69 million page views

Ken, are you sure about Yoram Schweitzer?

Reader comment on item: A Final Reply to Yoram Schweitzer
in response to reader comment: How can Yoram Schweitzer, someone so shallow, hold such an important position?

Submitted by Ynnatchkah (United States), Aug 9, 2008 at 21:07

Yoram advised in such a bad manner (the way you exposed) the Israeli govn't?

His reports, AFA I read, look very specific and precise.

Go to Yoram Web Site (Labat).

I truly think Yoram criticized Dr. Pipes to get the attention of the public towards the existence of his consulting company, in order to improve profits.

True he may not be bright enough but in a matter of studying patterns, he looks somehow competent.

The way he retreated from his initial position against foreigners' comments on Israel's policy, the timeframe of the retreat, along with the new argument he exposes towards getting again Dr. Pipes Feed Back, shows me a (supposed) pattern of wanting to be consistently cited by danielpipes.org, a very well known Web Site- according also to Google's source.

To me smells and sounds as Propaganda for free.

He is NOT against Dr. Pipes or Dr. Pipes line, meaning that he is not a CAIR's style creature or a leftist...He is pro Israel in his essence.....

Instead of writing privately to Dr. Pipes expressing his concerns, he does that publicly and with a lot of fingers and fragility...

This is so true that again, his retrieval from the starting position upon which he built his main argument at first, vanished on a heartbeat, technically speaking.

Yet, important to remind that if such a un-prepared guy protects Israel, we are in a bad shape, of course.

Thanks the Universe, Dr. Pipes already wrote his answer, under the title of a Final Reply so no more propaganda for Yoram is to be made.

As it says in my land:

"...Please, speak out about me...even tough it is a bad commentary, b/c it is better to be commented about badly, than not having commentaries about " me" at all"...

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (17) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
Israel downhill slide [100 words]Gregory SmithSep 15, 2008 11:29138623
Who is Schweizer? [77 words]AzrielAug 19, 2008 12:53137015
To Daniel Pipes and Yoram Schweitzer [122 words]huckAug 6, 2008 07:56136351
Disagree with you Huck [165 words]YnnatchkahAug 9, 2008 14:53136351
Ynnatchkah, agree and disagree with you [138 words]huckAug 13, 2008 06:02136351
2Thanks Huck- Deeply Appreciated. [29 words]YnnatchkahAug 13, 2008 14:50136351
Third Perspective in Yoram's Case. [274 words]YnnatchkahAug 15, 2008 00:36136351
Interesting thoughts Ynnatchkah [115 words]huckAug 15, 2008 23:14136351
I liked a lot your commentary, especially the following part: [344 words]YnnatchkahAug 16, 2008 20:02136351
Sound bite not so bad [56 words]Archimedes2Aug 6, 2008 01:03136335
Yes. The Sound Byte [47 words]YnnatchkahAug 9, 2008 14:43136335
good job Daniel Pipes [104 words]Yuval BrandstetterAug 5, 2008 00:25136289
How can Yoram Schweitzer, someone so shallow, hold such an important position? [313 words]Ken BesigAug 4, 2008 14:04136258
Ken, are you sure about Yoram Schweitzer? [298 words]YnnatchkahAug 9, 2008 21:07136258
About sound bites and bytes [134 words]G.VishvasAug 4, 2008 09:24136236
Same old mistakes [141 words]Rebecca MouldsAug 4, 2008 09:11136235
Yoram does spell his intentions...In my opinion.... [866 words]YnnatchkahAug 4, 2008 03:41136219

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to Ken, are you sure about Yoram Schweitzer? by Ynnatchkah

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)