2 readers online now  |  69 million page views

So let's ban black Nazi uniforms but not the grey ones!

Reader comment on item: Ban the Burqa, Allow the Burkini

Submitted by UNCLE VLADDI (Canada), Aug 23, 2016 at 19:37

The burka is a visible part of the islamic threat because it declares allegiance and Submission to islam. Ditto for the burkini.

Banning the one but not the other is as pointless as banning only some parts of Nazi uniforms and their accoutrements but not the swastika itself, for instance.

Islam teaches irresponsibility. It's nothing more than a list of victim-blaming excuses for its members' own criminal desires and actions. In this way it is exactly like the teachings of its Western libertine "liberal" counterparts.

Criminals in general insist there are no real crimes nor criminals, because we're all only ever helpless victims anyway - of predestined, "inevitable" circumstances beyond our control / victims of "society" / mere "products" of our environments (or, as their god, Karl Marx put it, of "historical predeterminism") and as their holy mobster "muslim" brethren prefer to proudly put it, "slaves of unknown and unknowable allah!"

Literal "Psycho-paths" (Greek for "Thought-Killers") fear fear (the thought of the mere memory of previous pains) AS more pain, and so hate thinking in both them selves and in all others. They also hate music and sex, because it induces a loss of control. Thus while Muhammad had to show his sexual strength, he also had to bow to others' complaints about seeing his wives going potty at night.

From Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 4, Number 148:

Narrated 'Aisha:

The wives of the Prophet used to go to Al-Manasi, a vast open place (near Baqia at Medina) to answer the call of nature at night. 'Umar used to say to the Prophet "Let your wives be veiled," but
Allah's Apostle did not do so. One night Sauda bint Zam'a the wife of the Prophet went out at 'Isha' time and she was a tall lady. 'Umar addressed her and said, "I have recognized you, O Sauda." He said so, as he desired eagerly that the verses of Al-Hijab (the observing of veils by the Muslim women) may be revealed. So Allah revealed the verses of "Al-Hijab" (A complete body cover excluding the eyes)....!

While any other self-respecting warlord would have had the peeping toms executed for spying on his wives at night, Muhammad agreed with Umar the peeper that they should have to cover up at all times, lest they induce lust in "unsuspecting" muslims, and that's how the whole burka/hijab notion arose, described in Sura 33:59.

The hijab doesn't express cultural diversity, so enabling it isn't an expression of inclusive tolerance. There's nothing in islam about it concerning any false "modesty" before god!

Libertine "liberal" criminals never investigate what they support in public, because their motive is always biased slander anyway: they are victim-blaming slanderous masochists, always trying to prevent other people's presumed racism before it starts. Committing crimes - "pre-emptively defensive" attacks - in advance of others' presumed attacks, is what these fraudulent virtue-signalling hypocrite criminals are all about.

The Hijab, (or Niqab, or burka) is not a religious duty or fashion trend, it's only a prison uniform!

It's also required by sura 24:31.

It's also a victim-blaming insult to both sexes; from Qur'an Sura 33:59, it is a slanderous statement that implies the muslim men (and all men, just like Muhammad himself allegedly was) are so at the mercy of their hormones, that they must molest and rape any and all women they can see; so it's always the women's own fault for not covering up.

It also says the muslim men have a duty to molest and rape all the infidel women for not covering up!

"O Prophet! Tell your wives and daughters and the believing women to draw their cloaks over their bodies. That will be better so that they will be known so as not to be molested. And Allâh is Most Forgiving, Most Merciful." (Qur'ân 33:59)

So, exactly HOW will they "be known," in the freedom sack?!

Certainly not as in: "Oh, I know her! Hi, Mary!" – but "known" as muslimas – as members of the gang!

And why is this important? "So as not to be molested!"

...

That it's the infidel women's faults, because they don't cover up, that the muslim men "must" molest (rape) them!

And the Qur'an itself confirms their holy right and duty to rape infidel women.

...

;-(

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to So let's ban black Nazi uniforms but not the grey ones! by UNCLE VLADDI

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List
eXTReMe Tracker

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2020 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)