Yoram Schweitzer has now responded twice to me, and I think it about time to close down his and my exchange, but not before one final, brief reply on my part.
Schweitzer has quietly but completely retracted his initial criticism of me. On July 24, he dismissed my views as "patronizing and insulting, overlooking as they do the fact that the government and public have the right to decide for themselves …, and to shoulder the resulting price," then for good measure castigating me for doing so from my "secure haven thousands of miles away." Today, it's all sweetness and light:
The right to voice one's thoughts, irrespective of the degree of one's first-hand knowledge of the issues in question, is a linchpin of academic, and indeed democratic, discourse and is not in dispute. The problem with Pipes' last two offerings doesn't lie with the fact that he isn't an Israeli citizen.
Well, thank you. But then, Schweitzer continues: "Rather, it is that he reduces a complex issue to a sound byte, completely ignores the context of the matter at hand and harshly attacks Israeli officials for their handling of this latest crisis."
Sound byte? Well, first the proper expression is "sound bite." Second, it refers to "A short and easily remembered line, intended by the speaker to be suitable for media repetition." My article on the Israel-Hizbullah exchange may be wrong, but it is certainly not a sound bite. It's even less a sound bite when one notes how it fits into my history of writing against disproportionate Israeli exchanges going back over two decades, including "Kuwait's Terrorism Policy Sets an Example" (1986) and "Hezbollah's Victory, Israel's Decline" (2004). (August 3, 2008)