
Islam Threatens Muslims Who Do Not Partake of "Jihad" [245 words]Mike RamirezJul 8, 2005 18:25
God [170 words]PanosFeb 14, 2006 15:09
A worried Somali, Danish, American Muslim [273 words]Ruqia MohamedJul 8, 2005 18:05
Rediculous Trust [242 words]Donald Grant CheesmanJul 8, 2005 16:26
Hostility by default? [138 words]BorisJul 8, 2005 16:25
SECURTY COVENANT IS ONLY A SHORT TIME OUT [80 words]batya daganJul 8, 2005 15:05
Great Truth open to the willingly blind. [131 words]Chaplain Gay L. Iverson Sr.Jul 8, 2005 14:44
Waiting for the other shoe to drop.... [586 words]yonasonJul 8, 2005 14:24
⇒ So What Should We De Doing Now? [328 words]Dan RusenJul 8, 2005 14:23
the "british muslim" [303 words]john grahamJul 8, 2005 13:53
London's slaughter is a wake up call [192 words]Michael KurtzigJul 8, 2005 13:47
Islam and economics [133 words]Panos TFeb 14, 2006 14:04
yes to this hope [36 words]bunuelJul 8, 2005 13:44
Blair & G 8 Leaders Still Deluded & Appeasing to Jihadists Who "ONLY" Strike Jews [175 words]Adina KutnickiJul 8, 2005 13:32
Unsure of how to react to this article [442 words]Kevin MorrowJul 8, 2005 13:31
Deceiving the Infidels [169 words]Darwin BarrettJul 8, 2005 13:30
You are going to hate me for this [585 words]Octavio JohansonJul 8, 2005 12:50
Will they wake-up? [158 words]No dhimmiJul 8, 2005 12:00
Covenant is selectively applied. [120 words]PatJul 8, 2005 11:37
No safe haven [15 words]Howard VeitJul 8, 2005 11:36
The Pacifist Problem [30 words]LanceJul 8, 2005 10:58
Stiff upper lip or stiff-necked? [251 words]Rob JamesJul 8, 2005 10:46
What will the British do now? [53 words]Sam DeakinsJul 8, 2005 10:40
they can do whatever they want as long as its NIMBY [144 words]RobJul 8, 2005 10:09
Muslims in the U.K. [212 words]DJul 8, 2005 10:06
what is really going on in iran and iraq [112 words]muhamad rizviAug 29, 2009 16:24

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page