Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

The Truth about AI
Reader comment on item: To Profile or Not to Profile?

Submitted by Peter J. Herz (Taiwan), Sep 21, 2004 at 20:10

Indeed, a poor man's dirty bomb detonated on Manhattan is a lot worse than a handful of innocents briefly detained, then released for lack of evidence. I myself have reached the conclusion that groups like Amnesty International and the American Civil Liberties Union have indeed, in the words of a former Supreme Court justice, turned the Bill of Rights into a suicide pact.

Our human rights organizations are the fruit of a Western world that had spawned a non-coercive Christianity giving its blessing to the political ideals of rule of law and consent of the governed. Outside of its prisons, the Western world had also done away with the time-honored practices of slavery and killing prisoners for minor crimes or even as a form of cheap, public entertainment. More importantly, AI and ACLU were born in a world dominated by a concert of states steeped in the above ideals. Certainly the colonialist West was overbearing and arrogant in the "civilizing mission" it sought to spread across an unwilling and bewildered non-Western world; certainly the West, at times, failed in humane race relations in the New World and in practicing a compassionate use of wealth. Yet the West's "civilizing mission" allowed the concepts of liberty and a law other than the capricious whim of a human sovereign to spread; and inculcated ideals of justice that the rest of the world uses to indict it.

The tactic that the West's enemies have adopted to fight it is that of the "People's War"--which is simply a reversion to the old Hurons vs. Iroquois way of warfare in which everyone's fair game whether armed or not, and the losers are literally lunch (or at least slaves who may be killed at the master's whim). Frankly, if there are whole peoples who will immolate themselves and their minor children to destroy our balance of law and liberty, extending to them the protections of our human rights regime is a recipe for civilizational suicide.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (47) on this item

Title By Date
I wish it would stop/The chickens will come home to roost. [262 words]Wali A. RazzaqDec 14, 2006 21:54
racism? [66 words]Rick DonaldsonAug 24, 2006 12:15
Racial Profiling is Racism in action. EOM [6 words]Bryan AlawiDec 19, 2005 08:04
Because it's Them not You [275 words]TimDec 15, 2004 14:04
Read one's history [92 words]SubrataOct 4, 2004 11:35
Is Racial Profiling Enough? [82 words]Ian G.Oct 3, 2004 23:08
Yes to profiling. [266 words]RPSep 28, 2004 02:15
what about America's homegrown terrorists? [97 words]BGApr 18, 2009 12:19
Righteous Indignation [51 words]Ron MSep 28, 2004 01:14
Dont go too far [214 words]johnSep 26, 2004 17:38
Profiling is a constitutional defense of freedom [40 words]Alvin SamuelsSep 26, 2004 03:40
Profiling is bad? [129 words]Adam LubinSep 23, 2004 21:16
Wake up. Protect ourselves. [31 words]Preston PhillipsSep 23, 2004 02:15
Mind Readers? I think not [62 words]David LincolnSep 22, 2004 23:13
Racial Profiling [67 words]Jeff MartinSep 22, 2004 22:31
Necessity of Profiling [6 words]Norris HaseltonSep 22, 2004 19:04
We're stupid if we DON'T profile [1179 words]lukeSep 22, 2004 17:02
Spot On [88 words]LouFeb 11, 2009 19:02
Terrorists among us [87 words]Kim SegarSep 22, 2004 13:04
Err on the side of safety [90 words]James Van ValkenburgSep 22, 2004 09:25
Politically incorrect [24 words]Alvin ShamesSep 22, 2004 09:21
Phony human rights [91 words]S.C.PandaSep 22, 2004 05:49
Profiling [214 words]Michael BurkertSep 22, 2004 02:26
Amnesty International [45 words]Jaleh AzadSep 22, 2004 01:14
More profiling please [22 words]Tom PensylSep 22, 2004 00:46
How right you are [34 words]Ivan MicklinSep 22, 2004 00:28
Counter Terrorism and Profiling [231 words]Harold DodsonSep 21, 2004 23:14
Absolutely spot-on [32 words]Jeff MagnusonSep 21, 2004 23:13
tough choice [212 words]John W McGinleySep 21, 2004 22:56
Tough problems call for tough answers [22 words]WalterSep 21, 2004 22:18
Life Precedes Rights [88 words]T. B. RobertsSep 21, 2004 21:44
To Profile or Not to Profile [195 words]Arlinda DeAngelisSep 21, 2004 20:41
⇒ The Truth about AI [326 words]Peter J. HerzSep 21, 2004 20:10
Approval of your arguments. [280 words]Jim WrightSep 21, 2004 17:05
Which has priority in war--civil rights or citizens' safety? [60 words]Anne WhiteSep 21, 2004 14:50
Profiling an absolute necessity [95 words]C. CannonSep 21, 2004 13:26
Profiling [110 words]Susan KriegerSep 21, 2004 12:52
Outrage about profiling! [87 words]Shirley PylantSep 21, 2004 12:25
When Profiling is Justified [105 words]Robert SmithSep 21, 2004 12:10
I agree! [29 words]NinaSep 21, 2004 11:47
Shame on Amnesty International & USA [100 words]JALEH AZADSep 21, 2004 11:30
A balance [156 words]John H. RubelSep 21, 2004 11:09
Profiling Muslims [60 words]Alan SkorskiSep 21, 2004 10:51
Muslim Profiling [79 words]PARAug 16, 2006 20:35
Profiling is correct [174 words]Rabindra BhattacharjeeAug 25, 2006 01:55
Profiling muslims should be a law, not a debate [51 words]paulJun 21, 2007 00:15
change shoes [43 words]abby n.Dec 5, 2007 22:54

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page