1 readers online now  |  69 million page views

could have been much worse

Reader comment on item: Why I Stand with Geert Wilders
in response to reader comment: "Colonialism has been a fact of life" true?

Submitted by the Grand Infidel of Kafiristan (Australia), Jan 26, 2010 at 17:38

Myth writes:

"Grand Infidel, let me support Mr.Soetero.......Mr.Soetero has every right to protest colonialism, I also do not want to be colonized."

Of course he has every right to protest. And neither did the native population of North Africa by marauding Islamists from Arabia.The point is though - colonialism is an historical fact. He is lamenting something that occurred over 300 years ago and therefore crying over spilt milk.

" .....Not by better technology,...."

again - just historical fact and a process which you can do little about. The same applied 30,000 years ago when Neanderthals met homo sapiens with spearthrowing implements, when under equipped tribes met the might of the Roman army, the Incas bows and arrows against the muskets of the Spanish.

"....not by english language in business, "

I sympathise - but again - very little can be done about it. Then again - it is good to have standards. When you think about it - having a common internal language is what allows all computers on the Net to communicate. Whether they have Mac or Windows or any other OS - they communicate between each other with a common set of protocols. No subtle nuances to be misunderstood. No delays etc.

"...not by international corporations, "

yes - a definite evil - but have we all stopped buying their products?

".......not by muslim mass immigration."
but that we can do something about - and presents a more clear and present danger than the other points you have mentioned. Plenty of people see the parallels with early Nazism.

"Mr.Soetero has every right to stay whatever he is being an indonesian."
True - and I have every right to say what I do - and to realise that being Indonesian and Muslim, Mr.Soetero has a particular barrow to push

"As for the dutch, the Netherlands together with northern Italy was way ahead of anybody else in Europe around 1600."
Yes - at that time and since the Dutch have been one of the worlds trading superpowers.

" I seriously doubt that Indonesia came in any way close because of the dutch. "
I am not sure what you mean here - close to what? My contention is that given what is now Indonesia with its many natural resources was wide open to conquest 400 years ago - the 'Indonesians' of that time would have been a whole lot worse off had they been colonised by anyone other than the Dutch.

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to could have been much worse by the Grand Infidel of Kafiristan

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List
eXTReMe Tracker

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2020 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)