tough choice

Submitted by John W McGinley (United States), Sep 21, 2004 at 22:56

As per your article, I am more concerned with mega-terrorism than with the possibility/reality that innocent people will be detained and spend some time in jail. They say that a "dirty bomb" in NYC could conceivably kill up to a million people in a very short period of time; maim many more others for the rest of their lives, and cause generational problems of varying magnitudes for millions more. so, all in all, it's a fair trade off.

However, I don't understand why those two Indian Muslims had to be detained for so long. It might takes weeks to clear someone of suspicion. Why would it take months, even a year? That's wrong. Yet again, sometimes where there is smoke, there's fire. Maybe there was not enough evidence to bring an indictment, but there may well have been reason to remain suspicious. I don't know.

I do know that I would rather err on the side of safety for millions even if such involves an infringment on the civil rights of others, and if I had to have my civil rights infringed upon, I would rather have them infringed upon in the USA than in almost any other country in the world. Infringing on rights is not the same as abrogating rights.

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".